
Reduced Front End Lift
#21
Posted 24 November 2009 - 01:12 PM
#22
Posted 24 November 2009 - 01:23 PM
#23
Posted 24 November 2009 - 02:15 PM
Better pay for a full 3D Scan of a VX then stick it in a CFD software

Unfortunately you will also need to model the apertures, air intakes and what is behind them, and underside. Just modelling the closed top of the body from a scan is not sufficient for accurate CFD modelling.
#24
Posted 24 November 2009 - 02:22 PM
Better pay for a full 3D Scan of a VX then stick it in a CFD software
![]()
Unfortunately you will also need to model the apertures, air intakes and what is behind them, and underside. Just modelling the closed top of the body from a scan is not sufficient for accurate CFD modelling.
not quite true, to get an exact figure for things like cd and lift then yes you would need an accurate representation of the 'underhood' however what you can do with a less detailed model is assess the merits of different aerodynamic features against one another.
#25
Posted 24 November 2009 - 02:29 PM
Better pay for a full 3D Scan of a VX then stick it in a CFD software
![]()
Unfortunately you will also need to model the apertures, air intakes and what is behind them, and underside. Just modelling the closed top of the body from a scan is not sufficient for accurate CFD modelling.
not quite true, to get an exact figure for things like cd and lift then yes you would need an accurate representation of the 'underhood' however what you can do with a less detailed model is assess the merits of different aerodynamic features against one another.
mixing drag and against frontal area
CdA , Lotus Elise 1999 = 6.35 sq ft (0.590 m2)
#26
Posted 24 November 2009 - 02:29 PM
#27
Posted 24 November 2009 - 02:35 PM
You would definately need an accurate front aperture and radiator model due to the significance of the flow going through there and up through the bonnet...
Probably not so important for the engine bay area as you say, although the relative air bleed from the engine cover and through the rear wheel arches may play a significant role in the rear lift...
as long as you where comparing against a baseline case and assessing the design changes then a representative shapes and flow paths would do, the loss though the front apature region is dominated by the flow characteristics of the radiator.
#28
Posted 24 November 2009 - 02:45 PM
You would definately need an accurate front aperture and radiator model due to the significance of the flow going through there and up through the bonnet...
Probably not so important for the engine bay area as you say, although the relative air bleed from the engine cover and through the rear wheel arches may play a significant role in the rear lift...
as long as you where comparing against a baseline case and assessing the design changes then a representative shapes and flow paths would do, the loss though the front apature region is dominated by the flow characteristics of the radiator.

like going to a crappy/inaccruate RR.... aslong as you baseline it there and do subsequent runs with X mods there then its the difference you are after that matters, and not the exact figures

#29
Posted 24 November 2009 - 02:57 PM
mixing drag and against frontal area
CdA , Lotus Elise 1999 = 6.35 sq ft (0.590 m2)
VX220 NA
Cd = 0.38, FA = 1.6 sq m, CdA = 0.61
VX220 Turbo / VXR
Cd = 0.41, FA = 1.6 sq m, CdA = 0.66
oh and MIRA wind tunnel works out around £500/hr

Edited by pjohn151, 24 November 2009 - 03:01 PM.
#30
Posted 24 November 2009 - 03:10 PM
mixing drag and against frontal area
CdA , Lotus Elise 1999 = 6.35 sq ft (0.590 m2)
VX220 NA
Cd = 0.38, FA = 1.6 sq m, CdA = 0.61
VX220 Turbo / VXR
Cd = 0.41, FA = 1.6 sq m, CdA = 0.66
oh and MIRA wind tunnel works out around £500/hr
cool i was looking for those figures to plug in to the data logger
#31
Posted 24 November 2009 - 05:06 PM
You would definately need an accurate front aperture and radiator model due to the significance of the flow going through there and up through the bonnet...
Probably not so important for the engine bay area as you say, although the relative air bleed from the engine cover and through the rear wheel arches may play a significant role in the rear lift...
But you can do a model from a crashbox with simple hand tools
not possible for the whole car
#32
Posted 25 November 2009 - 08:45 AM
Edited by vxr36, 25 November 2009 - 08:45 AM.
#33
Posted 25 November 2009 - 08:56 AM




#34
Posted 25 November 2009 - 12:40 PM
Edited by Mangham54, 25 November 2009 - 12:41 PM.
#36
Posted 26 November 2009 - 01:59 PM



#37
Posted 26 November 2009 - 02:14 PM

#38
Posted 26 November 2009 - 04:33 PM

#40
Posted 27 November 2009 - 04:21 PM
I'm working on a CAD model in Catia V5 at the moment but I'm not sure when it will be done.
If anyone else want to have a go at it I'll post the bluprint needed here, and a picture of a car I made a few years ago![]()
Regars/ Mattias
Do you have that blueprint in another "editable" CAD format??
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users