And you know which (supposably) dyno reads correct then
Track and Road in Rainham (essex).
And by luck the 2WD rollers at Jamsport read the same as Track and Road.
Velos used to have accurate rollers, but they closed down years ago.
Posted 08 September 2012 - 07:40 PM
And you know which (supposably) dyno reads correct then
Posted 08 September 2012 - 08:03 PM
Posted 08 September 2012 - 08:39 PM
I haven't disputed a charge cooler working (other than the extra pressure drop / loss) . I have disputed rolling roads. Rolling roads can vary by what 20% ? How is that consistent?
Looks like a good result Aimy.
But wait, its a rolling road dyno.... not a on road dyno. It must be right .......
This just proves charge cooling works, where are the mmg air intercooler dyno plots?
Steve
Posted 08 September 2012 - 08:42 PM
Posted 08 September 2012 - 08:49 PM
Exactly. To say that a RR is the be all and end all is wrong. Too many variables. Keep the same settings and rr will give you an idea of increase. But who's do you use for an 'ACTUAL' figure?technically with RR's you want to benchmark on it, then hope to feck they have the temperature and humidity corrections right, and use that same rollers at every mod delta. But then mostly ignore the actual numbers.
Posted 08 September 2012 - 08:54 PM
Posted 08 September 2012 - 09:01 PM
Posted 08 September 2012 - 09:03 PM
Based on what?As said, the three in my last (but one) post.
Posted 08 September 2012 - 09:10 PM
Looks like a good result Aimy.
But wait, its a rolling road dyno.... not a on road dyno. It must be right .......
This just proves charge cooling works, where are the mmg air intercooler dyno plots?
Steve
Posted 08 September 2012 - 09:17 PM
Posted 08 September 2012 - 09:24 PM
Posted 08 September 2012 - 09:27 PM
Based on what?
As said, the three in my last (but one) post.
Posted 09 September 2012 - 07:50 AM
That surprises me George. With a rr you do t replicate actual on road conditions. I would have half expected with a rr to see an increase in intake temps.
Posted 09 September 2012 - 08:04 AM
That surprises me George. With a rr you do t replicate actual on road conditions. I would have half expected with a rr to see an increase in intake temps.
I would of thought temPs would be higher on road because engine etc would be under more load
Posted 09 September 2012 - 08:09 AM
That surprises me George. With a rr you do t replicate actual on road conditions. I would have half expected with a rr to see an increase in intake temps.
I would of thought temPs would be higher on road because engine etc would be under more load
An RR can load the engine to the max in all conditions (thats what a power run is afterall), whereas on the road its feesable that you cant load the engine to the max based on car weight/gear ratios etc.
Posted 09 September 2012 - 08:15 AM
Posted 09 September 2012 - 08:23 AM
And just how does going round a corner dictate how much power an engine makes? (I'll be polite this time )
Posted 09 September 2012 - 09:14 AM
Posted 09 September 2012 - 03:59 PM
And you know which (supposably) dyno reads correct then
Track and Road in Rainham (essex).
And by luck the 2WD rollers at Jamsport read the same as Track and Road.
Velos used to have accurate rollers, but they closed down years ago.
Posted 09 September 2012 - 04:02 PM
Yeah Stage 4 but was a bit low on the figures. They never strapped it down and was ran in 5th.
I await for the lol transmission loss comments.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users