Edited by RWinstanley, 22 September 2005 - 10:50 AM.

Tuning Advice For Vx220 Na
#21
Posted 22 September 2005 - 10:49 AM
#22
Posted 22 September 2005 - 03:29 PM
#23
Posted 22 September 2005 - 03:50 PM
From what I´ve heard the inlet valves are allright.One of the main problems with the NA engine is that as mensioned above it's not designed to be a high specific out put engine and the inlet valves are designed to give good low down torque by providing alot of 'tumble' at low engine speeds, at the expense of flow capability at high engine speeds.

They are even considered slightly too large for the inlet channels. So by increasing the inlet channel some 15-20 %, and fitting a larger inlet, the inlet valve flow capacity is used at its full.
It may even be counterproductive to fit bigger valves, as it may disturb the flow.

#24
Posted 22 September 2005 - 07:35 PM
Edited by RWinstanley, 22 September 2005 - 07:36 PM.
#25
Posted 23 September 2005 - 03:39 AM
We've found that. The stock valves are actually pretty good.It may even be counterproductive to fit bigger valves, as it may disturb the flow.
#26
Posted 23 September 2005 - 07:18 AM
#27
Posted 23 September 2005 - 02:43 PM

Attached Files
#28
Posted 24 September 2005 - 04:04 PM
#29
Posted 24 September 2005 - 04:16 PM
#30
Posted 24 September 2005 - 08:34 PM
http://www.auto123.c...spy?artid=22752
#31
Posted 24 September 2005 - 09:20 PM
Why not buying a complete Ecotec 2.0L Supercharged Production Engine for $3,665.00.
http://www.auto123.c...spy?artid=22752
Thats not the production engine, its the crate engine which is missing the ac pump, pully, belt, starter, alternator and engine cover. Oh and ECU!
I guess you might be able to swap some of those off the 2.2, but the pully and belt would need ordering separately.
Cheers, Paul
#32
Posted 25 September 2005 - 07:37 AM
It will need a stand-alone ECU and a special flywheel so the cost will be considerably larger than at the first glance...Why not buying a complete Ecotec 2.0L Supercharged Production Engine for $3,665.00.
http://www.auto123.c...spy?artid=22752

#33
Posted 25 September 2005 - 09:06 AM


Edited by vocky, 25 September 2005 - 09:09 AM.
#34
Posted 25 September 2005 - 10:43 AM


#35
Posted 25 September 2005 - 11:46 AM

#36
Posted 25 September 2005 - 12:32 PM
I HAVE to get a wide band lambda of my own, u lucky bastard!!


It's really a great tool,i have the dynojet wide band commander,it that works pretty well,you can ceck fueling with great precision is very impressive to watch the ECU working in closed loop maintaining an ideal 14.7 /1 A/F ratio during part trhottle!!


#37
Posted 25 September 2005 - 02:09 PM
Wehn we gas flow the head the whole topengine is sent over and the valve tolerances checked and re-ground if necessary.that's my point, a standard head with standard valves is good, but a gas flowed head and decent valves is so much better
#38
Posted 25 September 2005 - 03:15 PM
A
mildlyhighly tuned 2.2L engine should be pushing out 200bhp +
never a truer word said..

..it's a personal choice/driving style thing





#39
Posted 25 September 2005 - 08:17 PM
This one?I HAVE to get a wide band lambda of my own, u lucky bastard!!
![]()
![]()
It's really a great tool,i have the dynojet wide band commander,it that works pretty well,you can ceck fueling with great precision is very impressive to watch the ECU working in closed loop maintaining an ideal 14.7 /1 A/F ratio during part trhottle!!
![]()
![]()
Dynojet
Seems to be a bargain!

#40
Posted 26 September 2005 - 02:17 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users