Jump to content


Photo

Tire Width Ratio Front To Rear


  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

#1 Jonny dhr

Jonny dhr

    Member

  • Pip
  • 181 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oxfordshire
  • Interests:Downhill Mountain Biking

Posted 26 February 2015 - 09:47 PM

I know there are tonnes of topics on wider tires, especially focusing in front options. What I can't find anywhere though is whether there is a certain ratio of front width compared to rear width that works the best? E.g does 195 front work best with 225 or 235 rear? If you go 205 front do you stay 225 rear? Ultimate goal of course- less under steer/ sharper turn in! Cheers, Jonny

#2 Ormes

Ormes

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,612 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Corsham (nr. Chippenham)

Posted 27 February 2015 - 08:09 AM

All I can tell is what people tend to go for which is 195 or 205 with 225 or 215 with 235.

#3 Nev

Nev

    Nipper's Minion

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,587 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bristol
  • Interests:Rock climbing, skiing, kayaking, surfing, mountaineering, budgies, chess, practical mechanics.

Posted 27 February 2015 - 09:02 AM

The ratio is important, but so is the geo (camber) as both of these determine how the car "slides". I have 245mm width on the fronts and 285mm width on the rears with -0.5 camber on front and -1.5 camber on the rears. With this setup the other night when on a very slippery roundabout (with 3 lanes width), I was happy to note that the car broke away on all 4 corner simultaneously and slid in a very controlled way. Bascially all I did was look at other mid engine cars for a clue on ratios. HTH.

#4 Tonie Pettersson

Tonie Pettersson

    Super Member

  • PipPip
  • 423 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Katrineholm, Sweden

Posted 27 February 2015 - 09:52 AM

I´m running 205/50-16" front and 235/40-17" rear on TD´s 7x16/8x17, ride height 123/128 with this geo

 

Total toe-out front: 0°03' Camber front left: 0.9° (max camber for my OEM uprights) Camber front right: 0.85° (max camber for my OEM uprights) Toe in rear left: 0°13' Toe in rear right: 0°13' Camber rear left: 2.5° Camber rear right: 2.6°

 

The car felt really good with this setup, very well balanced and got rid of most of the under steer.



#5 TheRealVXed

TheRealVXed

    Sidekick

  • 5,975 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Gotham City
  • Interests:Holy potatoes, fist combat, lycra

Posted 27 February 2015 - 11:04 AM

The factory geo is designed to be more biased to understeer as this is "safer"

 

Go and get a decent geo, a more track focussed one should dial a lot of that out.

 

ETA: I have a 340R geo on mine with 195 fronts, 225 rears.  It over steers much more readily than understeers rallly suits me :D


Edited by TheRealVXed, 27 February 2015 - 11:05 AM.


#6 Jonny dhr

Jonny dhr

    Member

  • Pip
  • 181 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oxfordshire
  • Interests:Downhill Mountain Biking

Posted 27 February 2015 - 11:14 AM

Do you have to have modified uprights to achieve 340r geo?

 

I have a basic geo done already, but nowhere near as much camber on the front as the 340r, which is -1.5 right?

 

I currently have 195 front and 235 rear. I was going to go 205 front, but wasn't sure to stick to 235 rear or go 225. If I'm able to get more camber on standard uprights then I will do as well :) 



#7 james_ly

james_ly

    Need to get Out More

  • PipPipPipPip
  • 864 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Reading, Berks

Posted 27 February 2015 - 12:00 PM

Do you have to have modified uprights to achieve 340r geo?

 

I have a basic geo done already, but nowhere near as much camber on the front as the 340r, which is -1.5 right?

 

I currently have 195 front and 235 rear. I was going to go 205 front, but wasn't sure to stick to 235 rear or go 225. If I'm able to get more camber on standard uprights then I will do as well  :)

 

http://wiki.seloc.org/a/Geo_Setups

 

340R road geo requires no special mods. 340R track might well do...  



#8 Jonny dhr

Jonny dhr

    Member

  • Pip
  • 181 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oxfordshire
  • Interests:Downhill Mountain Biking

Posted 27 February 2015 - 01:37 PM

thanks for this... guess I will try and aim for the max. negative camber I can go to on the front on standard uprights with whoever ends up doing the geo



#9 P11 COV

P11 COV

    Whipping Boy

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,686 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:MK
  • Interests:Cars, Music, God, Family. Holidays.

Posted 27 February 2015 - 06:01 PM

Matt Bentley  https://www.facebook...acing?pnref=lhc  will do you a good geo and advice on the best set up wheels tyres wise. He knows his Vx's and Elises. He's a good guy to chat to about it and is only an hour from you.

 

Steve at http://www.guglielmi...eguglielmi.html    also does a good geo on these cars and is not to far also.

 

I have used both several times over the last ten years. Personally I'd go for Matt out of the two at the moment.



#10 Jonny dhr

Jonny dhr

    Member

  • Pip
  • 181 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oxfordshire
  • Interests:Downhill Mountain Biking

Posted 27 February 2015 - 10:13 PM

Nice one.. Steve is where I got my first geo done, but it was a very basic one as the car was pulling to one side under braking, so he didn't put anything aggressive on there. Geometry aside, I'm still un decided between 205/235, 205/225 or stick with 195/225. I may well give Matt a call and ask his opinion

#11 Georgeralph43

Georgeralph43

    Super Member

  • PipPip
  • 344 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hertfordshire

Posted 28 February 2015 - 08:41 AM

Any specialists in Hertfordshire that can do the geo?

#12 scw02102

scw02102

    Billy No Mates

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,581 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Kent

Posted 28 February 2015 - 10:05 AM

Personally I'm surprised path at 10mm us gonna make a noticeable difference I wouldn't worry one bit When I did the car limits day It was driving input and how aggressively u turn in made the most difference not the width of tyres

#13 Nev

Nev

    Nipper's Minion

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,587 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bristol
  • Interests:Rock climbing, skiing, kayaking, surfing, mountaineering, budgies, chess, practical mechanics.

Posted 28 February 2015 - 10:15 AM

Any specialists in Hertfordshire that can do the geo?

 

Try doing it yourself (look online for video), it's quite easy, just takes a bit of time.

 

If you do it yourself, you can fiddle with settings back and forth with test drives in between and then come up with a geo that suits you, rather than what someone else infers you might want.

 

BTW, if you drive on road you will not be wanting max front negative camber (as your post mentions above), I wouldn't go above -0.5 degree camber on the front TBH, or you will get excessive inner barrel wear and also the car wont dig in reliably on variable road cambers (particularly in the wet).


Edited by Nev, 28 February 2015 - 10:19 AM.


#14 slindborg

slindborg

    The Bishop of Stortford

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,602 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:.

Posted 28 February 2015 - 10:20 AM

Just having the toe setup properly made mine massively more stable even with odd cambers. When I say more stable, it would oversteer easier but it was controllable and recoverable whereas before it would oversteer and then spin

#15 Smashf15c

Smashf15c

    Member

  • Pip
  • 25 posts
  • Location:Bury St Edmunds

Posted 01 March 2015 - 11:20 PM

Johnny I did 195/225 winter setup and I have 205/235 summer/track tyres - standard geo settings and have tracked the car & wouldn't change a thing. Hmmm, of course, the Elise's kept up with me on track, maybe I should fiddle with it some more ;) Smash




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users