

Bmw 1 Series
#1
Posted 15 October 2005 - 05:25 PM

#2
Posted 15 October 2005 - 05:52 PM



#3
Posted 15 October 2005 - 06:34 PM
#4
Posted 15 October 2005 - 07:57 PM
I was suprised too - EVO rated it, but on German roads. Think I need to try it minus wife and on a longer drive. Part of it I think was lack of noise - it probably qucker than it felt - one of the nice things about the vx (for which there is no substitute!)surprised about the 130i as its had rave reviews from all the mags
the only other thing is its so bloody expensive for what it is
oh and its a beemer
Paul
#5
Posted 16 October 2005 - 10:54 AM
#6
Posted 16 October 2005 - 04:28 PM
#7
Posted 16 October 2005 - 04:37 PM
I'm with you on this onequite simply there is no substitute to a vx

#8
Posted 16 October 2005 - 06:47 PM
Depends on your driving position I guess. We did check and my wife can sit behind me driving, which is fine I guess. We did the same check in the A3 and it's pretty much identical - actually the A3 is "clever" there are some dents in the back of the front seats to provide a little more room. The acid test is can you put a rear facing baby seat in the back OK - we'll be checking that this week, but again the A3 was fine behind the passenger, but would be a push behind me driving. Strangely our perception (backed up by the lass in the nursery shop) is that the A4 is marginly worse than the A3 for rear legroom. And will we still be driving these when our little one's a teenager? Get to that point and we'll give in and by a fuel cell MPV!It might not be important to you but check the rear leg room, its ok for babies in car seats, but thats about it.
My 12 year old daughter, wasnt happy, and she`s tiny.
I suspect that these cars are all very close and the differences are in cm. For example the boot on the BM is small (330 litres), but that's not far off the golf gti at 350, which will be less in the R32 - The A3 Quattro (300) loses 70 litres from the boot over the FWD version (370).
So one review says it's the BMW is cramped and another praises the A3 for space - and they're damn near identical.
Anyway am going to try another drive in the 130i - a bit longer this time - and see if I can see it's merits. If the VX has to go, then trading to another which is pretty quick has got to be some consolation. BMW claim 8:35 for the 'ring which puts it in reasonable company...
Lotus Exige ( 8/2004) 8:32
BMW Z4 3.0 SMG ( 5/2003) 8:32
BMW M Roadster ( 9/1997) 8:32
Porsche Boxster S ( 12/1999) 8:32
Opel Speedster Turbo ( 4/2004) 8:34
BMW Z3 Coupé 3.0i ( 4/2001) 8:34
Brabus-Mercedes C V8 Coupé ( 2/2002) 8:35
Porsche Boxster ( 3/2003) 8:36
BMW M3 SMG ( 3/1997) 8:35
BMW Alpina B3 3.3 ( 7/1999) 8:36
VW Golf R32 ( 2/2003) 8:37
from Some 'Ring times...
Paul
Edited by pcmanning, 16 October 2005 - 06:49 PM.
#9
Posted 17 October 2005 - 03:53 PM
#10
Posted 17 October 2005 - 03:57 PM
#11
Posted 17 October 2005 - 03:58 PM
LOL.. spot the newbiequite simply there is no substitute to a vx

#12
Posted 17 October 2005 - 04:16 PM

#13
Posted 17 October 2005 - 05:15 PM
Cos it's another FWD hot hatch - very nice, but it'll just understeer on some of my favorite bendsHate to sound dull but if you're after a hot hatch which is relatively sensible, why not look the way of the civic type-r?
Bigger in the back, nearly as quick, half the cost, and twice as reliable.
And its not a BMW. Why waste your money on a bonnet badge?

BMW - I'm not looking at the badge - I'm looking at the chassis/drive/handling (and build quality) - look beyond the badge that's what we say on here isn't it?!!
Just been out and cleaned both cars, took the vx up the road to "shake the water off" - it's irreplaceable isn't it. Came in and looked so sad that wify said why don't you keep it - I love her (my wife - ok and the car!!)
Maybe
Paul
#14
Posted 18 October 2005 - 08:49 PM
Well if its nothing to do with the badge, why are you only looking at teutonic hatches?Cos it's another FWD hot hatch - very nice, but it'll just understeer on some of my favorite bendsHate to sound dull but if you're after a hot hatch which is relatively sensible, why not look the way of the civic type-r?
Bigger in the back, nearly as quick, half the cost, and twice as reliable.
And its not a BMW. Why waste your money on a bonnet badge?
BMW - I'm not looking at the badge - I'm looking at the chassis/drive/handling (and build quality) - look beyond the badge that's what we say on here isn't it?!!
Just been out and cleaned both cars, took the vx up the road to "shake the water off" - it's irreplaceable isn't it. Came in and looked so sad that wify said why don't you keep it - I love her (my wife - ok and the car!!)
Maybe
Paul
Fail to believe that the 130i is going to allow you to powerslide round a corner whereas the civic will understeer into the verge at the side of the road. 99 times of of 100 you wouldn't notice the difference in the drive, and a compromised package for that 1 in 100 moment seems a waste
I've been in both, and don't think theres any significant difference in 'build quality' - ie cost of the interior plastics. But Honda reliability (REAL mark of build quality) will leave BMW/Audi/VW trailing.
If you really cannot have a front wheel drive, why not skoda vrs. 4 wheel drive admittedly but still half the cost of the beemer.
But the badge isn't an issue I'm sure

#15
Posted 19 October 2005 - 08:31 AM
#16
Posted 19 October 2005 - 02:38 PM
#17
Posted 19 October 2005 - 04:52 PM



#18
Posted 20 October 2005 - 11:46 AM


#19
Posted 20 October 2005 - 12:07 PM
I know - I've always wanted one too - but if I'm inclined done the "previously enjoyed" route, I'd like something with at least a years warrenty left. And I bet they drink fuel like anything!Audi RS4
![]()
Paul
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users