Jump to content


Photo

Z32Se - Anyone Thought About / Tried It?


  • Please log in to reply
29 replies to this topic

#1 Rosssco

Rosssco

    Scary Internerd

  • 4,185 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Aberdeen

Posted 06 June 2011 - 11:38 AM

Has anyone attempted or put serious thought into this engine approach? I realise from a purely performance per pound perspective, its not quite as competive as the traditional turbo / SC 2.2 route, but it ticks a few boxes from me... I would think mechanically, it would fit relatively simply (bolts to the F23?) and it doesn't seem to be a excessively complex engine with dual VVT or such like. packaging wise, I would think engine height and width would be tight certainly, but nothing too bad here. A lightly tweaked version will give 230-240bhp (210bhp standard) and similar torque figures (with tons from tickover) , will be equally reliable, sound great etc. I would estimate weight to be somewhere between the Z22SE and the Z20LET (~160kg for a modern all-alloy V6) so can't see excessive weight being a problem. Thoughts on the matter? Ross

#2 vocky

vocky

    Moderator

  • 11,969 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Earth

Posted 06 June 2011 - 02:15 PM

3.2 V6 engine weighs quite a bit more than a z22se, but probably similar to a turbo lump :unsure: I'm sure it could work and perhaps one day someone will fit one

#3 Nev

Nev

    Nipper's Minion

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,587 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bristol
  • Interests:Rock climbing, skiing, kayaking, surfing, mountaineering, budgies, chess, practical mechanics.

Posted 06 June 2011 - 03:03 PM

It sounds like a good idea to me. A high torque figure from 1000 revs would be nice. I wonder if a supercharger kit exists for it ?!

#4 Seb.F

Seb.F

    Under Your Bed

  • 6,045 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Northants
  • Interests:Tech head

Posted 06 June 2011 - 03:04 PM

Would be quite a project for someone mad enough to take it on. The problem being there are far too many 'easy' options to get more torques, so can imagine noone would bother.

#5 Phear

Phear

    Need to get Out More

  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,125 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bromsgrove

Posted 06 June 2011 - 03:25 PM

Gotta be easier than a Rover V8 conversion, and thats been done :)

#6 Paulus H

Paulus H

    Evil Triumphs When Good Men Do Nothing

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,063 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:DE65 5NX
  • Interests:I really appreciate my car. I have piled on 100,000 miles in 8 years of ownership. I still love every day I get in it

Posted 06 June 2011 - 03:43 PM

I wonder if a gas turbine/electric hybrid would be a better solution - along the lines of the Jaguar C-X75 Concept. A much more compact powerplant and with plenty potential for setting up active torque vectoring if using one electric motor per wheel. Seriously though, the V6 sounds like fun for someone who enjoys a challenge. Each to their own. Good luck if you decide to go for it!! Paul

#7 Phear

Phear

    Need to get Out More

  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,125 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bromsgrove

Posted 06 June 2011 - 03:48 PM

2 problems with turbines. Firstly the exhaust gases are extremely hot and come out extremely fast, dangerous to passers by! Secondly the noise is mental!

#8 Zoobeef

Zoobeef

    Joes bedroom assistant.

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,103 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Retford/Bovington

Posted 06 June 2011 - 03:52 PM

2 problems with turbines. Firstly the exhaust gases are extremely hot and come out extremely fast, dangerous to passers by! Secondly the noise is mental!


Thats why they should be restricted to pushbikes :P That was the plan this summer if i had it spare

#9 FLD

FLD

    WANNABE MY LOVER

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,717 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Near nantwich
  • Interests:Tugging my todger.

Posted 06 June 2011 - 04:45 PM

Engines around that capacity tend to be lazy. They dont have the revvy nature of a smaller 4 pot yet dont have the torque of a big V8. With a light VX a fast, responive engine is usually prefered. It can come down to preference and driving style. I had a 3.1 V6 once upon a time and I found that nice to drive. ETA: Personally I'm waiting for someone to fit a 4 rotor mazda rotary engine.

Edited by FLD, 06 June 2011 - 04:46 PM.


#10 joshua

joshua

    Member

  • 180 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bath

Posted 06 June 2011 - 05:45 PM

I'm working with a guy who has an Audi R32 v6 in his Elise s1 He's promised me a spin in it next weekend. :jump:

#11 DarrylB

DarrylB

    Billy No Mates

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,629 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Just outside Uxbridge

Posted 06 June 2011 - 05:53 PM

Personally I'm waiting for someone to fit a 4 rotor mazda rotary engine.


