Jump to content


Photo

Performance Figures For Supercharged Vs. Turbo


  • Please log in to reply
21 replies to this topic

#21 Jameshs

Jameshs

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,511 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Copthorne, Nr Gatwick
  • Interests:Cars and Rock Climbing

Posted 23 June 2009 - 10:08 AM

Cool.

:closedeyes:


Yeah, mine and Martins cars have identical power (mine is a stageII VXR with a few other extras under the hood :lol:).

There's a vid from Abbeville if you go straight to 2:58 you will see we drag race down the back straight, and there's simply nothing in it!

My accelleration gradient is steep but short, where Martins is less steep but long. Translates to much the same thing in real life. I do appreciate the extra torque you get with the turbo though (278lbs/ft).

Only thing that lets my car down is weight. She's a bit of a porker!



I think you should sell the speedlines to me then and get some nice exige wheels :P

#22 toreide

toreide

    Super Member

  • PipPip
  • 315 posts
  • Location:Norway

Posted 28 June 2009 - 07:27 PM

Posted Image

Numbers for the speedster was off a PerformanceBox. The best recorded 0 - 62 was 4.3s.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users