#1
Posted 20 January 2016 - 02:22 PM
#2
Posted 20 January 2016 - 03:06 PM
Ferrari - 18/19 February (unconfirmed)
Haas - 21 February
Force India - TBC
Renault - TBC
McLaren - 21 February
Mercedes - TBC
Red Bull - TBC
Sauber - 1 March
Toro Rosso - TBC
Williams - 22 February
Manor - TBC
#3
Posted 20 January 2016 - 04:17 PM
Ferrari - 18/19 February (unconfirmed)
Ferrari Test Bed Car Haas - 21 February
Force India - TBC
Renault - TBC
McLaren - 21 February
Mercedes - TBC
Red Bull - TBC
Sauber - 1 March
Toro Rosso - TBC
Williams - 22 February
Manor - TBC
#4
Posted 20 January 2016 - 04:30 PM
Can't wait for first lights out. Longest winter ever.
#5
Posted 03 February 2016 - 01:49 PM
Renault RS16
#6
Posted 03 February 2016 - 03:34 PM
Send Maldonado a poster sized copy for his bedroom
#7
Posted 17 February 2016 - 11:08 AM
#8
Posted 17 February 2016 - 12:24 PM
#9
Posted 17 February 2016 - 12:44 PM
Im amazed that buttons gone with honda again , in fact I cant believe that mclaren have gone with honda, , they might as well admit the engine or electrics are not going to do the job and start the design process again, button and alonso deserve better, they would be better off cutting a hole in the bottom of the car and fred flintstoning it, unless honda really was using last year as a test, like ALL year
I really don't know where to start with this.
1. It's a multi-year deal. The Red Bull engine sourcing issues have shown how hard it is to get a different engine supplier involved. Mclaren (and RB) realise the only way to beat Mecedes and Ferrari is to have any engine supplier dedicated to their chassis design.
2. Engine units are homologated and major components cannot be changed within a season. Therefore defects with last years engine couldn't be addressed until now.
3. It's not unusual for manufacturers to treat entire seasons as development seasons - see the Toyota TF101 and the BMW E41/1 - http://sd-2.archive-...eurs_BMW_F1.pdf
Edited by fezzasus, 17 February 2016 - 12:48 PM.
#10
Posted 17 February 2016 - 01:41 PM
[color=rgb(40,40,40);font-family:helvetica, arial, sans-serif;]Manor / Mercedes[/color]
[color=rgb(40,40,40);font-family:helvetica, arial, sans-serif;]Pascal Wehrlein / Haryanto [/color]
[color=rgb(40,40,40);font-family:helvetica, arial, sans-serif;]February 22[/color]
#12
Posted 19 February 2016 - 01:04 PM
#13
Posted 19 February 2016 - 01:21 PM
I'm hoping Renault turn there form around
Not this year. It's basically a lower power engine bolted into last years car. Renault bought the team too late to do anything with the chassis for this year.
#14
Posted 19 February 2016 - 01:32 PM
#15
Posted 19 February 2016 - 01:44 PM
#16
Posted 19 February 2016 - 01:47 PM
2009 brawn shows that it can be done
Not a fair comparison.
1) Power train integration is much more complex now
2) Power trains are not mature and clearly have power differences (in contrast to 2009 where they were approximately comparable), Renault engine being one of the worst now.
3) Honda sunk a lot of money into the 2009 development which gave a good foundation for Brawn. Lotus didn't spend any money, and even had to extend the life of parts beyond normal working life to keep racing.
#17
Posted 19 February 2016 - 05:11 PM
#18
Posted 19 February 2016 - 06:29 PM
#19
Posted 19 February 2016 - 07:59 PM
Either way I'd like to see Renault hand it to RedBull after all the acrimonious bitching
To be honest, I think the media were very unfair when reporting on that.
Renault were instrumental in the new engine regulations. They threatened to leave if Formula 1 didn't switch away from V8s to an engine more representative of road technology. At that point, Renault felt like a safe bet. Mercedes clearly did the better job, and Ferrari clearly understood their engine well enough to know how to improve. Both spent money to get to a good product. Renault didn't spend enough money, didn't have enough people, and don't understand how to improve their engine.
With all of that, Red Bull are paying the same price as people receiving Ferrari and Mercedes engines, and getting a worse product. I would be frustrated too, and after a season and a half of it without any improvement, perhaps becoming vocal in the media was their only resort?
#20
Posted 20 February 2016 - 02:26 PM
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: f1
General Discussion →
Off topic Chat →
'grand Prix Driver' On Amazon PrimeStarted by Sutol , 22 Feb 2018 f1 |
|
|
||
f1
General Discussion →
Motorsport →
F1 2018 RacesStarted by siztenboots , 20 Jun 2017 f1 |
|
|
||
f1
General Discussion →
Motorsport →
2017 F1 Car Launch Dates And TestingStarted by siztenboots , 20 Dec 2016 f1 |
|
|
||
f1
General Discussion →
Off topic Chat →
Brazilian F1 Grand Prix - InterlagosStarted by siztenboots , 08 Nov 2016 f1 |
|
|
||
f1
General Discussion →
Off topic Chat →
Mexican F1 Grand Prix - Mexico CityStarted by siztenboots , 26 Oct 2016 f1 |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users