THIS ^^^ would be mental! noise would be immense (along with the fuel consumption)

#12 Rosssco

Rosssco

    Scary Internerd

  • 4,185 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Aberdeen

Posted 06 June 2011 - 06:06 PM

3.2 V6 engine weighs quite a bit more than a z22se, but probably similar to a turbo lump :unsure:


Yes, no doubt it wouldn't be comparable to alloy 4-pot, but quite a few alloy V6's seem to compare favorably with iron-block 4-cylinder turbo unit from what I've seen.

Would be quite a project for someone mad enough to take it on. The problem being there are far too many 'easy' options to get more torques, so can imagine noone would bother.


Absolutely agree with respect to easy torque, and I've already bought a few bits for a Stage 1 SC just in case :rolleyes: Its about power / torque delivery as well though, for which for I prefer NA or SC. It all really depends how easy it would fit ...

Engines around that capacity tend to be lazy. They dont have the revvy nature of a smaller 4 pot yet dont have the torque of a big V8. With a light VX a fast, responive engine is usually prefered. It can come down to preference and driving style. I had a 3.1 V6 once upon a time and I found that nice to drive.

ETA: Personally I'm waiting for someone to fit a 4 rotor mazda rotary engine.


Everyone likes a wankel! Me included...

Re: V6's, I think it depends on the engine, specific application and state of tune, granted in standard form with a DMF and stuck in a Vectra, its probably no motorbike engine. A decent sized V6 with lightweight flywheel and not much weight to move will rev pretty freely. The VQ35 in my old 350Z reeved pretty well, and that had a chunk of a car to move.

Oh and don't get me started on V8's...:sleepy:

#13 moospeed

moospeed

    Billy No Mates

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,401 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wigmore, Kent

Posted 06 June 2011 - 06:10 PM

I'm working with a guy who has an Audi R32 v6 in his Elise s1

He's promised me a spin in it next weekend. :jump:

Matt black JSD car?

#14 moospeed

moospeed

    Billy No Mates

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,401 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wigmore, Kent

Posted 06 June 2011 - 06:15 PM

Might also be worth mentioning woodsport, v6 converters of MR2s. They have a build blog going right now on seloc. Can't see why that wouldn't fit - in fact, more likely to compared with an Elise no?

#15 Rosssco

Rosssco

    Scary Internerd

  • 4,185 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Aberdeen

Posted 06 June 2011 - 06:16 PM

I'm working with a guy who has an Audi R32 v6 in his Elise s1

He's promised me a spin in it next weekend. :jump:


Woodsport are getting on with their Toyota V6 into Elise swappage...

http://www.twobrutal...tus-Elise/page3

#16 Rosssco

Rosssco

    Scary Internerd

  • 4,185 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Aberdeen

Posted 06 June 2011 - 06:20 PM

Might also be worth mentioning woodsport, v6 converters of MR2s. They have a build blog going right now on seloc.

Can't see why that wouldn't fit - in fact, more likely to compared with an Elise no?


Yeah I've got 2 MR2's, and bought 2x Toyota V6's in the past, but never fitted them. I've a ~350hp Toyota 3S-GTE engine / gearbox package I'm going to sell, maybe I should look to 'lob' that in :closedeyes: and forget about all this V6 malarky! :flame:

#17 FLD

FLD

    WANNABE MY LOVER

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,717 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Near nantwich
  • Interests:Tugging my todger.

Posted 06 June 2011 - 08:19 PM

You want one of these:
Posted Image

Mega power, mega revvy BUT mega expensive to make road drivable and mega expensive to rebuild.

#18 slindborg

slindborg

    The Bishop of Stortford

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,602 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:.

Posted 06 June 2011 - 08:31 PM

Posted Image

This even has its own subframe, so its literally 8 bolts......and a fcuk load of bodywork to get 700bhp and mega torque in there :lol:

#19 FLD

FLD

    WANNABE MY LOVER

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,717 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Near nantwich
  • Interests:Tugging my todger.

Posted 06 June 2011 - 08:34 PM

Mine was straight forward in a mk2 'scort. 2 bolts on the engine mounts and the gearbox mount and haul the beast out. Had a T56 attatched which weighs a ton!

#20 slindborg

slindborg

    The Bishop of Stortford

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,602 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:.

Posted 06 June 2011 - 08:49 PM

Mine was straight forward in a mk2 'scort. 2 bolts on the engine mounts and the gearbox mount and haul the beast out. Had a T56 attatched which weighs a ton!



pretty much a jet engine then and the 4pot was simply there to start it :lol:




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users