Z20let Versus C20let
Started by
NewbieGuy
, Apr 18 2005 03:35 PM
5 replies to this topic
#1
NewbieGuy
-
-
- 36 posts
Member
Posted 18 April 2005 - 03:35 PM
Any tech-heads out there care to talk engines to me? I probly won't understand but I like the sound of it
#2
caleebra
-
-
- 4,479 posts
Scary Internerd
- Gender:Male
- Location:Aberdeen
Posted 18 April 2005 - 03:55 PM
The C20LET was basically a turbocharged version of the fab C20XE 
I'm not sure if the Z20LET was in turn basicaly a turbocharged version of the 2.0 16V Ecotec (Z20XE) and I'm not sure what the differences are between C and Z,but there must've been a fair amount of development to meet emissions regulations.
Maybe these sites can help, because I have clearly been of zero assistance
:
C20 LET http://www.max-boost.co.uk/max-boost/
Z20 LET http://www.zlet.co.uk
I'm not sure if the Z20LET was in turn basicaly a turbocharged version of the 2.0 16V Ecotec (Z20XE) and I'm not sure what the differences are between C and Z,but there must've been a fair amount of development to meet emissions regulations.Maybe these sites can help, because I have clearly been of zero assistance
:C20 LET http://www.max-boost.co.uk/max-boost/
Z20 LET http://www.zlet.co.uk
Edited by caleebra, 19 April 2005 - 07:27 AM.
turbocharged 
#4
caleebra
-
-
- 4,479 posts
Scary Internerd
- Gender:Male
- Location:Aberdeen
Posted 19 April 2005 - 07:27 AM
Who said Supercharged?
(
must have supercharger on the brain)
(
must have supercharger on the brain)
#5
NewbieGuy
-
-
- 36 posts
Member
Posted 19 April 2005 - 07:59 AM
Thanks for that. Now, how does the Z20let compare with the NA engine in terms of age/history?
#6
paulb
-
-
- 1,598 posts
Billy No Mates
- Location:Cambridgeshire
- Interests:Driving, wildlife photography, travel
Posted 19 April 2005 - 08:42 AM
It's an old pigiron heap.
The 2.2 is a pretty modern, all alloy, lightweight engine
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
