Hi All,



Posted 20 March 2014 - 12:56 AM
Hi All,
Posted 20 March 2014 - 01:51 PM
Posted 25 March 2014 - 08:48 AM
Posted 25 March 2014 - 08:17 PM
Its very very good - the big difference is there is no torque converter, so no slip - the revs dont take off when you put the foot down like an old skool auto. You also get proper engine braking and throttle blips when you downchange, plus a kickdown under the accelerator pedal (put your foot to the floor, and there's an extra bit of travel which will kick the gearbox down into a lower gear).
I had a BMW with a traditional auto a few years ago, and it was great, but it sometimes felt like there was an elastic band in the drivetrain. It also had minimal engine braking, which was annoying on a windy B-road, it needed constant dabs of the brakes whereas normally engine braking would do the job. This new type of gearbox sorts 95% of those problems.
Whenever I'm looking for another motor, I'll be looking for a DSG > manual > auto ... its that good!
Posted 25 March 2014 - 08:24 PM
Brake it and put the engine in the VX LOL
Posted 25 March 2014 - 08:29 PM
you know what, it did cross my mind!
Posted 25 March 2014 - 08:34 PM
you know what, it did cross my mind!
A lot of eliese S1 s with the 1,8 unit in . Not a cheap conversion
Posted 10 April 2014 - 01:15 PM
Posted 12 April 2014 - 09:43 PM
Posted 18 April 2014 - 03:12 PM
Posted 18 April 2014 - 04:21 PM
Its OK for a 3.2, 30 mpg on a run, low 20s in town driving. Range is about 400 miles to a tank (60 litres)
Posted 19 April 2014 - 08:04 AM
I had one of these before the VX, completely different experience than a VX granted, but an amazing car to drive non the less.. can't think of a better all rounder daily drive for the money tbh, suprised it hasn't sold already!
The 3.2 I had was better on fuel than the 1.8T I had previous when out on a journey
Posted 19 April 2014 - 09:06 AM
Posted 21 April 2014 - 07:43 PM
Now up on PH http://www.pistonhea...ro-2004/2248064
- obviously I'd prefer it to go to a good home, so I'll do a better price on here.
Posted 21 April 2014 - 09:10 PM
Posted 22 April 2014 - 05:51 AM
Doubtful.How big are the rear seats? Probably couldn't get a rear facing baby seat in it?
Posted 22 April 2014 - 04:22 PM
How big are the rear seats? Probably couldn't get a rear facing baby seat in it?
Possibly, there are isofix points on the back seats. You'd definitely get a forward facing one in.
Posted 24 April 2014 - 08:53 AM
Posted 24 April 2014 - 09:12 AM
I drove it the other day and it is a lovely car. I guess if you drive it hard like anything it will drink fuel hand over fist however John explained that on a long run, average motorway speeds then it hits 34-35mpg. However as you can imagine planting the right foot and its rubbish on mpg.
Posted 30 April 2014 - 07:22 AM
MOT done last Friday - I did nothing but drive it in & it passed with no advisories.
And in terms of mpg I'm getting 24.2 mpg pottering around London, and mid 30s on a run.
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users