- Idle speed is high - 1500rpm - but every now and then settles down to 900rpm and stays there
- Transition from idle to low throttle opening is jerky and unpredictable
- There is a flat spot at around 2750rpm, just before it sets off like a cat with a banger up its bum
- On a run, the charge cooler water returns to the tank cold. I'm running the dual pass conversion and I haven't been caning it, just constant motorway speeds. Should the coolant only get warm when using the whine?
- I had the rear clam off and it was refitted by the paint shop after a respray, but the rear boot lit sits about half a centimeter too high now. Is that clam alignment and how do I fix it?
- I've fitted a Tullett 2.5" full system and it is unbelievably loud....is that normal? I had an S1 Elise with an Exige manifold and piper back box before and that was nowhere near as loud
- I've blanked off the larger bore vacuum pipe on the SC unit and connected the smaller bore pipe to the vacuum on the brake system. It looks untidy - is there a different solution out there?

Sc Conversion - Gremlin Elimination
#1
Posted 27 September 2012 - 11:26 AM
#2
Posted 27 September 2012 - 11:39 AM
- Idle speed is high - 1500rpm - but every now and then settles down to 900rpm and stays there
- Transition from idle to low throttle opening is jerky and unpredictable
- There is a flat spot at around 2750rpm, just before it sets off like a cat with a banger up its bum
- On a run, the charge cooler water returns to the tank cold. I'm running the dual pass conversion and I haven't been caning it, just constant motorway speeds. Should the coolant only get warm when using the whine?
- I've fitted a Tullett 2.5" full system and it is unbelievably loud....is that normal? I had an S1 Elise with an Exige manifold and piper back box before and that was nowhere near as loud
#3
Posted 27 September 2012 - 12:05 PM
#4
Posted 27 September 2012 - 12:07 PM
#5
Posted 27 September 2012 - 12:08 PM
#6
Posted 27 September 2012 - 12:15 PM
- Idle speed is high - 1500rpm - but every now and then settles down to 900rpm and stays there
- Should be at 900 all the time - could be your base map, but most probably one of the sensors
- Transition from idle to low throttle opening is jerky and unpredictable
- Can happen when cold - should be perfectly smooth once warm
- There is a flat spot at around 2750rpm, just before it sets off like a cat with a banger up its bum
- Thats the base map
- On a run, the charge cooler water returns to the tank cold. I'm running the dual pass conversion and I haven't been caning it, just constant motorway speeds. Should the coolant only get warm when using the whine?
- This is normal, even on track it never goes much above tepid.
- I had the rear clam off and it was refitted by the paint shop after a respray, but the rear boot lit sits about half a centimeter too high now. Is that clam alignment and how do I fix it?
- Suspect the catch is upside down, or incorrectly fitted
- I've fitted a Tullett 2.5" full system and it is unbelievably loud....is that normal? I had an S1 Elise with an Exige manifold and piper back box before and that was nowhere near as loud
- Thats a Tullet for you...
- I've blanked off the larger bore vacuum pipe on the SC unit and connected the smaller bore pipe to the vacuum on the brake system. It looks untidy - is there a different solution out there?
- Yep there is an OEM fitting which is virtually imposible to find. You need a corsa B vaccum connector
#7
Posted 27 September 2012 - 12:19 PM
#8
Posted 27 September 2012 - 12:28 PM

#9
Posted 27 September 2012 - 12:33 PM
#10
Posted 27 September 2012 - 12:34 PM
it won't be a clam spacing problem, it will be a bootlid issue, 99% its a catch position (but could be a hinge mistake too)
Corsa B vaccum hose is large diameter, you also need a new one way valve which is large dia entry and large dia exit.
see it here:

here

here

and here

#11
Posted 27 September 2012 - 12:46 PM

#12
Posted 27 September 2012 - 12:56 PM
I had the rear clam off and it was refitted by the paint shop after a respray, but the rear boot lit sits about half a centimeter too high now. Is that clam alignment and how do I fix it?
In my case the boot rubber was not pressed on hard enough after replacement. Could be worth checking.
#13
Posted 27 September 2012 - 01:14 PM

