

Performance Mods - Which Route ?
#1
Posted 18 May 2005 - 01:03 PM

#2
Posted 18 May 2005 - 05:37 PM
#3
Posted 18 May 2005 - 05:38 PM
#4
Posted 18 May 2005 - 06:19 PM
#5
Posted 19 May 2005 - 06:43 AM
#6
Posted 19 May 2005 - 06:51 AM
#7
Posted 19 May 2005 - 07:40 AM
Have a look at the thread [HERE]. I posted my experience from a full Miltek, Stage 2 remap and Viper done at AMD. Look for my posts around September on page 11 including the dynaplot.Any comments/advice/recommendations from those that have "been there and done it" would be great.
Performance wise I was not happy with results at least on paper. It was a lot of money for an additional 11 bhp. There is a flat spot around 4k. The sound from the induction can be loud and annoying although you can generally keep it in the quiet band for motorway cruising.
On the track I think the performance is probably better (no proof) and the flat spot isn't noticable. The noise can also be amazing.

On balance I don't regret the mods. It would be nice if AMD would increase the rev limit a bit. You'll need the Miltek for the Courteney Hitec Supercharger conversion!

Good luck with your decision. I'm sure others will have differing views on the success of their mods and how best to spend the money!

#8
Posted 19 May 2005 - 08:55 AM

#9
Posted 19 May 2005 - 09:06 AM

#10
Posted 19 May 2005 - 10:11 AM
I think the lighter flywheel does mean a lumpier tickover. I think rubber has had it done, possibly others. Worth a search.Unless the remap also changes the engine idle control loop parameters then it should be the same I would think.

Edit: Try this one [HERE]

Edited by VIX, 19 May 2005 - 10:16 AM.
#11
Posted 19 May 2005 - 10:12 AM

#12
Posted 19 May 2005 - 10:17 AM
#13
Posted 19 May 2005 - 11:03 AM
#14
Posted 19 May 2005 - 11:07 AM
My thoughts as wellYou don't need +10Bhp. Money is much better spent on suspension and brake mods IMHO.

#15
Posted 19 May 2005 - 11:39 AM

#16
Posted 19 May 2005 - 11:44 AM
I know the Piper 266° cams give a somewhat lumpy idle, even combined with the std, heavy, flywheel.
You will barely feel any difference just with a Milltek and a remap.
There other things u may want to do:
- A Quaife LSD £500 (+ install)
- Nitron shocks £1000
- Piper cams £200 (+ install)
- Courtenay 5,6 kg flywheel £250 (+ install)
- WeaponR manifold £350 (+ install)
..all of ém good alternatives
#17
Posted 19 May 2005 - 12:06 PM

#18
Posted 19 May 2005 - 12:45 PM
Jon at Couteney's exlained that their RR gave some pretty impressive figures at first but they tracked it down to tyre slip, hence on my LY they had a big barrel of water in the boot + Jon adding his weight to the rear end. I guess this wouldn't be such a problem in a lard arse turbot175bhp from a car with only exhaust/induction and remap is extremely unlikely. I think at one time AmD found their rolling road to be very optimistic, and have since started calibrating it much more often. This may be rubbish, but I seem to remember reading that here.
If that's the case, it could explain the inflated figure.

Have a look at the Courteney Remap Group Buy thread as quite a few of us posted before and after graphs and there were a few different mod combinations.
#19
Posted 19 May 2005 - 02:35 PM
#20
Posted 19 May 2005 - 03:18 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users