Speedster 2.0 Na Project.
#1
Posted 28 June 2010 - 07:23 PM
#2
Posted 28 June 2010 - 07:47 PM
#3
Posted 28 June 2010 - 10:07 PM
#4
Posted 28 June 2010 - 10:13 PM
#5
Posted 29 June 2010 - 06:42 AM
#6
Posted 29 June 2010 - 07:22 AM
#7
Posted 29 June 2010 - 07:45 AM
Yes, I think it´s called B207. It´s basicly the same engine as the Speedster/VX220 2.2 with a shorter stroke, lower comp-ratio and a turbocharger.
Yes. I have the same block in the garage, but it's the US 2.0LSJ supercharged version.
Same 9,5 CR etc. Look in the US for LSJ parts like pistons etc. It has an 8 bolt crank and should be the same pattern as the older C20XE/LET flywheels. As said, 60-2 trigger will work with Z20LET or the US LSJ ecu's. Or fully stand-alone if you ditch the ETB.
#8
Posted 29 June 2010 - 12:12 PM
#9
Posted 29 June 2010 - 02:38 PM
Edited by alanoo, 29 June 2010 - 02:41 PM.
#10
Posted 29 June 2010 - 03:02 PM
#11
Posted 29 June 2010 - 03:05 PM
...
then I found the stupid crank was a 4 counterweigths stuff so it was useless for that application...
Why is 4 counterweights useless? I kinda liked the idea of a lighter crank, both for revs and the weight og the car.
#12
Posted 29 June 2010 - 04:25 PM
If you fit a 2.2 crank into the 2.0 block you need to check that the pistons don't hit the oil jets
Or just
...
then I found the stupid crank was a 4 counterweigths stuff so it was useless for that application...
Why is 4 counterweights useless? I kinda liked the idea of a lighter crank, both for revs and the weight og the car.
Crap at high rpm, bad dynamic balance, bhp loss, heavy crank torsion, bearing load and so on...
Edited by alanoo, 29 June 2010 - 04:25 PM.
#13
Posted 29 June 2010 - 04:42 PM
If you fit a 2.2 crank into the 2.0 block you need to check that the pistons don't hit the oil jets
Or justDremeltweak the pistons
...
then I found the stupid crank was a 4 counterweigths stuff so it was useless for that application...
Why is 4 counterweights useless? I kinda liked the idea of a lighter crank, both for revs and the weight og the car.
Crap at high rpm, bad dynamic balance, bhp loss, heavy crank torsion, bearing load and so on...
When you say high rpm, do you mean 8000 or 10000? How do you know the dynamic balance is bad? Are you speaking about this crank specially or cranks with 4 counterweigths in general?
#14
Posted 29 June 2010 - 04:48 PM
#15
Posted 01 July 2010 - 03:17 PM
#16
Posted 01 July 2010 - 09:09 PM
I'm currently building a hybrid 2.2 Saab engine using a z22yh crank (so it can run a vxT ecu), so if you need to know anything just ask
Do you have a drawing showing the 2.2 triggerwheel pattern? I guess it is possible to make one to fit to the Saab-crank also.
I measured the rods yesterday, and they are 145,8mm long. Eagle has rods for the 2.2 wich are 146.4 long, and that is perfect with a set of custom pistons.
Edit: A stock rod weighs 650g, piston with rings 385g and the 23mm pin is 150g. The Eagle rods are 520g.
Edited by Geir Haugen, 01 July 2010 - 09:55 PM.
#17
Posted 02 July 2010 - 08:12 AM
#18
Posted 02 July 2010 - 09:14 AM
I'm currently building a hybrid 2.2 Saab engine using a z22yh crank (so it can run a vxT ecu), so if you need to know anything just ask
Do you have a drawing showing the 2.2 triggerwheel pattern? I guess it is possible to make one to fit to the Saab-crank also.
I measured the rods yesterday, and they are 145,8mm long. Eagle has rods for the 2.2 wich are 146.4 long, and that is perfect with a set of custom pistons.
Edit: A stock rod weighs 650g, piston with rings 385g and the 23mm pin is 150g. The Eagle rods are 520g.
Why do you want to use Eagle 2,2 rods on your 2.0 engine?? (The Saab/LSJ rods are pretty strong, but maybe to heavy for your purpose?)
In the US you can buy lots of engine stuff for the 2.0LSJ block, which is basically a Saab B207 with supercharger.
Saab (and LSJ) have a 60-2 trigger wheel which is bolted onto the crank. You can make a 7-1 wheel for the Z22SE ecu, but that is a p.i.t.a. to map. I should stick to the 60-2 and use a different (Z20LET?) ECU
Edited by Exmantaa, 02 July 2010 - 09:17 AM.
#19
Posted 02 July 2010 - 09:32 AM
I'm currently building a hybrid 2.2 Saab engine using a z22yh crank (so it can run a vxT ecu), so if you need to know anything just ask
Do you have a drawing showing the 2.2 triggerwheel pattern? I guess it is possible to make one to fit to the Saab-crank also.
I measured the rods yesterday, and they are 145,8mm long. Eagle has rods for the 2.2 wich are 146.4 long, and that is perfect with a set of custom pistons.
Edit: A stock rod weighs 650g, piston with rings 385g and the 23mm pin is 150g. The Eagle rods are 520g.
Why do you want to use Eagle 2,2 rods on your 2.0 engine?? (The Saab/LSJ rods are pretty strong, but maybe to heavy for your purpose?)
In the US you can buy lots of engine stuff for the 2.0LSJ block, which is basically a Saab B207 with supercharger.
Saab (and LSJ) have a 60-2 trigger wheel which is bolted onto the crank. You can make a 7-1 wheel for the Z22SE ecu, but that is a p.i.t.a. to map. I should stick to the 60-2 and use a different (Z20LET?) ECU
The Eagle rods are lighter, and suports a lighter pin.(20mm instead of 23mm)Theyare also cheap. I think I need a custom piston either way, I cant find a high cr piston for the LSJ. When it comes to ecu, I have not decidet yet. There are a intersting project going on here: http://www.verboom.n...u/obdtuner.html It looks very prommising, but has no release-date yet.
#20
Posted 02 July 2010 - 11:09 AM
The Eagle rods are lighter, and suports a lighter pin.(20mm instead of 23mm)Theyare also cheap. I think I need a custom piston either way, I cant find a high cr piston for the LSJ. When it comes to ecu, I have not decidet yet. There are a intersting project going on here: http://www.verboom.n...u/obdtuner.html It looks very prommising, but has no release-date yet.
you can get a 10:1 piston for the LSJ and then skim the head down by ~1mm to get up to 11:1
Anyone know if the crank trigger patter 60-2 for the Z20NET, as it's essntially the same engine as the b207, just a bit easier/cheaper to get hold of?
Edited by Winstar, 02 July 2010 - 11:10 AM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users