Turbo Or N.a Which Is The Best Option
#1
Posted 12 September 2018 - 10:16 PM
Many thanks
#2
Posted 12 September 2018 - 10:25 PM
#3
Posted 12 September 2018 - 10:29 PM
Drive both and decide
The problem is most aren't standard any more, you're close to me and a few others so i'm sure we can organise a get together
#4
Posted 13 September 2018 - 12:02 AM
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#5
Posted 13 September 2018 - 06:02 AM
I have tried out NA not yet turbo.
What am I driving now. Daily, Macan Turbo. Classic fun MG RV8, sometimes Golf GTI. Understand a VX is a totally different concept but I like a variety and any car that's unique/different.
#6
Posted 13 September 2018 - 08:57 AM
an NA is best for wringing out on the country lanes
lalalalalallalalalallalaaa
anyone else got an opinion?
#8
Posted 13 September 2018 - 09:27 AM
#9
Posted 13 September 2018 - 09:31 AM
#10
Posted 13 September 2018 - 09:53 AM
Which characteristics being so different, i do not see why a maintenance thing done maybe once or twice in it's lifetime should be the key decission factor.
#11
Posted 13 September 2018 - 10:04 AM
Turbo simply because the cambelt is much easier to maintain than having to do the chains on the 2.2
How often do you have to do the belt and how often do you have to do the chain?
Edited by fiveoclock, 13 September 2018 - 10:04 AM.
#12
Posted 13 September 2018 - 10:06 AM
Which characteristics being so different, i do not see why a maintenance thing done maybe once or twice in it's lifetime should be the key decission factor.
If it is then get a bicycle. You can change the chain in two minutes
#13
Posted 13 September 2018 - 07:59 PM
You wont be dissapointed with either.
Ive had both, NA first and thought it was fast then got use to it.
Then got turbo thought it was fast then got use to it
Increased power of Turbo thought it was fast then got use to it!
So... Get an NA but dont drive a turbo!
#14
Posted 14 September 2018 - 08:51 AM
#15
Posted 15 September 2018 - 10:20 AM
There's a small chance I might be selling my own 2.2 Road car (13k dry weather car probably the best one there is in terms of condition) Contemplating purchasing a unit. Undecided at the moment but an easy sale might just sway me
#16
Posted 16 September 2018 - 10:32 AM
Turbo simply because the cambelt is much easier to maintain than having to do the chains on the 2.2
How often do you have to do the belt and how often do you have to do the chain?
vxT belt and water pump = every four years
2.2 chain = every ten years, but many vx220s have done fifteen years or more !
Amount of hassle is the same for both jobs
#17
Posted 16 September 2018 - 04:38 PM
There's a small chance I might be selling my own 2.2 Road car (13k dry weather car probably the best one there is in terms of condition) Contemplating purchasing a unit. Undecided at the moment but an easy sale might just sway me
Too nice to sell Jon, keep it :-)
How's the 911 project going?
#18
Posted 16 September 2018 - 06:07 PM
#19
Posted 15 October 2018 - 05:43 PM
Iv bought a 2001 VX220 (non turbo) 3 months ago and am now totally in love with it. i bought it as an origanal car and as an investment. I wanted simplicity so therfore didn't go for the turbo. If you fit a surpercharger to my car you can get up to 260bhp, I thinks that's far more than anybody wants for a road car
alan
#20
Posted 15 October 2018 - 07:04 PM
I've had both variants, I've previously owned an N/A and I currently own a Turbo, "which is the best option" To be honest there's nowt much wrong with an N/A but to put it simply the Turbo is without a doubt miles better.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users