
Thorney Cc
#1
Posted 17 October 2011 - 08:48 PM
#2
Posted 17 October 2011 - 08:54 PM
Has anybody fitted the thorney cc? Whats the verdict? What are the disadvantages of it over CMS cc? This has been asked but in a different thread and didnt get a response.
http://www.thorneymo...osCsid=nyasfdgn
small sh** and overpriced compared to the Proalloy setup.
#3
Posted 17 October 2011 - 09:05 PM
#4
Posted 17 October 2011 - 09:09 PM
#5
Posted 17 October 2011 - 09:15 PM
Has anybody fitted the thorney cc? Whats the verdict? What are the disadvantages of it over CMS cc? This has been asked but in a different thread and didnt get a response.
http://www.thorneymo...osCsid=nyasfdgn
small sh** and overpriced compared to the Proalloy setup.

Yes I think TMS use a shitty charge cooler along with the standard intercooler. (standard intercooler makes up for the sh** charge cooler, or other way round....)
you would be getter off buying a cheap universal kit something like this (below) and fitting it your self rather than a TMS! Piece of p*ss to fit! Save a fortune!

http://www.chargecoo...products_id=203
hats pretty much just the first one I googled, may be able to get one cheaper and more suitable.
When looking at charge coolers, make sure you ask what pressure drop in psi they create, the pro alloy one causes a drop of approx 2-3 psi, which is quite a lot to be honest.... Some are as low of a drop as the 0.1 psi etc.

Edited by chrisgold, 17 October 2011 - 09:17 PM.
#6
Posted 17 October 2011 - 10:03 PM
#7
Posted 17 October 2011 - 10:15 PM
Chris i want to go with a proven kit if i can but cheers for the link
TMS CC is proven to be sh**

What im saying is just match the components they use, same pump, rad and CC. You leave in your standard IC and the CC goes after the IC (need to move your intake temp sensor to after the CC) prob only cost you £600 parts, thats all they have done, but they charge what £1200 plus what, probs £750 fitting???
You like to throw money away go for it.
Why not get pro alloy to make you a smaller charge cooler? that you can use along with your current IC exactly as TMS do!

Edited by chrisgold, 17 October 2011 - 10:18 PM.
#8
Posted 17 October 2011 - 10:21 PM
Chris i want to go with a proven kit if i can but cheers for the link
TMS CC is proven to be sh**![]()
What in saying is just match the components they use, same pump, rad and CC. You leave in your standard IC and the CC goes after the IC (need to move your intake temp sensor to after the CC) prob only cost you £600 parts, thats all they have done, but they charge what £1200 plus what, probs £750 fitting???
You like to throw money away go for it.
Why not get pro alloy to make you a smaller charge cooler? that you can use along with your current IC exactly as TMS do!
Ive read reviews and i cant find anyone that really slates it but most stuff is a few years old. I dont like throwing money away hence me asking others opinions before i buy the expensive but proven pro alloy kit. Just like ive read the reviews and spoken to people about a stage 4 intercooler. If i was in a rush to waste money my car would of been stage 4 early this year but instead im reading reviews and asking questions ready to get more power over the winter.
And i know its time consuming to fit so whichever kit i go for ill be doing the work my self then taking it somewhere for a remap

Edited by georgebc, 17 October 2011 - 10:24 PM.
#9
Posted 17 October 2011 - 10:50 PM
TMS CC is proven to be sh**(I believe this is because = you get loads of lag as your slowing the air down twice, once with an intercooler and then with the charge cooler, also they splice the pipework so much to do this that the intake pipework diameter is reduced and a lot of added points of failure)
No it won't lag is a function of the volume of the cooler a certain bigger IC will increase lag more. The additional cooler and section changes will increase the pressure drop but that will reduce the boost seen by the engine.
As for the performance then I agree with sling the proalloy one represents much better value for money however if you can pick one up cheap then on my old car (was T2VXT's and now P11COV's) the difference was about 10bhp between the TMS set up and the Proalloy. The only thing to make sure is that he temp sensor is relocated to after the CC as this wasn't done on the early installs