#14
Posted 27 September 2012 - 01:18 PM
For example, even after remap, and when warm, the transition between idle / cruise and boost is still a bit jerky and the car still stutters on part throttle between 1800-2000rpm. Pretty bad when cold, not too bad when warm. This is where the limitations of the type of mapping them can do is exposed (although its still drivable, its very clearly modified IMO), and one of the main reasons I'm looking at converting to an improved or standalone ECU..
I don't get any of those symptoms but have had many hours of part throttle mapping done. Still changing ECU and engine though.
#15
Posted 27 September 2012 - 01:24 PM
For example, even after remap, and when warm, the transition between idle / cruise and boost is still a bit jerky and the car still stutters on part throttle between 1800-2000rpm. Pretty bad when cold, not too bad when warm. This is where the limitations of the type of mapping them can do is exposed (although its still drivable, its very clearly modified IMO), and one of the main reasons I'm looking at converting to an improved or standalone ECU..
I don't get any of those symptoms but have had many hours of part throttle mapping done. Still changing ECU and engine though.
Same as Techie, my first map still had the flat spot a bit, second time I went in I mentioned this and CS went back and forth about 3 times with Steffan and it's very smooth now.
#16
Posted 27 September 2012 - 01:26 PM
For example, even after remap, and when warm, the transition between idle / cruise and boost is still a bit jerky and the car still stutters on part throttle between 1800-2000rpm. Pretty bad when cold, not too bad when warm. This is where the limitations of the type of mapping them can do is exposed (although its still drivable, its very clearly modified IMO), and one of the main reasons I'm looking at converting to an improved or standalone ECU..
I don't get any of those symptoms but have had many hours of part throttle mapping done. Still changing ECU and engine though.
Mine was probably mapped as quick as they could do it, as I had to get on my way. Plus minor engine bay fire didnt help with schedule..


#17
Posted 27 September 2012 - 01:30 PM
LSJ ECU + B207 / Z20NET is looking the easiest option for me, infact looks like my winter project...
T'is what I'm doing (the engine has been sat here for over a year now) the soon as Joe pulls his finger out. Going to stick with 2 litre as well and not twat about with cranks to try and restore capacity.
#18
Posted 27 September 2012 - 01:38 PM
LSJ ECU + B207 / Z20NET is looking the easiest option for me, infact looks like my winter project...
T'is what I'm doing (the engine has been sat here for over a year now) the soon as Joe pulls his finger out. Going to stick with 2 litre as well and not twat about with cranks to try and restore capacity.
2L, lighter crank, square bore / stroke ratio, lightened flywheel, balancer delete, better mapping and more linear throttle control - should feel significantly different to my otherwise standard 2.2... Don't think I'll miss any torque deficit for road use.
#19
Posted 27 September 2012 - 01:40 PM
Don't think I'll miss any torque deficit for road use.
That's the conclusion I came to. Doesn't bother me in the slightest if I lose 20bhp/20ftlb's. The benefit of the square dimensions, the easy mapability and lack of stupid aftermarket piston clearances are what appeals.
#20
Posted 27 September 2012 - 02:01 PM
Don't think I'll miss any torque deficit for road use.
That's the conclusion I came to. Doesn't bother me in the slightest if I lose 20bhp/20ftlb's. The benefit of the square dimensions, the easy mapability and lack of stupid aftermarket piston clearances are what appeals.
From what I've read, you won't really loose any power, just move it a bit further to the right on the chart. Perhaps some low end grunt (but then again, I'm very rarely asking for WoT, so does it matter?) . Plus I'll probably fit a slightly smaller pulley (maybe 3"?) and get it mapped to suit. Benefit for me is that I can / have fitted a bolt in engine job and some additional wiring, but can't / haven't rebuilt an engine, and as the cost for rods / pistons is about the same as a B207 engine..
Anyway, looks like the Z22SE is the gremlin..

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users