ah the same as me
1/12th of a second is the official delay time
Posted 20 May 2017 - 09:53 AM
ah the same as me
1/12th of a second is the official delay time
Posted 20 May 2017 - 09:59 AM
im not 100% but think i set mine to 80mS
Posted 20 May 2017 - 10:00 AM
what did you put the ignition up to in the ignition table
Posted 20 May 2017 - 10:02 AM
Area: 30/40 kPa at 800/1000 rpm upped by 3 degrees from 14/15ish to 17/18ish.
Posted 20 May 2017 - 10:06 AM
have you tried 25 ?
the other thing to try is put the idle ignition to around 4/5ths of what you found is best in the main ignition table
Posted 20 May 2017 - 10:08 AM
do it at 20Kpa also
Posted 20 May 2017 - 11:27 AM
Little update:
Adjusted the fule % corrections in the transient and when pushed all goes to 10.9 afr. Still to rich but better. Adjusted the ignitiontiming in the ignition table and I can pull off in 1st now without touching the throttle. Even revving at idle goes way smoother than it was. Still a tiny hesitationm but we're getting there.
Now the important thing:
AFR delay time:
As you can see, the fuel correction seems to happen a tad after the acc. is pushed. Funny thing is that at the crosshair (10.4 afr) the fueltable allready is at 20kPa/coasting (like the rest of the parameters).
I think that the afr timing is not corresponding with the actual reading. In OBD the delay is set at 90 ms but log delay seems about 1,5 sec. Will ask Peter about this as well.
An answer would be great... so you can tell if the knock is due lean mixture of something else.
So the mixture goes rich when you let go off the throttle, followed by a lean spike. (I assume because of the closed loop correction. Should log fuel trims and IDC with this.)
Fuel evaporating of the walls, so it should inject a tad less when going off throttle?
This is tricky tuning...
Posted 20 May 2017 - 11:55 AM
Posted 20 May 2017 - 01:15 PM
Log injector duty cycle with this, so you can see when more/less fuel is injected in the engine...
(If there is delay in the AFR reading, you should imagine it forwards. Or is OBD delaying the logged AFR?
Posted 21 May 2017 - 07:16 AM
Posted 21 May 2017 - 08:11 AM
Posted 21 May 2017 - 09:50 AM
I thought I'd share this with you guys:
- This is a copy of part of what i sent them for reference, not my whole email -
1. Do you have any data to support the claim that a sensor 36 inches from the turbo creates a noticable delay in data? Would moving the sensor closer provide a more real time reading? Is 36" too far from the engine for reliable realtime data?
2. Being closer will heat negativly affect the readings? Does the copper heat sink theory hold any weight to allow accurate readings?
Anything else that would be helpful to support the 36" from turbo suggest location.
AEM Tech Support-
There is a delay, noticeable is relative but yes... There is a delay. Moving the sensor closer would reduce the life of the sensor, but it would be worth the increase in accuracy. I have seen these copper heat sinks before, but we have not done direct testing for them. My personal thinking on them is they are a bit excessive and don't return any benefit. They will provide small amounts of heat dissipation/insulation, but from what my basic understanding of thermodynamics tells me is there is little to no benefit.
Basically; Moving it closer WILL lower the life, but will provide more accuracy.
Posted 21 May 2017 - 11:29 AM
maybe just play with the delay times until it looks right in the logs then maybe confirming what happens with the gauge
Posted 21 May 2017 - 01:43 PM
Yes so at the moment you have one cell set too 11.4 and the rest at 5.4. So I mean set all cells to 11.4. If the car runs away a bit when coasting reduce the 20kpa cell ignition advance.All other ignition cells in the idle table? That one is now at 11.4 degrees@30kpa. The rest is 5.4 Increasing the ignition in the ignition table helps really well to pull off in 1st.
Posted 21 May 2017 - 02:42 PM
Posted 21 May 2017 - 05:09 PM
Daan, For these transient issues you should also look to the standard O2 sensor, as a narrowband sensor normally reacts faster than a wideband. It's probably also positioned closer to the engine....
Posted 31 May 2017 - 09:29 PM
Posted 31 May 2017 - 09:43 PM
Posted 01 June 2017 - 07:09 AM
Removed the injectors..
#1 had fuel around the o-ring, others didn't..
Ofcourse I spilled some fuel while removing but not in that injector area.
Never had a leaky injector before so... I guess this is the first time? Probably leaking around the o-ring, not leaking as in dripping fuel due to faulty injector. Opinions?
Remember that if you are leaking fuel on that injector that you are also leaking boost. This means that cylinder isn't seeing the correct fueling or the correct amount of charge. I'd recommend buying some new rings (only a few pence) and check the inlet runner port that there isn't any other reason why it might be leaking. It's an easy fix hopefully for you.
Tip: Use a smear of grease on the o-ring circumference before inserting it into the inlet runner, I know they can be very tight which can cause them to tear and twist out of a nice "settled" position.
Good luck.
Edited by Nev, 01 June 2017 - 07:11 AM.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users