Edited by Exmantaa, 28 April 2011 - 10:31 AM.

Air Box
#21
Posted 28 April 2011 - 10:31 AM
#22
Posted 28 April 2011 - 10:33 AM
#23
Posted 28 April 2011 - 10:34 AM
Going with a modified NA airbox. Consensus from those who understand these things is that the NA airbox is actually able to flow more air than the turbo version. Will hopefully dampen some of the sound waves that come back out of the compressor when the throttle is open and bounce them around in the airbox instead of shooting them straight back out of the cone filter.I think techie was looking into fitting a turbo one... Not sure what the outcome on that was though
P.S. Measured 90.0db @4000rpm on the Cadwell static test yesterday with the new Tullett swap-in silencer/cat replacement.

#24
Posted 28 April 2011 - 10:36 AM

#25
Posted 28 April 2011 - 10:36 AM
P.S. Measured 90.0db @4000rpm on the Cadwell static test yesterday with the new Tullett swap-in silencer/cat replacement.
Sounds like they've finally made it work then.
#26
Posted 28 April 2011 - 10:40 AM
#27
Posted 28 April 2011 - 10:42 AM
#28
Posted 28 April 2011 - 10:43 AM
Yep. Still can't believe it, as it sounds much louder to me, in the car.
P.S. Measured 90.0db @4000rpm on the Cadwell static test yesterday with the new Tullett swap-in silencer/cat replacement.
Sounds like they've finally made it work then.
So that's been 96.2db @ 5400rpm at Snetterton last month and 90.0db @ 4000rpm yesterday at Cadwell. Still a little unrealistic as it's not under load and the charger isn't doing it's impression of a siren during a static test but can't see it getting any better than that.
Impressions from those that I drive by is that the exhaust noise is not so much loud as just very deep sounding. Oh and yep, it does belch out a flame on the overrun on track.

#29
Posted 28 April 2011 - 10:44 AM
Yep, dynomat is brilliant but fecking heavy.Is it still called dynomat? That is One of the best stuff i know off but i think techies idea will be best

#30
Posted 28 April 2011 - 10:47 AM


#31
Posted 28 April 2011 - 10:50 AM

#32
Posted 28 April 2011 - 10:54 AM

#33
Posted 28 April 2011 - 03:31 PM

#34
Posted 28 April 2011 - 03:33 PM
#35
Posted 30 April 2011 - 08:47 AM
I always wanted to fit a mk2 Clio V6 airbox on mine, as it is one of the biggest OEM airboxes available and used on many RenaultSport racing cars (Clio Cup, Clio R3...)
Big isn't always better it depends if the design allows all the filter to be utilised and how the flow is slowed down/spread out to pass through the filter and then accelerated again. It does look like a decent design but one that induces swirl in the flow to accommodate the inlet and outlet angles.
The outer shape of the NA airbox is good for promoting even flow however it was ruined by the cone and internal pipe. I noticed this when I first changed my air filer which was heavily loaded in the area where the internal pipe exited into the lower plenum. Since I modified the box to the filter loading has been perfectly even (also can't say I really noticed any dip in torque and it seemed better at the top end). The only bit that really needs some work is all the square edges that are left over when you unclip the cone.
Edited by Winstar, 30 April 2011 - 08:48 AM.
#36
Posted 30 April 2011 - 11:19 AM

#37
Posted 30 April 2011 - 12:35 PM

Edited by smiley, 30 April 2011 - 12:36 PM.
#38
Posted 02 May 2011 - 05:36 PM
Big isn't always better it depends if the design allows all the filter to be utilised and how the flow is slowed down/spread out to pass through the filter and then accelerated again. It does look like a decent design but one that induces swirl in the flow to accommodate the inlet and outlet angles.
The outer shape of the NA airbox is good for promoting even flow however it was ruined by the cone and internal pipe. I noticed this when I first changed my air filer which was heavily loaded in the area where the internal pipe exited into the lower plenum. Since I modified the box to the filter loading has been perfectly even (also can't say I really noticed any dip in torque and it seemed better at the top end). The only bit that really needs some work is all the square edges that are left over when you unclip the cone.
I agree, my point wasn't "fit the biggest you could find".
I am still using a modified OE box, with twin inlet pipes (with trumpets/velocity stacks, not bare pipes), removed cone and a very short trumpet glued to replace it, and a (real) F1 air filter.
It still gives me 15 to 20 mbar more vacuum at load compared to without the airbox

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users