I was more worried about the complete lack of lower body protection from a front or front-side on impact.I first thought that too, however the roll cage looks like it makes up for the lack of side protection (providing only the roll bar design has been changed since this)

Zenos E10
#21
Posted 10 January 2014 - 02:48 PM
#22
Posted 10 January 2014 - 03:55 PM
Front on should be fine as the nose of the backbone should take a lot of it, I completely agree with front-side protection though. I assume they don't need to worry about crash testing given the numbers they are looking to produce?
#23
Posted 11 January 2014 - 03:09 AM
I guess that with the lotus DNA present in the designers, we have experienced a throwback to some of the early Lotus chassis ideas.Looking at the chassis design I know where I'd rather be if it all goes wrong, there's a reason that they stopped designing cars with backbone chassis. Having repairable chassis is not much point if you can't use it!Hmmm. Me thinks I'd take one of these and the Duratec engine, or whatever they're currently called, and steer well clear of a K series.Let me see, a 340R or one of these?
#24
Posted 11 January 2014 - 11:13 AM
Believe it when I see it (in proper production)
This
#25
Posted 11 January 2014 - 06:09 PM
Its in production you can order it!
Chassis any "worse" than an atom? If you look at viable New car alternatives to this car you are looking at Atom, KTM, Caterham, Westfield MEV(!?)
I think its bang on the money.
#26
Posted 11 January 2014 - 06:24 PM
looks good, hope it has better fit and finish than the "kit cars"
only major issue is i presume it has no roof, massive downfall even for a weekend toy
#27
Posted 11 January 2014 - 08:12 PM
#28
Posted 11 January 2014 - 08:22 PM
Highly unlikely given the pedigree of the owners. Always a bit of a risk with a new car but if teo ex Caterham guys cant do it nobody can!
#29
Posted 12 January 2014 - 12:55 AM
#30
Posted 26 January 2014 - 10:54 AM

2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users