As for CC rad it's shouldn't need the bigger one as it won't be putting anywhere near as much heat into the water than the proalloy setup
#10
Posted 17 October 2011 - 10:58 PM
#11
Posted 18 October 2011 - 05:21 AM
This is a mine field and i cant help but think what ever i decide to go for ill end up regretting. Ill wait to here from Duncan. Whilst doing a search i did notice he had a thread selling a TMS CC and no one posted, didnt think that was a good sign.
Cheers for the advise and opinions! Keep them coming.
My advice....
1, Listen to Winstar

2, I was basing my comments on the assumption that you'd found a second hand unit cheap and was looking to use that. If you're buying new I wouldn't buy the TMS one. If one was on ebay for a few hundred quid go for it and improve it! As for Pro Alloy pre-rad - I think Joe has some for sale!
#12
Posted 18 October 2011 - 07:57 AM




#13
Posted 18 October 2011 - 08:20 AM
#14
Posted 18 October 2011 - 09:13 AM
PM replied
Sorry for the delay soooo busy not having much time to repojnd to all of your pm's
TMS kit with the restrictions removed and some modding works fine for 300bhpthe company who make it I know really well and quality of work is A1 but they just made what was requested
Got a meeting to run to but happy to share what I did to address most of the issues and if required can do the work for you
DG
I never see the point of doing these things by PM, although with TMS there is always the danger of 'A Letter'



From what I read having intercoolers (air to air or air to water) in line is a Bad Idea, I think this is related to the loss of efficiency on the second cooler, i.e. you want the temp difference to be as great as possible between what you are cooling and what is cooling it, so parallel is ok.
From the look of it a grand is well steep for what you see in the pics.
yes and no As the proalloy is a 5 pass CC so equivalent to 5 cores in series where as the TMS is a single pass IC and a 3 pass CC. The over all temperature drop should be the same just not as elagant a way of doing it as has the dissadvantage of still dumping lots of heat into the engine bay
#15
Posted 18 October 2011 - 09:13 AM
#16
Posted 18 October 2011 - 12:18 PM
like dilbert stuff, painful at list price but you might just bear it when cheap 2nd/3rd hand.
That poxy Z pipe isnt exactly helpful either
Duncan mentioned "that poxy pipe"


#17
Posted 18 October 2011 - 12:31 PM
#18
Posted 18 October 2011 - 12:41 PM
Has anybody fitted the thorney cc? Whats the verdict? What are the disadvantages of it over CMS cc? This has been asked but in a different thread and didnt get a response.
http://www.thorneymo...osCsid=nyasfdgn
small sh** and overpriced compared to the Proalloy setup.
Why does Thorney not post on here anymore?
#19
Posted 18 October 2011 - 01:26 PM
Has anybody fitted the thorney cc? Whats the verdict? What are the disadvantages of it over CMS cc? This has been asked but in a different thread and didnt get a response.
http://www.thorneymo...osCsid=nyasfdgn
small sh** and overpriced compared to the Proalloy setup.
Why does Thorney not post on here anymore?
sold up, makes very little money from VX220 owners and is 'too busy' posting on all the VXR/Insignia/BTCC forums

#20
Posted 18 October 2011 - 11:41 PM
TMS CC is proven to be sh**(I believe this is because = you get loads of lag as your slowing the air down twice, once with an intercooler and then with the charge cooler, also they splice the pipework so much to do this that the intake pipework diameter is reduced and a lot of added points of failure)
No it won't lag is a function of the volume of the cooler a certain bigger IC will increase lag more. The additional cooler and section changes will increase the pressure drop but that will reduce the boost seen by the engine.
My bad, I meant adding the CC causes more lag than IC alone

Also why I pointed out what a terrible job TMS do on it, I saw the TMS stage 4 (a recent one) looked like a retard had attacked it with a Stanley knife.

sold up, makes very little money from VX220 owners
I wonder why.

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users