Jump to content


Photo

2.2 Na Exhaust - Tuning With Standard Back Box


  • Please log in to reply
32 replies to this topic

#1 Captain Vimes

Captain Vimes

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,755 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South East
  • Interests:Motorbikes, VX220, Procrastination

Posted 22 January 2013 - 11:01 PM

I'm new to vx ownership and the snow outside means that I've spent more time reading this site than driving the car.... which inevitably means that I now want to mod the car. I'd like to keep the car na but would like to add a bit more sparkle at the top of the rev range. BUT I would also like to be able to take the car to Bedford autodrome without blowing the sound meters as its one of my favourite circuits. Many of the modded NA's only seem to make a little extra power until the exhaust manifold is swapped for something decent (tullet) which makes me wonder whether the back box is really that bad. See dyno in this thread for what I mean: http://www.vx220.org...d-so-which-cat/ So now I've waffled for ages.... Has anyone replaced the individual bits of the exhaust and measured the effect they have on power (manifold, cat, back box)? When does the Standard back box start to become a bottle neck? P.S I've had aftermarket turbos and sc cars before and don't want all the hassle of remapping and the constant niggles that come with it. Plus I ride a 1000cc bike so get acceleration kicks there - the car is about handling.

#2 smiley

smiley

    Thetan level 15

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,427 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted 22 January 2013 - 11:09 PM

You can get better results on air intake part then exaust part. Read up i would advise.

#3 Captain Vimes

Captain Vimes

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,755 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South East
  • Interests:Motorbikes, VX220, Procrastination

Posted 22 January 2013 - 11:18 PM

Sorry, I should have mentioned that I'm not looking to only replace the manifold/cat. Let's assume that the intake side is as good as it can be, the head is ported, cams are swapped etc. and we focus only on the exhaust for now.

#4 fezzasus

fezzasus

    Whipping Boy

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,689 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oxford

Posted 22 January 2013 - 11:41 PM

Sorry, I should have mentioned that I'm not looking to only replace the manifold/cat. Let's assume that the intake side is as good as it can be, the head is ported, cams are swapped etc. and we focus only on the exhaust for now.


But... It's not, so it seems a bit pointless to hypothesise otherwise.

#5 Captain Vimes

Captain Vimes

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,755 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South East
  • Interests:Motorbikes, VX220, Procrastination

Posted 23 January 2013 - 12:04 AM

I appreciate you're trying to help. Not sure how else to ask a simple question.... The standard exhaust restricts the performance of the engine even with the standard intake system; both courtenay and thorney tuning kits replace the exhaust system without really touching the intake side with proven power increases (even if it's not the cheapest first step - it shows that it IS a restriction in standard guise). So the question I have is, which part of the standard exhaust is most restrictive? From all the reading that I have done my guess is that the standard manifold and cat restricts more than the exhaust box.

#6 Captain Vimes

Captain Vimes

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,755 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South East
  • Interests:Motorbikes, VX220, Procrastination

Posted 23 January 2013 - 12:08 AM

Fezzasus - off topic but the heater you've produced looks great. I may have to invest in one if you do another run later in the year....

#7 smiley

smiley

    Thetan level 15

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,427 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted 23 January 2013 - 12:19 AM

Yes, 4-2-1 or 4-1 outlet manifold, and precat out at least. Cat section (default 400 cells) swap for 200 or 100 cells. Weather or not swapping default 2" to 2.5" sort of depends where you´re aiming for.

Edited by smiley, 23 January 2013 - 12:20 AM.


#8 chris_uk

chris_uk

    I Fancy Joe

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,062 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Leeds UK

Posted 23 January 2013 - 08:05 AM

Buy my full 2.5" exhaust system. Its a 4-1 tullet manifold and piper downpipe/backbox.

#9 vocky

vocky

    Moderator

  • 11,969 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Earth

Posted 23 January 2013 - 08:22 AM

the standard manifold is rubbish (you could gain 5-10bhp changing it to a 4-1), the downpipe is too small and the standard cat restrictive (you could gain 2-5bhp changing it to a sports cat with 2.5" pipework) and the U bend is very restrictive (you could gain bhp by changing that to a 2.5" pipe) I was quite surprised by how much difference the 2.5" U bend made.

#10 slindborg

slindborg

    The Bishop of Stortford

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22,602 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:.

