Jump to content


Photo

Stg.2 Sc Static Noise ?


  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1 Spandex

Spandex

    Member

  • Pip
  • 107 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Herts

Posted 08 May 2017 - 09:22 PM

Anyone got a Stg.2 SC and a recent static test figure ?



#2 pete-r

pete-r

    I never drive faster than I can see

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,771 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South Wales

Posted 08 May 2017 - 09:53 PM

104db at a chilly but not windy car limits. I run quite a loud exhaust though.

#3 The Batman

The Batman

    Super Moderator

  • 30,267 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:FLD mum's bed

Posted 08 May 2017 - 10:04 PM

All depends on exhaust bud

#4 CHILL Gone DUTCH

CHILL Gone DUTCH

    I ADMIT BATMAN THINKS HE IS QUICKER THAN ME

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,727 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK

Posted 08 May 2017 - 10:11 PM

My Tullet always came in between 89Db and 96Db dependant on who tested it and which way wind was blowing

#5 Alastair

Alastair

    Super Duper Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 637 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Robertsbridge, East Sussex

Posted 09 May 2017 - 04:49 AM

92 for me at Rockingham last year with a Tullet.  I was surprised it was that low.... it does sound noisy.  



#6 Spandex

Spandex

    Member

  • Pip
  • 107 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Herts

Posted 09 May 2017 - 07:48 AM

All depends on exhaust bud

 

I'm assuming standard exhaust - also assuming that is even compatible..?



#7 Captain Vimes

Captain Vimes

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,755 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South East
  • Interests:Motorbikes, VX220, Procrastination

Posted 09 May 2017 - 04:28 PM

On my stg2 SC, I get 86/87db with a standard turbo backbox. Standard NA backbox would be similar and is fine on a stage 2. It might cost a couple of bhp but probably not enough to notice through the butt dyno.

#8 Nev

Nev

    Nipper's Minion

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,587 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bristol
  • Interests:Rock climbing, skiing, kayaking, surfing, mountaineering, budgies, chess, practical mechanics.

Posted 10 May 2017 - 11:59 AM

FYI, dB is usually measured using various filters, this has quite a strong effect on the number, so when you state what dB reading you got you should also state the filter, or else it's pretty meaningless.

 

Common filters are A, B & C. On my car at idle for example, when I test I get the following readings:

 

A filter = 92 dB

C filter = 100 dB

 

Different tracks use different filters. You need to ask what filter they used when you get tested.


Edited by Nev, 10 May 2017 - 12:01 PM.


#9 Danny Scarbro

Danny Scarbro

    Member

  • Pip
  • 245 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lincolnshire
  • Interests:Track days!

Posted 11 May 2017 - 08:55 AM

Had mine done at Cadwell yesterday, 2.2, Supercharged, 2.8 pulley Tullett 3" full system.

 

Read 96DB at 4,500rpm.

 

I am unsure of the filter though.

 

Dan



#10 CHILL Gone DUTCH

CHILL Gone DUTCH

    I ADMIT BATMAN THINKS HE IS QUICKER THAN ME

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,727 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK

Posted 11 May 2017 - 09:07 PM

Had mine done at Cadwell yesterday, 2.2, Supercharged, 2.8 pulley Tullett 3" full system.   Read 96DB at 4,500rpm.   I am unsure of the filter though.   Dan

How did you get on ? Did you get close to your target time

#11 Danny Scarbro

Danny Scarbro

    Member

  • Pip
  • 245 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lincolnshire
  • Interests:Track days!

Posted 11 May 2017 - 10:28 PM

It was a cracking day, only timed one session and got a 1.43 but that was with traffic, optimums for the sectors was 1;41 something. Think it's capable of the sub 1:40 time but defo needs some geo and more seat time for that! Am certainly not chucking it around the mountain or hall bends yet so plenty of tim to find hopefully. Dan




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users