It's all very well setting a 15 year old car up on a machine to some pre described spec, but it simply doesn't take into account loads of "real world" things that will offset that geo a LOT as soon as you're moving.
Off the top of my head things a machine set geo does not accommodate for:
1. Tired bushes that deform badly as soon as you load when cornering.
2. A tired rear subframe that is known to flex around a lot (1 to 2 ") - remember your rear wishbones are partly connected to this.
3. Different/wider wheels + tyres that create more grip, and hence more than intended roll and more strain to deflect 2+ dozen bushes and ball joints + links.
4. Different ARBs everyone seems to have. I've recently discovered how detrimental my "uprated" one is for instance.
5. Ride height differences (thus meaning the onset of bump curve is more acute).
6. Where you drive, lots of fast straightish stuff, sweeping long curves or loads of tight bends... all require a diff setup.
These just some of the things why setting your car to a fixed formula isn't as good as actually experimenting. As I have found, the "fast road" setup is not as fast as my own setup. I've even tried asymmetric geometry (where the O/S is deliberately different to the N/s) - the reason being that on B-roads you need to account for the N/s wheel regularly running in gutters that slope away strongly, hence meaning you ideally need more positive camber on the front N/S wheel and possibly a different ride height on that corner to ensure super fast right hand turn in (to avoid hitting the curb you might be inches away from at many leptons). I doubt many of the monkeys at Kwikfuck ever thought of that.
HTH.
Edited by Nev, 20 July 2018 - 03:44 PM.