94 replies to this topic

[i need nos]

come on peeps lets have the vital stats.... im in comparing mode lol

[Ozzig]

Normal VXT - 197.8 @ flywheel 164.6 @ wheels

[christurbo]

VX NA

DIY Airbox Mod + Pre Cat Removed.

Fly:- 144.0 BHP
Wheels:- 118.2 BHP


See >>>Here<<<

Edited by christurbo, 13 May 2006 - 05:25 PM.

[SteveM]

anyone got results for an n/a stage 2+ from today? ta very much

[speedster]

Last time I was on the RR: Modded NA 161bhp @ flywheel 140bhp @ wheels Modded more since then, planning another RR session when I get my head done!

[christurbo]

anyone got results for an n/a stage 2+ from today? ta very much

A couple ranging around 146-150+bhp at the fly.

[SteveM]

anyone got results for an n/a stage 2+ from today? ta very much  

A couple ranging around 146-150+bhp at the fly.

That seems pretty low, even considering JT's warning about not expecting too much. My RR figures at Regal's newly installed (last year) dyno was 158bhp with their remap. I've since had a TMS stage 2 map installed. My car is currently a stage 2+ but without a sports cat, which will soon be addressed

[christurbo]

Yep - a few faces! [BTW - the 2+ was with 200 cell miltek sports cat too] Thats why I was impressed with my figures in comparison. One VXT had 255 at Courtney and 225 at TMS.

Edited by christurbo, 13 May 2006 - 07:36 PM.

[SteveM]

VX NA

DIY Airbox Mod + Pre Cat Removed.

Fly:- 144.0 BHP
Wheels:- 118.2 BHP


See >>>Here<<<

does that include you?

[christurbo]

Include me what?

[SteveM]

sorry, I was wondering if you were about your RR result, but I see from your edit that you're not . I'm surprised that Courtenay show 30bhp more on that VXT, who do you believe

Edited by SteveM, 13 May 2006 - 07:40 PM.

[jules_s]

So what was the standard NA if all these modded ones seem so underpowered?

[christurbo]

sorry, I was wondering if you were about your RR result, but I see from your edit that you're not . I'm surprised that Courtenay show 30bhp more, who do you believe

I think that RR's vary completely.

After speaking to John he said he has tried everything to match BHP readings at other places - but cant!

My BHP wasnt far off the stage 2/+ would be interested in RR'ing it at another place.

[SteveM]

So what was the standard NA if all these modded ones seem so underpowered?

No-ones results were published, so it was difficult to know who had what stage of tune to their car unlees you were a nosey bar-steward and asked.

[Its Will]

So what was the standard NA if all these modded ones seem so underpowered

Allow me....

Bog standard NA, Optimax and no buckles

119.2 wheels
145.3 flywheel

(Although I think all my wheels are pretty fly)

[SteveM]

sorry, I was wondering if you were   about your RR result, but I see from your edit that you're not . I'm surprised that Courtenay show 30bhp more, who do you believe

I think that RR's vary completely.

After speaking to John he said he has tried everything to match BHP readings at other places - but cant!

My BHP wasnt far off the stage 2/+ would be interested in RR'ing it at another place.

End of the day, it's a headline figure. It's how the car drives and how you perceive it is what counts

Mind you, everyone still likes to quote how fast and furious their car is

[jules_s]

So what was the standard NA if all these modded ones seem so underpowered

Allow me....

Bog standard NA, Optimax and no buckles

119.2 wheels
145.3 flywheel

(Although I think all my wheels are pretty fly)

So,

1 bhp less than a 2+ then?

Edit: I'd be interested to see both the graphs though

Edited by jules_s, 13 May 2006 - 07:49 PM.

[SteveM]

So what was the standard NA if all these modded ones seem so underpowered

Allow me....

Bog standard NA, Optimax and no buckles

119.2 wheels
145.3 flywheel

(Although I think all my wheels are pretty fly)

That just shows that JT's dyno is a pretty good meaure then

[christurbo]

Strange I know!


Please note my ammendment to the thread I linked to in my first post on this thread! A HUGE difference!

Just realised the figure at the graph at the bottom shows BHP at the wheels!!!!

So that would be 142 bhp at the wheels 

   
   
   
   
   


That would be a big difference to my current figure - I might want to take it to John Wilcox to have a more accurate comparison using the same RR.


Sorry!

Please disregard this thread!

[speedster]

My last graph with full Milltek, Komo-tec Induction and Remap