
Fuel Pressure Regulator, 2.2 N / A
#21
Posted 20 December 2004 - 04:46 PM
#22
Posted 20 December 2004 - 05:44 PM
interesting...seems quite high already...We have messured fuel pressure. It is 4 bar in a standard N/A!
question for the techies:
could this be the reason why Delta-Motor chose to install the extra 2 injectors at the intake, in spite of upping the pressure of the existing 4 ?

#23
Posted 20 December 2004 - 05:44 PM



#24
Posted 20 December 2004 - 05:48 PM


Edited by vocky, 20 December 2004 - 05:49 PM.
#25
Posted 20 December 2004 - 06:03 PM
so with my SC kit, (218hp) probably the additional ECU takes care of that then...As for two extra injectors - upgrading the fpr would be required to supply the fuel for them
my question was more like....why not just upping the pressure instead of adding the 2 injectors....

#26
Posted 20 December 2004 - 07:33 PM
The reason is that the standard ECU does not allow you to reduce the injection time below a standard level which would kill your lamda reading for low revs.so with my SC kit, (218hp) probably the additional ECU takes care of that then...As for two extra injectors - upgrading the fpr would be required to supply the fuel for them
my question was more like....why not just upping the pressure instead of adding the 2 injectors....
In the new HITEC conversion, we have changed the injectors to bigger injectors and have added a new ECU, which is able to REDUCE injection time compared to the standard ECU. On top we increase the pressure by 0.5 bar while SC is in operation. This allows for a 50 higher injection while maintining the lambda=1. And we do not need any additional injectors. More work... but better injection and fuel control.
#2177
(Alexander)
#27
Posted 22 December 2004 - 03:54 PM
#28
Posted 22 December 2004 - 05:48 PM

#29
Posted 24 December 2004 - 12:24 PM

#30
Posted 26 December 2004 - 06:07 PM

#31
Posted 26 December 2004 - 06:10 PM

Edited by vocky, 26 December 2004 - 06:27 PM.
#32
Posted 26 December 2004 - 06:31 PM
Attached Files
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users