Car Lease
#1
Posted 14 January 2017 - 10:58 AM
#2
Posted 14 January 2017 - 11:43 AM
Does a lease make sense?
There are plenty of cars that have pleateaued on the depreciation curve that will be reliable for 3+ years despite putting on loads of miles. The car that comes to mind for me in the Vauxhall Insigna. Get a 2.0 CDTi for about £5k, run it for about 3 years and sell it for about £5k. Seems much cheaper than paying for a lease and having nothing at the end.
http://www.autotrade...ge=50000&page=1
http://www.autotrade...INSIGNIA&page=2
#3
Posted 14 January 2017 - 12:26 PM
Edited by The Batman, 14 January 2017 - 12:27 PM.
#4
Posted 14 January 2017 - 12:31 PM
#5
Posted 14 January 2017 - 12:42 PM
My brothers Vauxhall insignia with 70k miles on (fsh) engine died. Oil pump failure 1 day after warranty ran out and vauxhall wouldn't do anything!
I think the 2.0 CDTi is mostly reliable, however no engine is completely reliable. Assuming the car is a total loss every 3 years, that still compares pretty well to a lease, for example:
Used 50 k Insignia cost over 3 years = £140 per month
New Golf GTD on 3 year lease with an initial deposit of £5000 = £317.57, or factoring in deposit cost over the same time period. £456 per month
And its an Inspidnia. I mean....just look at it. And that dash!
I'm not saying the Insigna is a fun car, i'm saying it's a low cost option for someone driving a high distance which still gets you a modern car with most of the features you want.
#6
Posted 14 January 2017 - 01:13 PM
#7
Posted 14 January 2017 - 03:05 PM
#8
Posted 14 January 2017 - 03:12 PM
Edited by Wolfstone, 14 January 2017 - 03:14 PM.
#9
Posted 14 January 2017 - 03:19 PM
not surprising. The only way to get good MPG at high speed is to disable the aftertreatment needed for the emission testing. A lot of the diesels coming off the line now are pretty poor for fuel economy - i know someone at work who's trying to hand back their A class diesel because it's so poor.
#10
Posted 14 January 2017 - 03:29 PM
#11
Posted 14 January 2017 - 03:42 PM
I had a 2.4 diesel Alfa 159 for a couple of years. Lovely place to sit in but even on a very long steady journey at 60mph I struggled to get more than 42mpg. And DPF issues galore! I'd never have another diesel.
It's not even the fuel type. At steady state above around 30 mph it becomes a function of the drag coefficient, all engines are good at steady state operation so will be close to their max efficiency. The difference between diesel and gasoline under these conditions is fairly small (but significant for all road freight to use diesel). There is a much greater difference in transient operation such as heavy traffic.
I'm looking to replace my diesel too, but that's mostly because it doesn't even warm up until I get to work.
#12
Posted 14 January 2017 - 03:44 PM
I get 28 from my diesel bimmer already changed the dpf
worst thing is i dont even rag it as i dont want to break it
Edited by The Batman, 14 January 2017 - 03:45 PM.
#13
Posted 14 January 2017 - 04:21 PM
#14
Posted 14 January 2017 - 04:24 PM
#15
Posted 14 January 2017 - 09:09 PM
My current 159 estate is similar as far as results go but my PDF is no more as it clogged every month or so and I had to go for a blast from j21 to 20 and back to get it to regenerate 😡The wasted fuel on these spirited journeys made it an expensive option but remapped it is fineI had a 2.4 diesel Alfa 159 for a couple of years. Lovely place to sit in but even on a very long steady journey at 60mph I struggled to get more than 42mpg. And DPF issues galore! I'd never have another diesel.
Edited by christhegasman, 14 January 2017 - 09:09 PM.
#16
Posted 14 January 2017 - 09:20 PM
My current 159 estate is similar as far as results go but my PDF is no more as it clogged every month or so and I had to go for a blast from j21 to 20 and back to get it to regenerate 😡The wasted fuel on these spirited journeys made it an expensive option but remapped it is fineI had a 2.4 diesel Alfa 159 for a couple of years. Lovely place to sit in but even on a very long steady journey at 60mph I struggled to get more than 42mpg. And DPF issues galore! I'd never have another diesel.
The problem is, these cars were the first generation to have DPFs fitted and they were essentially retrofitted to a engine and chassis not designed for them. The only place to put them is under the rear seats in the gear tunnel, which means they run much cooler and need much more fuel to regen. Latest iterations put the DPF right at the end of the turbo and run much hotter, meaning they tend to regen naturally.
159 location (as well as a lot of DPF implementations in the mid 2000's)
EA288 DPF location (lower canister)
#17
Posted 14 January 2017 - 09:25 PM
Mine was so bad in the end I had to run it every month from Jcn 15 right up to Jcn 22 to force the regen.My current 159 estate is similar as far as results go but my PDF is no more as it clogged every month or so and I had to go for a blast from j21 to 20 and back to get it to regenerate 😡The wasted fuel on these spirited journeys made it an expensive option but remapped it is fineI had a 2.4 diesel Alfa 159 for a couple of years. Lovely place to sit in but even on a very long steady journey at 60mph I struggled to get more than 42mpg. And DPF issues galore! I'd never have another diesel.
#18
Posted 14 January 2017 - 10:31 PM
😳Mine was so bad in the end I had to run it every month from Jcn 15 right up to Jcn 22 to force the regen.My current 159 estate is similar as far as results go but my PDF is no more as it clogged every month or so and I had to go for a blast from j21 to 20 and back to get it to regenerate 😡The wasted fuel on these spirited journeys made it an expensive option but remapped it is fineI had a 2.4 diesel Alfa 159 for a couple of years. Lovely place to sit in but even on a very long steady journey at 60mph I struggled to get more than 42mpg. And DPF issues galore! I'd never have another diesel.
#19
Posted 14 January 2017 - 10:33 PM
Thanks that explains a lot 👍🏻I had never really thought about old and new positions of dpf units
My current 159 estate is similar as far as results go but my PDF is no more as it clogged every month or so and I had to go for a blast from j21 to 20 and back to get it to regenerate 😡The wasted fuel on these spirited journeys made it an expensive option but remapped it is fineI had a 2.4 diesel Alfa 159 for a couple of years. Lovely place to sit in but even on a very long steady journey at 60mph I struggled to get more than 42mpg. And DPF issues galore! I'd never have another diesel.
The problem is, these cars were the first generation to have DPFs fitted and they were essentially retrofitted to a engine and chassis not designed for them. The only place to put them is under the rear seats in the gear tunnel, which means they run much cooler and need much more fuel to regen. Latest iterations put the DPF right at the end of the turbo and run much hotter, meaning they tend to regen naturally.
159 location (as well as a lot of DPF implementations in the mid 2000's)
EA288 DPF location (lower canister)
ts
Edited by christhegasman, 14 January 2017 - 10:35 PM.
#20
Posted 14 January 2017 - 11:38 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users