Flat Screen Tvs - Any Advice?
#1
Posted 07 July 2012 - 04:30 PM
#2
Posted 07 July 2012 - 04:35 PM
#3
Posted 07 July 2012 - 04:36 PM
#4
Posted 07 July 2012 - 04:37 PM
Panasonic plasmas gt series or above 30 is 2011 and 50 is 2012
Or Samsung d8000 series.
Don't bother wit anything else.
And why would you recommend those specifically?
-you probably have the same sort of requirements as me, quality wise so thanks for the reply
#5
Posted 07 July 2012 - 04:42 PM
#6
Posted 07 July 2012 - 04:43 PM
Panasonic plasmas gt series or above 30 is 2011 and 50 is 2012
Or Samsung d8000 series.
Don't bother wit anything else.
Easy to say if money is no object. D8000 is a very expensive set. I compared D8000 side by side with Sony HX803 for picture quality and didn't see much in it.
The D8000 has much better viewing angles, but I didn't think motion handling is quite as good, especially on SD. Sony was half the price!
One word of advice is do not ever visit avforums.com! They will scare you off buying -any- tv because every imperfection is scrutinised.
Edited by WrightStuff, 07 July 2012 - 04:43 PM.
#7
Posted 07 July 2012 - 04:48 PM
Panasonic plasmas gt series or above 30 is 2011 and 50 is 2012
Or Samsung d8000 series.
Don't bother wit anything else.
Easy to say if money is no object. D8000 is a very expensive set. I compared D8000 side by side with Sony HX803 for picture quality and didn't see much in it.
The D8000 has much better viewing angles, but I didn't think motion handling is quite as good, especially on SD. Sony was half the price!
One word of advice is do not ever visit avforums.com! They will scare you off buying -any- tv because every imperfection is scrutinised.
That's why I've stayed off there lol
The d8k is mega cash, and personally I dislike the picture as its too good and I reckon with an sd source it will be nasty to look at. Plasma all the way for me.
#8
Posted 07 July 2012 - 04:50 PM
Panasonic plasmas gt series or above 30 is 2011 and 50 is 2012
Or Samsung d8000 series.
Don't bother wit anything else.
Easy to say if money is no object. D8000 is a very expensive set. I compared D8000 side by side with Sony HX803 for picture quality and didn't see much in it.
The D8000 has much better viewing angles, but I didn't think motion handling is quite as good, especially on SD. Sony was half the price!
One word of advice is do not ever visit avforums.com! They will scare you off buying -any- tv because every imperfection is scrutinised.
much like dp review!
LCD is apparently old technology, so it is down to plasma or LED. Media centre wise the PlayStation 3 does all of what i could want. Sadly the old XBMC wont isnt really for the high def generation which i have always loved on my old modded xbox.
#9
Posted 07 July 2012 - 04:53 PM
#10
Posted 07 July 2012 - 04:55 PM
Panasonic plasmas gt series or above 30 is 2011 and 50 is 2012
Or Samsung d8000 series.
Don't bother wit anything else.
Easy to say if money is no object. D8000 is a very expensive set. I compared D8000 side by side with Sony HX803 for picture quality and didn't see much in it.
The D8000 has much better viewing angles, but I didn't think motion handling is quite as good, especially on SD. Sony was half the price!
One word of advice is do not ever visit avforums.com! They will scare you off buying -any- tv because every imperfection is scrutinised.
That's why I've stayed off there lol
The d8k is mega cash, and personally I dislike the picture as its too good and I reckon with an sd source it will be nasty to look at. Plasma all the way for me.
Panasonic plasmas gt series or above 30 is 2011 and 50 is 2012
Or Samsung d8000 series.
Don't bother wit anything else.
Easy to say if money is no object. D8000 is a very expensive set. I compared D8000 side by side with Sony HX803 for picture quality and didn't see much in it.
The D8000 has much better viewing angles, but I didn't think motion handling is quite as good, especially on SD. Sony was half the price!
One word of advice is do not ever visit avforums.com! They will scare you off buying -any- tv because every imperfection is scrutinised.
That's why I've stayed off there lol
The d8k is mega cash, and personally I dislike the picture as its too good and I reckon with an sd source it will be nasty to look at. Plasma all the way for me.
What is the main reason for chosing plasma over LED tv these days ? Historically it was always black levels / contrast but surely there's not much in it now ?
I have the picture set bright on my tv, and even with all the lights off, watching a film like Alien there is only the merest hint of backlight.
E.g. its not absolute inky abyss black, but its pretty darn good.
#11
Posted 07 July 2012 - 05:01 PM
#12
Posted 07 July 2012 - 05:20 PM
#13
Posted 07 July 2012 - 05:57 PM
#14
Posted 07 July 2012 - 06:10 PM
#15
Posted 07 July 2012 - 09:43 PM
I bought a lg 47 inch led smart tv a few weeks ago to replace my old panasonic 50 inch
plasma , black levels are much better on the led (somtimes too black), plus its only about
20mm thick so dosent need a wall large mount, reason I got was mainly for 3d gaming and 3d films
which it dose brilliantly and the fact it use passive 3d so the glasses are cheap, lightweight
plus you can use the cinema glasses, but one its coolest features for gaming is dual play
it makes 2 player split screen a thing of the past, you use one screen but both of have the full
screen by use of special glasses, also has the smart tv thing which ok.
To be honest I was split between this and a 51inch 3d plasma at the time this only won
because of the passive 3d and it has full smart tv (which the other half wanted)
I also have an infocus x1 projector love the thing bought when we moved in to the house
eight years ago, although when we got the plasma it never really got used.
Thanks that is really helpful.
I am not really csold on the whole smart tv thing to be honest, nor 3d, nor split gaming. It is quite frustrating being in the market where the main pitch and selling points are not features that i really want. I just want a bloody good big tv....
maybe i dont need to spend very much and can go for a more basic model afterall.
-not selling your olf plasma are you?!
#16
Posted 08 July 2012 - 07:04 AM
#17
Posted 08 July 2012 - 11:29 AM
I bought a lg 47 inch led smart tv a few weeks ago to replace my old panasonic 50 inch
plasma , black levels are much better on the led (somtimes too black), plus its only about
20mm thick so dosent need a wall large mount, reason I got was mainly for 3d gaming and 3d films
which it dose brilliantly and the fact it use passive 3d so the glasses are cheap, lightweight
plus you can use the cinema glasses, but one its coolest features for gaming is dual play
it makes 2 player split screen a thing of the past, you use one screen but both of have the full
screen by use of special glasses, also has the smart tv thing which ok.
To be honest I was split between this and a 51inch 3d plasma at the time this only won
because of the passive 3d and it has full smart tv (which the other half wanted)
I also have an infocus x1 projector love the thing bought when we moved in to the house
eight years ago, although when we got the plasma it never really got used.
Thanks that is really helpful.
I am not really csold on the whole smart tv thing to be honest, nor 3d, nor split gaming. It is quite frustrating being in the market where the main pitch and selling points are not features that i really want. I just want a bloody good big tv....
maybe i dont need to spend very much and can go for a more basic model afterall.
-not selling your olf plasma are you?!
No sorry mate it in conservatory with the xbox on it
now, though should think you can pick a cheap 50+inch
plasma with out all the bells and whistles on it, think
currys were doing a 60inch for about £700 ish
#18
Posted 08 July 2012 - 11:54 AM
#19
Posted 08 July 2012 - 12:25 PM
#20
Posted 08 July 2012 - 05:38 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users