
Final Ratio Help
#1
Posted 22 June 2004 - 07:23 PM
#2
Posted 22 June 2004 - 07:40 PM

#3
Posted 22 June 2004 - 08:08 PM
Edited by garyk220, 22 June 2004 - 08:09 PM.
#4
Posted 22 June 2004 - 09:46 PM
#5
Posted 22 June 2004 - 10:04 PM
Edited by Ricky2772, 22 June 2004 - 10:06 PM.
#6
Posted 23 June 2004 - 06:17 AM
#7
Posted 23 June 2004 - 06:20 AM
#8
Posted 23 June 2004 - 06:38 AM
so the gearbox is the F23 in both vx and vxt then.but if you want higher speeds the f23 in the turbo i think has a ratio of 3.6
tx minime, I will pass the info to my tuner that will inquire at opel....

he's asking for the 1-5 gearbox ratios of the VXT as well ...anyone?!?

Edited by Ricky2772, 23 June 2004 - 06:47 AM.
#9
Posted 23 June 2004 - 10:48 AM
#10
Posted 23 June 2004 - 11:00 AM
Posted on Jun 23 2004, 10:48
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I expect that you will have to change the pinion and crown wheel together as a pair.
the final drive comes in a kit and it sounds like what you have descibed above
#11
Posted 23 June 2004 - 11:00 AM
I built a screamer once and used an early herald diff at 4.55:1


My old Nova I raced in modified saloons had 1.04 ratio 5th gear and 4.1 final drive. 5000rpm at 75mph and hit 7700rpm in 5th gear at the end of the straight in Knockhill. Fantastic! Accelerated quicker than my 2.2 VX.
#12
Posted 23 June 2004 - 11:01 AM

#13
Posted 23 June 2004 - 11:23 AM
that is what I am trying to achieve...a cost-effective improvement over the way too short (IMO) gearing, even for standard NA.Of course this is probably completely unrealistic from a cost point of view but I hope it conveys the feel of the SC car with NA gearing until you get yours up and running.
I find first gear useless in most occasions, and in second you don't even hit 100kmh!!


on any track 1st and 2nd are outright out of the question, all you do is 3rd 4th.
I would love to employ 2-3-4 effectively, while 5th will be there for relaxed cruising or long straights like monza and such....
so, anybody has the brake-down of the VXT gearbox ratios?

#14
Posted 23 June 2004 - 11:28 AM
Same as NA for first four, 5th is slightly longer;that is what I am trying to achieve...a cost-effective improvement over the way too short (IMO) gearing, even for standard NA.Of course this is probably completely unrealistic from a cost point of view but I hope it conveys the feel of the SC car with NA gearing until you get yours up and running.
I find first gear useless in most occasions, and in second you don't even hit 100kmh!!![]()
![]()
on any track 1st and 2nd are outright out of the question, all you do is 3rd 4th.
I would love to employ 2-3-4 effectively, while 5th will be there for relaxed cruising or long straights like monza and such....
so, anybody has the brake-down of the VXT gearbox ratios?![]()
1st: 3.95:1
2nd: 2.02:1
3rd: 1.35:1
4th: 0.97:1
5th: 0.79:1
Final drive: 3.63:1
VXT gear ratios at 6500rpm are good for approximately;
1st 40mph
2nd 65mph
3rd 97mph
4th 135mph
5th 170mph
#15
Posted 23 June 2004 - 11:33 AM
#16
Posted 23 June 2004 - 11:50 AM
#17
Posted 23 June 2004 - 12:26 PM
tx minime & gary,ricky why dont you increase the rev limit? with the sort of power you are developing a rev limit of 7500 will give you 165mph car?
well, I'm not really a rev freak....

what I like the best is a meaty, low-mid delivery.
6500rpms is way enough for me, also keeping rpms above 5500, the 2.2 really guzzles fuel like crazy, and SC could (and will) make things worse, so I'm trying to achieve a decent compromise, so not to have to go out and refuel every 5 laps or so at the Ring....


tomorrow I will drive by Delta-M in switz, to sort out the defective parts...along with the modified extra-injectors mounts (now installed ahead of the charger instead on the intake manifold) they will also provide a new ECU mapping, more performing.... it MIGHT be the same developed along with Courteney, but not sure....

Edited by Ricky2772, 23 June 2004 - 12:36 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users