
Reduced Front End Lift
#1
Posted 24 November 2009 - 10:46 AM
#2
Posted 24 November 2009 - 10:47 AM

HTH

#3
Posted 24 November 2009 - 10:48 AM

http://www.youtube.c...feature=related
21 seconds in.
Edited by SteveA, 24 November 2009 - 10:50 AM.
#4
Posted 24 November 2009 - 10:53 AM
#5
Posted 24 November 2009 - 11:11 AM

#6
Posted 24 November 2009 - 11:17 AM
#7
Posted 24 November 2009 - 11:33 AM

#8
Posted 24 November 2009 - 11:35 AM
lift that may effect the front at higher speeds
I would get some evidence before adding so called improvements.
I have no spitters and haven't ever really felt a light front end even at 130-140. Although i only ever made it to that once on a french motorway.
the only reason i would fit splitters is to protect the front clam

Edited by JG, 24 November 2009 - 11:37 AM.
#9
Posted 24 November 2009 - 11:37 AM
#10
Posted 24 November 2009 - 11:45 AM
#11
Posted 24 November 2009 - 11:50 AM
If you look at the TMS race splitter you can see the front lip

Of course you could always mount it like the old Super Tourer BTCC cars where they weren't rigidly mounted in bump on the cars and could rise up over the kerbs when they grounded out

Also as VIX pointed out, you need to consider what happens around the whole car. Reducing front end lift would would most likely increase the lift at the rear of the car
#12
Posted 24 November 2009 - 11:55 AM
Mine was always light > 100 mph. Turbo splitters and spoiler possibly helped. Lowering the car with Nitrons helped probably more and the car was stable to 120 mph. The car is now a bit higher and some high speed lightness has returned. My belief is that it is the whole aero package which is important and not just one bit of it.I have no spitters and haven't ever really felt a light front end even at 130-140.

#13
Posted 24 November 2009 - 12:03 PM
My belief is that it is the whole aero package which is important and not just one bit of it.
Anyone one know how much its cost to hire the MIRA wind tunnel for a few hours???

Edited by rsg, 24 November 2009 - 12:04 PM.
#14
Posted 24 November 2009 - 12:14 PM
#15
Posted 24 November 2009 - 12:19 PM
shed loads of cash lol. as its not simply a few hours... its days/weeks of instrumentation etc blah blah
what instrumentation would you need?? If your just interested with set Clf and Clr figures then its just a case of driving the car in and off you go

#16
Posted 24 November 2009 - 12:26 PM
#17
Posted 24 November 2009 - 12:27 PM
Nah! You just need a few Milton Keynes roundabouts mate!Anyone one know how much its cost to hire the MIRA wind tunnel for a few hours???My belief is that it is the whole aero package which is important and not just one bit of it.

#18
Posted 24 November 2009 - 12:33 PM

#19
Posted 24 November 2009 - 12:48 PM
Better pay for a full 3D Scan of a VX then stick it in a CFD software
No probelm, if someone builds me a cad model
#20
Posted 24 November 2009 - 12:50 PM
Better pay for a full 3D Scan of a VX then stick it in a CFD software
No probelm, if someone builds me a cad model
I know someone with the scanning equipment
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users