Jump to content


Photo

Zenos E10


  • Please log in to reply
29 replies to this topic

#21 Winstar

Winstar

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,264 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chesterfield

Posted 10 January 2014 - 02:48 PM

I first thought that too, however the roll cage looks like it makes up for the lack of side protection (providing only the roll bar design has been changed since this)
 
Posted Image

I was more worried about the complete lack of lower body protection from a front or front-side on impact.

#22 fezzasus

fezzasus

    Whipping Boy

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,689 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oxford

Posted 10 January 2014 - 03:55 PM

Front on should be fine as the nose of the backbone should take a lot of it, I completely agree with front-side protection though. I assume they don't need to worry about crash testing given the numbers they are looking to produce?



#23 kipper

kipper

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,364 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Devon
  • Interests:Things that rotate.
    Smoking various types
    of fish.

Posted 11 January 2014 - 03:09 AM

 

Let me see, a 340R or one of these?

Hmmm. Me thinks I'd take one of these and the Duratec engine, or whatever they're currently called, and steer well clear of a K series.

Looking at the chassis design I know where I'd rather be if it all goes wrong, there's a reason that they stopped designing cars with backbone chassis. Having repairable chassis is not much point if you can't use it!

I guess that with the lotus DNA present in the designers, we have experienced a throwback to some of the early Lotus chassis ideas.

#24 RobNA

RobNA

    RobSC :)

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,856 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St Albans

Posted 11 January 2014 - 11:13 AM

Believe it when I see it (in proper production)

 

This



#25 jonnyboy

jonnyboy

    The hardtop guy

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,290 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Lightweight sportscars, Brunettes, Petrol & Beer.

Posted 11 January 2014 - 06:09 PM

Its in production you can order it!

 

Chassis any "worse" than an atom? If you look at viable New car alternatives to this car you are looking at Atom, KTM, Caterham, Westfield MEV(!?) 

 

I think its bang on the money.



#26 Thealastair34

Thealastair34

    Need to get Out More

  • PipPipPipPip
  • 988 posts
  • Location:Wakefield

Posted 11 January 2014 - 06:24 PM

looks good, hope it has better fit and finish than the "kit cars"

 

only major issue is i presume it has no roof, massive downfall even for a weekend toy



#27 Graeme Lambert

Graeme Lambert

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,543 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Steeple Claydon, Buckinghamshire

Posted 11 January 2014 - 08:12 PM

It might be 'in production' jon but how many customer cars have they delivered so far. AFAIK it's 'untested' as well - could drive like a bag of shite

#28 jonnyboy

jonnyboy

    The hardtop guy

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,290 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Lightweight sportscars, Brunettes, Petrol & Beer.

Posted 11 January 2014 - 08:22 PM

Highly unlikely given the pedigree of the owners. Always a bit of a risk with a new car but if teo ex Caterham guys cant do it nobody can!



#29 sworks

sworks

    Billy No Mates

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,566 posts
  • Location:Kent

Posted 12 January 2014 - 12:55 AM

According to zenos' twitter feed, the car is off for 6 months of testing after the show

#30 -Dab-of-Oppo-

-Dab-of-Oppo-

    Cuntpuffin

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,646 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Nr. Fordingbridge, Hampshire

Posted 26 January 2014 - 10:54 AM

There's quite an interesting 8 page spread on it in the latest issue of Evo mag. :)




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users