Posted 23 January 2013 - 08:29 AM

The bits that most of the 'chooooners' change on the exhaust do very little in the grand scheme of things (particularly when you compare gain VS cost), The key is the manifold and U bend, everything else is just minor increments.

#11 oakmere

oakmere

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,143 posts

Posted 23 January 2013 - 09:36 AM

If you don't want to change to a 2.5" exhaust I would remove the cat section and remove the pre-cat then cut out the main cat and weld in a 200 cell sports cat. I did this at an early stage of tuning and it made a noticeable difference. The cat should cost about £80 + welding. Manifolds cost much bigger money but it is worth keeping an eye out for second hand. Also look on z22se.co.uk for info and parts.

#12 JohnTurbo

JohnTurbo

    SuperScruff

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,635 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:wigan
  • Interests:Performance cars!

Posted 23 January 2013 - 10:48 AM

I have a 2.4 inlet and remapped ecu in parts sale section. Coupled with decent exhaust it dynod at 170ish bhp. Pretty cheap gain - im surprised it hasnt neen snapped up.

#13 fezzasus

fezzasus

    Whipping Boy

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,689 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oxford

Posted 23 January 2013 - 11:56 AM

A few people have swapped the NA backbox for the turbo version which is a straight swap, but should have a better flow rate. Not much you can do about the rest other than directly swapping them out. A common mod early on was removing the pre-cat. I've done the same and can't say i've noticed the different, but in theory it should help.

#14 tommobot

tommobot

    Need to get Out More

  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,008 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Stratford Upon Avon

Posted 23 January 2013 - 12:34 PM

Does the Turbo backbox fit straight on to the standard U-bend or is a custom piece required?

#15 oakmere

oakmere

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,143 posts

Posted 23 January 2013 - 12:56 PM

You need the turbo u bend then it bolts straight on.

#16 Winstar

Winstar

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,264 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chesterfield

Posted 23 January 2013 - 12:58 PM

Does the Turbo backbox fit straight on to the standard U-bend or is a custom piece required?


use the turbo one as it's bigger Diameter and has the flange in the same place

#17 Bargi

Bargi

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,483 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London

Posted 23 January 2013 - 01:35 PM

I'd like to keep the car na but would like to add a bit more sparkle at the top of the rev range.

I have a 2.4 inlet and remapped ecu in parts sale section. Coupled with decent exhaust it dynod at 170ish bhp. Pretty cheap gain - im surprised it hasnt neen snapped up.


^^^^This, if you want more get up and go in the top end the 2.4 manifold is what you want.
I had one without a remap and compared to standard cars I've driven it's much more exciting in the top end of the revs.
Grab this mapped ECU and you should get the extended rev range as well as you'll find yourself hitting it a lot more when you're on it with a 2.4 :)

Edited by Bargi, 23 January 2013 - 01:36 PM.


#18 Bargi

Bargi

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,483 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London

Posted 23 January 2013 - 01:40 PM

It's not uncommon to see 240-250bhp with standard manifold and Milltek exhaust with SC'd cars. Also I thought Nev or someone checked and the std flows to >300bhp or so, the Dave H airbox still uses the standard filter doesn't it? But I guess it's different with an NA compared to forced induction?

#19 Kev S

Kev S

    Super Duper Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 608 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Northamptonshire

Posted 23 January 2013 - 01:59 PM

Buy my full 2.5" exhaust system.

Its a 4-1 tullet manifold and piper downpipe/backbox.


I'm still interested in some / all of this system Chris if it's still for sale? Thought you sold it tbh

PM me!

#20 Captain Vimes

Captain Vimes

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,755 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South East
  • Interests:Motorbikes, VX220, Procrastination

Posted 23 January 2013 - 09:12 PM

Thanks for all your responses. Sounds like my ideal setup would be:- - 4-1 Manifold (Tullet looks good but piper is £200 cheaper...) - 2.5" downpipe with sports cat (these seem ridiculously expensive for what they are - I'm sure my local exhaust place could fabricate one for half the price) - 2.5" U-bend (B&Q seem to have a nice range of u-bends...) - VXT exhaust box / modified N/A (pipo style) Coupled with intake mods along the lines of: - K&N filter (already on car) - Straight intake wih Samco 90 degree bend - 2.4 inlet Hopefully this should free the top end up whilst maintaining a nice OEM sound. Any thoughts/experience on whether the equal length Tullet manifold is worth £200 more than the piper?

Edited by Captain Vimes, 23 January 2013 - 09:13 PM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users