9 replies to this topic

[Zoobeef]

There's 2 settings for these to go on. In Grahams picture it looks like they are in the lower of the two but mine don't fit as they are too wide. Are they supposed to be in the upper or does it not matter as the height will be just set by the suspension?
If it's upper I need to modify the ABS bracket rubbers as it try to push it up too much.

Passenger side just fits in the upper position.



Drivers side not fitting in the lower one.

[chris_uk]

ask to borrow simons hammer. 

[Scuffers]

Lower holes are std height... Looks like they are a bit opened up, pull the sides in a bit...

[Zoobeef]

Cheers, That was my next step tomorrow, the Mrs is here now so I had to stop play. I didn't want to put it in one set of holes then Matt have to swap it too the others when I drop it off at his on Sunday.

[chris_uk]

scuffs.. if the lower holes are standard ride height why would you make brackets which make the car sit higher? 

[Steve.i.am]

scuffs.. if the lower holes are standard ride height why would you make brackets which make the car sit higher? 

I wondered that.

[Scuffers]

Other lower! (As in the options are std or lowered) Realistically, there is no reason to use the non std holes.

[chris_uk]

so if the options are standard and lowered that would mean that the standard holes are the top holes and the lowered option is the bottom holes.. 

[Graeme Lambert]

FYI mark I had to 'tweak' the brackets to fit - they were too wide (to accom the body) for the chassis.

[Ormes]

Other lower! (As in the options are std or lowered) Realistically, there is no reason to use the non std holes.

Not looking to challenge you scuffers ...but would a reason be to introduce more pre-load whilst maintaining the same ride height?