Jump to content


Photo

Alignment & Track


  • Please log in to reply
26 replies to this topic

#21 Ricky2772

Ricky2772

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,685 posts
  • Interests:For those who grasp for Hir beyond the horizon of usual consciousness, preparing for the time when something powerful will present Hir-Self This advise is given...

Posted 08 October 2003 - 12:16 PM

another view of a ££££££££££ repair bill... :drink:

Attached Files



#22 clipping_point

clipping_point

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,908 posts
  • Location:Linköping, Sweden

Posted 08 October 2003 - 12:48 PM

I have removed 3 per side in front. Should I remove them at rear as well? From Steve Crisp above: Note: - For TOE, a positive value indicates wheels pointing inwards (converging), whilst a negative value is the opposite. This means that the quoted 0,18 is inwards (positive) (I got it from the Speedster forum)

#23 Ricky2772

Ricky2772

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,685 posts
  • Interests:For those who grasp for Hir beyond the horizon of usual consciousness, preparing for the time when something powerful will present Hir-Self This advise is given...

Posted 08 October 2003 - 02:56 PM

I have removed 3 per side in front. Should I remove them at rear as well?

From Steve Crisp above:
Note: - For TOE, a positive value indicates wheels pointing inwards (converging), whilst a negative value is the opposite.

This means that the quoted 0,18 is inwards (positive) (I got it from the Speedster forum)

I got rid of all shims, front and rear, the abs sensors-shim included.....unbeatable handling at the track....

#24 clipping_point

clipping_point

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,908 posts
  • Location:Linköping, Sweden

Posted 08 October 2003 - 03:31 PM

Visited a tire shop today and they performed an adjustment of the toe-in, front and rear, because I had installed Eibachs on it. Strangely the camber was different left and right on both front and rear axle!!!! Camber front L/R: -0,7°/-1,3° Camber rear L/R: -2,1°/-2,5° Can the factory values differ that much??

#25 Steve Crisp

Steve Crisp

    Billy No Mates

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,810 posts
  • Location:Little Ann, Andover, Hants, UK
  • Interests:VX220's...

Posted 15 October 2003 - 12:06 PM

Bet ya that both the camber and castor angles are only set up "fairly close" during build. I can't see them assembling the car, measuring the geometry, and then stripping it all down to move adjusting washers and shims around! Oh, and then remeasure and strip it down again if necessary.. Nah, won't happen. I'm keen to get a reliable guage and do an exact job myself. I can't find any tyre place that will do casor and camber measuring. They all only do toe. Steve

#26 clipping_point

clipping_point

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,908 posts
  • Location:Linköping, Sweden

Posted 15 October 2003 - 12:15 PM

Thanks Steve, seems reasonable. In Sweden both tyre shops I´ve consulted has had computerized equipment with separate sensors applied on each wheel. Just the measurement costs a mere £10 and then the adjustment of toe on all 4 wheels cost me an extra £30. Therefore I think I will perform the camber adjustments myself and verify it with tyre shop measurements. The caster angle was 3.0 and should be 3,5 but I will not adjust this, seems too much work. :o

#27 clipping_point

clipping_point

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,908 posts
  • Location:Linköping, Sweden

Posted 16 October 2003 - 12:58 PM

..and the caster is reduced 0,3° because the front is lowered 30 mm with the Eibachs I realise now :unsure: . Looks smashing though :groupjump:




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users