Hi folks
Just a quick question. What would be cheaper- powdercoating or zinc plate + passivate?
Cheers
Mani
Edited by Mani, 05 December 2015 - 06:21 PM.
Posted 05 December 2015 - 06:20 PM
Hi folks
Just a quick question. What would be cheaper- powdercoating or zinc plate + passivate?
Cheers
Mani
Edited by Mani, 05 December 2015 - 06:21 PM.
Posted 05 December 2015 - 06:26 PM
How about which would be more effective? Powder coating isn't that durable, once it's penetrated, it will flake along the whole interface, whereas zinc plating is bonded to the interface so won't fail with one scrape.
Posted 05 December 2015 - 06:36 PM
Posted 05 December 2015 - 07:23 PM
Posted 05 December 2015 - 07:36 PM
Posted 05 December 2015 - 10:27 PM
Why not do both. 150 for full plate and passivity plus 100 for powder coat.
As FLD says. That's where my money would be spent. Protect and cover rather than just short term cover.
Posted 05 December 2015 - 11:09 PM
Agree with everything above. We used to use Cadmium and passivation until Cadmium was outlawed as a heavy metal, then we went to zinc and pass which is just as good. There was once upon a time another surface treatment, long gone, called Parkerising which if I recall was a phosphating process. Powder coating may be fine for garden furniture but absolutely not for wishbones upon which your life depends - don't even think about it!
Edited by Madmitch, 05 December 2015 - 11:12 PM.
Posted 05 December 2015 - 11:19 PM
Why not do both. 150 for full plate and passivity plus 100 for powder coat.
As FLD says. That's where my money would be spent. Protect and cover rather than just short term cover.
Mainly because the two processes are not easily compatible, there are many issues with the bonding of the powder onto plated steel, even worse if it has been passivate plated as well. It will not take to laquer at all (the third stage of zinc plated treatments)
If you really want to go down this route I would suggest a company that does both and understands the issues.
If you go to a plating company and then onto a seperate powder coating shop you could easily end up with finishing issues and the chances are each will blame the other.
Probably best to decide exactly what your priority is, display finish or protection?
For protection 3 stage (zinc +chromate + lacquer) is probably as good as it will ever get with this process. Not good with stone chips though.
For even higher protection you can look at the range of flouropolymers, Xylan for example but these are not only expensive but also very reliant on pre treatment and correct application methods.
I was recently shown a Xylan coated product fitted to an Elise which was corroded to about 50% of it's surface area after just 2 years. So much for superior protection.
Powder coating is much better for damage protection but if not prepared correctly will also peel, or worse seperate from the steel without flaking so you cannot see what is happening under the skin as mentioned above.
Personally I would use a quality company offering the 3 stage zinc and just keep an eye on it.
Posted 06 December 2015 - 08:07 AM
Posted 06 December 2015 - 08:33 AM
The only people we use are these, quality is second to none but probably not the cheapest.
http://www.allenchro.../services/zinc/
Not exactly local though.
Posted 06 December 2015 - 09:43 AM
Google is always a friend: https://www.google.c...lating stafford
Posted 06 December 2015 - 10:34 AM
Posted 06 December 2015 - 03:46 PM
Posted 06 December 2015 - 08:25 PM
Posted 06 December 2015 - 08:33 PM
I wouldn't powder coat again.
Need to redo mine which have started to rust after 4 years.
Posted 06 December 2015 - 08:36 PM
Same as mine😠I wouldn't powder coat again. Need to redo mine which have started to rust after 4 years.
Posted 06 December 2015 - 08:59 PM
Posted 06 December 2015 - 09:13 PM
mine were the same, good for 3 years, not 4.5
Posted 06 December 2015 - 10:04 PM
Posted 06 December 2015 - 11:39 PM
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users