24 replies to this topic

[nonterraquous]

NA Vx vs S2K???? On straight performance terms????? Even the most blinkered of you would have to admit the S2K is the quicker car, unless you are talking around a track (especially a tight one). On the road, no contest - the Hinda has 100bhp more, is more aerodynamic, has closer ratios, and only weighs 300kg or so more....

NA vs S2000 at Crail, 5th September this year. S2000 fastest run was 14.377s. My fastest was 14.259s (I was still getting used to sub 7000rpm gear changes and I had to go away early, and I weigh 120Kgs ) Very close but I reckon I could have gone quicker.

Lovely car tho, thought about one (or an NSX - love my Hondas me) before finding the VX.

Scott.

[clipping_point]

The power to weight ratio seem pretty equal to me HP Weight ratio 147 850 5,782312925 240 1285 5,354166667 Also the torque is p*ss-poor in the honda related to its weight, so I doubt that it would eat the VX alive. Instead I´ve passed several of them on race tracks! Great fun indeed!

[Mutt & Jeff]

would an NA be as quick as the S2k??

Yes, though not by much if both driven flat out. On day to day running the VX is quicker due to greater low down tourqe.....S2K's always get caught with their pants down
Yes the S2K is a nicer place to be in the winter....which is why it makes such a good car for soft old men/girls &

NA Vx vs S2K???? On straight performance terms????? Even the most blinkered of you would have to admit the S2K is the quicker car, unless you are talking around a track (especially a tight one). On the road, no contest - the Hinda has 100bhp more, is more aerodynamic, has closer ratios, and only weighs 300kg or so more....

Nothing like a good laugh before bedtime!

[skogshuggarn]

I have had two S2000 and they are more comfterbl than a VX, but the VX is more fun to drive, you have much more feeling in a VX. I do miss VTEC and the enginesound