Jump to content


Photo

Opcon Superchargers


  • Please log in to reply
30 replies to this topic

#1 LMP1

LMP1

    Member

  • Pip
  • 247 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Athens, Greece

Posted 15 June 2014 - 05:24 PM

Sorry for the stupid question, i have a friend who says that he can find opcon twin screw sc's

 

relatively cheap. I will look into it, but i d like to ask you first if you know anything about them.

 

I found that:

 

 http://www.not2fast....s/autorotor.pdf

 

if its of any help

 

(i think i ll go sc... after many changes of mind :blush: )



#2 Scuffers

Scuffers

    Billy No Mates

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,306 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 15 June 2014 - 05:29 PM

As twin-screw compressors go, Opcon are one of the quality manufactuers.

 

HOWEVER!

 

great as twin screws are, they do have downsides, for a road car that spend most of it;s time off-boost, they are a much bigger parasitic drag than the TVS.

 

where they 'win' is that in high boost applications, they are more adiabatic efficient in theory as they are a compressor, not a pump.

 

the reality though is that unless you're planning on more than ~1.5 Bar boost, the TVS wins hands down, (before the TVS they probably had a better chance )

 

 



#3 LMP1

LMP1

    Member

  • Pip
  • 247 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Athens, Greece

Posted 15 June 2014 - 05:46 PM

is that boost pressure (that TVS is preferable) ok for a little less than 400hp [where the liners give up (z22se/z20net variant)]? 

 

400hp include the parasitic loses so around 350 at the fly

 

Thank you for your help!!



#4 Scuffers

Scuffers

    Billy No Mates

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,306 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 15 June 2014 - 05:52 PM

Not sure whatyour getting at? Current TVS cars are making ~320 at the wheels with ~ 220Kpa (absolute)...

#5 LMP1

LMP1

    Member

  • Pip
  • 247 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Athens, Greece

Posted 15 June 2014 - 06:04 PM

Current TVS cars are making ~320 at the wheels with ~ 220Kpa (absolute)...

 

 

:happy: thanks!!

 

*absolute means 1.2 bar + 1 bar the atmosheric?



#6 techieboy

techieboy

    Supercharger of Doom

  • 22,914 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bedford

Posted 15 June 2014 - 08:25 PM

Looks very similar to the Lysholm chargers that were fitted to the very early VX/Speedster conversions. Don't know if they're related in some way?

#7 slindborg

slindborg

    The Bishop of Stortford

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,602 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:.

Posted 16 June 2014 - 07:14 AM

Also, boost is merely a measure of how bad the engine is at breathing

#8 Scuffers

Scuffers

    Billy No Mates

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,306 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 16 June 2014 - 07:38 AM

Looks very similar to the Lysholm chargers that were fitted to the very early VX/Speedster conversions. Don't know if they're related in some way?

they are, Opcon brought Lysholm (and have now sold them again!)    

Also, boost is merely a measure of how bad the engine is at breathing

very much so, in an ideal world, you can get the airflow without the boost for example, Lee's car usinging ~220 Kpa to make ~330, a K20'ed Exige is making 300 with 158Kpa (on less CC's of engine and a less efficient M62).

#9 LMP1

LMP1

    Member

  • Pip
  • 247 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Athens, Greece

Posted 16 June 2014 - 10:28 AM

so head port and polish will improve performance for less boost



#10 slindborg

slindborg

    The Bishop of Stortford

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,602 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:.

Posted 16 June 2014 - 11:26 AM

so head port and polish will improve performance for less boost

depends who does it and what is done...

 

because most engine work isnt done in isolation its very hard to dtermine real gains from some things that seem popular to mod.

 

e.g.

The head might actually flow well enough to make the power but the inlet manifold could be a bottleneck, so headwork wouldnt improve anything other than lightening your wallet.



#11 LMP1

LMP1

    Member

  • Pip
  • 247 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Athens, Greece

Posted 17 June 2014 - 06:30 AM

i have this manifold. Is it ok?



#12 slindborg

slindborg

    The Bishop of Stortford

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,602 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:.

Posted 17 June 2014 - 07:06 AM

Only if you purchased it second hand for sod all. Dilbert tuning parts are the biggest con going imho

#13 Scuffers

Scuffers

    Billy No Mates

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,306 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 17 June 2014 - 07:28 AM

i have this manifold. Is it ok?

how's that work with the supercharger?



#14 Stig_1911

Stig_1911

    Member

  • Pip
  • 121 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Norway

Posted 17 June 2014 - 08:06 AM

If you are using the dilbert manifold, think you have to go with rotrex chargers...

#15 smiley

smiley

    Thetan level 15

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,427 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted 17 June 2014 - 08:43 AM

Rotrex users can just channel it back into a plastic 2.4 manifold.

Too bad GM bumped up the price of it to silly level.



#16 Scuffers

Scuffers

    Billy No Mates

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,306 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 17 June 2014 - 09:27 AM

If you are using the dilbert manifold, think you have to go with rotrex chargers...

Pikey rubish option



#17 slindborg

slindborg

    The Bishop of Stortford

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,602 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:.

Posted 17 June 2014 - 10:02 AM

Pikey??!?!?!? they are far from cheap :lol:



#18 Scuffers

Scuffers

    Billy No Mates

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,306 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 17 June 2014 - 10:26 AM

Pikey??!?!?!? they are far from cheap :lol:

Maybe so, but they are still a pikey POS.



#19 smiley

smiley

    Thetan level 15

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,427 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted 17 June 2014 - 10:45 AM

It performed pretty well when comparing it to a harroped one over here on the dyno.

Slightly later start in torque climb, but then comparable way up.

 



#20 Nev

Nev

    Nipper's Minion

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,587 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bristol
  • Interests:Rock climbing, skiing, kayaking, surfing, mountaineering, budgies, chess, practical mechanics.

Posted 17 June 2014 - 11:15 AM

Hi LMP1, If you want to get more power for less boost you need to think about getting more air into and out of your engine with less resistance. This can be done in many ways. In short, you need to think (from first principles) about how the air travels from the atmosphere (just before the air-box) to atmosphere (just after the tailpipes). Eliminating restrictions to this airflow is the fundamental concept of tuning the engine, as after all it is just a large "air processing machine". Hope that helps.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users