Owning A 911
#1
Posted 08 February 2016 - 07:28 PM
#2
Posted 08 February 2016 - 07:42 PM
Evora HTH
#3
Posted 08 February 2016 - 07:45 PM
I suppose it depends what you want out of it?
#4
Posted 08 February 2016 - 07:57 PM
You hear of some horror stories in terms of engine rebuilds etc... any truth in it?
#6
Posted 08 February 2016 - 08:58 PM
I wouldnt even look at Gen 1 997s or 996s personally. Ask P4cks on here for some advice!
I think I would probably prefer an Evora if really wanting 2 and a bit seats. Would need a bit more time in both to decide but both are pretty good from initial impressions.
Not that many properly decent 4 seat cars available unfortunately.
#7
Posted 08 February 2016 - 09:03 PM
Can you stretch to a 996 turbo? No engine issues
#8
Posted 08 February 2016 - 09:05 PM
Good investment at the moment as well.
#9
Posted 08 February 2016 - 09:08 PM
I suppose it depends what you want out of it?
Requirements:
- I will bond with & drive for the sake of it
- Something I'll use more often than the vx which often gets left at home as it only has 2 seats
- 3-4 track days a year without bankrupting me whilst putting a smile on my face
Things that bother my about a 911
- It'll be boring after the vx
- I'll look like a cock when driving it
- Cost of ownership
- Engine failure
- it's not a vx
- The only cars I've ever really loved have been light weight and nimble
You hear of some horror stories in terms of engine rebuilds etc... any truth in it?
Yes. Lots
#10
Posted 08 February 2016 - 09:18 PM
996 turbo - I want a revvy/sweet NA that I can rev out and enjoy. Maybe a 997.2. Possibly a future classic as the last 911 with steering feel but feels like there's more depreciation to come in the short term.
Evora - too common I'm also not convinced they're any more reliable than a 911 (did someone mention gearbox)
Both are more £££ than in want (will be allowed) to tie up in a car.
EDIT to add: I've always wanted a 911 - it's an itch I will scratch at some point. The Evora just doesn't have that 'pull'. A late E46 M3 probably meets all the requirements but that has subframe issues and has even more of an image issue than the 911.
Edited by Captain Vimes, 08 February 2016 - 09:25 PM.
#11
Posted 08 February 2016 - 09:30 PM
I think a nice E46 has no image problem these days. You can get the subfame inspected or buy one thats had one of the kits installed (not the BMW foam injection "fix") A CS is quite desirable as well if you can find one.
Its a shame in a way you cant get away with 2 seats as the Cayman S is a great car. You get a lot more use out of them at this time of year too.
#12
Posted 08 February 2016 - 09:33 PM
Edited by pete-r, 08 February 2016 - 09:35 PM.
#13
Posted 08 February 2016 - 09:36 PM
Go and drive one, i think you'll find it/them pretty ordinary.
The VX is quite a hard act to follow. they sound quite nice and they go quite well, but in the same way that a fast Golf does.
996 is very dated now, i'd not touch one with a Barge pole. If i really had to it would be a Gen 2 997 (would love a GT3 but they are now silly money).
#14
Posted 08 February 2016 - 09:38 PM
#15
Posted 08 February 2016 - 09:41 PM
I suppose it depends what you want out of it?
Requirements:
- I will bond with & drive for the sake of it
- Something I'll use more often than the vx which often gets left at home as it only has 2 seats
- 3-4 track days a year without bankrupting me whilst putting a smile on my face
Things that bother my about a 911
- It'll be boring after the vx
- I'll look like a cock when driving it
- Cost of ownership
- Engine failure
- it's not a vx
- The only cars I've ever really loved have been light weight and nimble
You hear of some horror stories in terms of engine rebuilds etc... any truth in it?
Yes. Lots
I suspect all the models you can afford will be boring and slow (relatively speaking)
An e46 m3 with brakes and suspension would murder all but the top end 911's, we've proven it.
All with no real issues other than rare subframe mount cracks.
#16
Posted 08 February 2016 - 09:44 PM
#17
Posted 08 February 2016 - 09:46 PM
#18
Posted 08 February 2016 - 09:50 PM
The Evora just doesn't have that 'pull'.
For me, right after driving one when a local dealer had one, i was completely hooked.
it was a thought that didn't go away for nearly a year, in exactly they same way as the vx did in 2004.
I've driven about 250 cars (as a conservative estimate , including about 10 Evoras yes they did make that many) in the meantime and no others have done the same other than the exige v6. very odd.
#19
Posted 08 February 2016 - 09:58 PM
The only non lotus type product to give me the "same" amazing feel was the HuayraFor me, right after driving one when a local dealer had one, i was completely hooked. it was a thought that didn't go away for nearly a year, in exactly they same way as the vx did in 2004. I've driven about 250 cars (as a conservative estimate , including about 10 Evoras yes they did make that many) in the meantime and no others have done the same other than the exige v6. very odd.The Evora just doesn't have that 'pull'.
#20
Posted 08 February 2016 - 09:59 PM
Regarding the turbo take no notice of the above post. The front radiators can be solved from rusting and therefore failing by a simple piece of mesh in front. The engine on the 996turbo and 997 turbo is called the mezger engine and is a masterpiece derived from porsches race engine, no stronger engine anywhere. As for turbos needed rebuilding, well that's no different from any turbo car.
Anything can be solved, but with five rads (OK, three rads and two condensors), any car driven in the wet will accumulate detritus at the bottom of the radiators which causes them to rot. A prudent buyer will wish to see evidence of clutch, radiator and disc changes, otherwise will budget for them.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users