
Mazda 3 Fastback Sport Nav Vs Mazda 6 Sport Nav 150 Or 175
#1
Posted 13 July 2014 - 06:02 PM
#2
Posted 13 July 2014 - 07:31 PM
My opinion.
The Mazda's will feel cheap after driving a 5 series.
The last mazda 3 I drove, not a brand new one, had a lot of road noise. Could have been the choice/condition of tyres, but I'd certainly have an extended road test before ordering one.
#3
Posted 13 July 2014 - 08:00 PM
#4
Posted 14 July 2014 - 09:30 PM
#5
Posted 15 July 2014 - 12:14 PM
How about an alternative option?
I have recently bought a Mondeo ST TDci. It has the same 2.2 diesel engine you mention. I bought it as I used to have one as a company car and absolutely loved it. Its more involving and IMO better value than the Mazda.
46MPG realistic and 50-55MPG if you want to be boring.
The new versions (Titanium X) look awesome too....
Great cars and a lot of car for the money as a second hand purchase after someone else has taken the brunt of depreciation.
Mines had a filter, exhaust and remap, making 200BHP and 360 ft / torque.... pretty impressive with the economy and comfort to match.
Just wanted to try and help make an alternative suggestion.
Good luck,
Jon
#6
Posted 15 July 2014 - 12:40 PM
6 is nice, i wouldn't have a 3.
I wouldn't buy new either if you are trying to make money on it.
#7
Posted 15 July 2014 - 07:11 PM
#8
Posted 15 July 2014 - 07:14 PM
Thanks Graeme - it would be useful, if you think either would be a better buy than a Merc C class coupe. Genuinely open to opinion, never had a Merc and have always been stopped from a coupe as last 19 years have been a company car and 2/3 doors were not allowed.Driven various 6s and 3s at launch, and currently have a 3 150 diesel tonight. Can dig out my copy and download my thoughts if it would genuinely help?
#9
Posted 16 July 2014 - 06:50 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users