Next Mod
#1
Posted 04 November 2003 - 06:57 PM
#2
Posted 04 November 2003 - 07:03 PM
so what next.
PS money is in relativly short supply!
A cheap way to improve power-to-weight ratio is to do a Ricky (and I don't mean wreck your car at the Nürburgring every year ).
Follow Colin Chapmans's credo: More power makes you faster in a straight line, less weight makes you faster everywhere.
Chuck out the bits that serve no useful purpose – what they are only you can say.
#3
Posted 05 November 2003 - 05:01 PM
#4
Posted 05 November 2003 - 05:14 PM
#5
Posted 05 November 2003 - 05:33 PM
#6
Posted 05 November 2003 - 08:06 PM
#7
Posted 05 November 2003 - 09:36 PM
#8
Posted 05 November 2003 - 09:48 PM
Saw something in Hombase the other day. It was a peice of guttering - the joint that takes water from the horizontal gutter down into the vertical pipe. I'm not suggesting anyone use guttering on their car but the shape looked the right size rectangle to fit behind the side vent and graduaally flowed from a rectangle into a circular pipe. Got me thinking about how much more efficient this would be at ramming cold air into the filter box than the pathetic pipe that sticks about 2 inches out of the box at the moment.Also that air intake pipe could do with replacing. I'm sure something better could be made. Again I really haven't looked into it yet but I will do soon.
How about a flexible metal tube from somewhere like b&q? Something that doesn't restrict the air going round that bend to the engine.
Anyone know anything about laying custom shapes in fibreglass? Steve Crisp, you seem to be our resident engineer...?
#9
Posted 05 November 2003 - 09:52 PM
#10
Posted 05 November 2003 - 10:06 PM
Attached Files
#11
Posted 05 November 2003 - 10:17 PM
Edited by BogBrush, 05 November 2003 - 10:23 PM.
#12
Posted 06 November 2003 - 07:38 PM
#13
Posted 06 November 2003 - 07:43 PM
So we have a differing opinion from Bengie and Paulb.I think you've got rid of the most restrictive part of the exhaust in killing the pre-cat off.
I'd go for a re-map, or at least talk to the guys at AMD/Regal/Wherever, and see if they'll re-remap for a smaller fee if you change your back box.
This was what i was unsure about. Is there any point in having a back box replacement now I've done the pre-cat. Surely it won't make much difference and getting the remap done now would be just as good?
Bog brush - considering the effort needed to remove the precat I think you'd be a glutton for punishment trying to clear out the full cat
Surely you could get a straight thru pipe. - maybe a bit of drainage pipe from B & Q would do the trick
#14
Posted 06 November 2003 - 09:25 PM
#15
Posted 06 November 2003 - 10:00 PM
#16
Posted 06 November 2003 - 10:02 PM
#17
Posted 06 November 2003 - 10:22 PM
#18
Posted 07 November 2003 - 11:39 AM
Did wonder about that. Sounds like time for a little testing with differing lengths then. Although of course the shorter the distance between the filter and the throttle body the further away the filter is from good air.Paul - be aware that the length of piping between the filter and the throttle body has an effect on the performance characeteristics. varying that length makes for more performance higher up or lower down the rev range and the supplied length of pipe for you filter will have been chosen accordingly. I don't claim to be an expert on this but I read a long article on it once on some Elise related site - will try to dig it out.
cheers
Jase
#19
Posted 07 November 2003 - 01:22 PM
JaseDid wonder about that. Sounds like time for a little testing with differing lengths then. Although of course the shorter the distance between the filter and the throttle body the further away the filter is from good air.
Paul - be aware that the length of piping between the filter and the throttle body has an effect on the performance characeteristics. varying that length makes for more performance higher up or lower down the rev range and the supplied length of pipe for you filter will have been chosen accordingly. I don't claim to be an expert on this but I read a long article on it once on some Elise related site - will try to dig it out.
cheers
Jase
i know what you mean but I used to have 2 cold feed pipes between the air intake and the K&N filter head but after the short pipe between the Filter and intake manifold split i replaced it with a 30cm lemgth of Samco piping to get the head further down by the air intakes.
There is no noticeable difference in performance
Paul
#20
Posted 07 November 2003 - 01:51 PM
I thought that might be the case to be honest. It's probably the sort of thing where you might see a slight different shape on a RR graph but being able to feel that when sat in the drivers seat is another matter...Jase
i know what you mean but I used to have 2 cold feed pipes between the air intake and the K&N filter head but after the short pipe between the Filter and intake manifold split i replaced it with a 30cm lemgth of Samco piping to get the head further down by the air intakes.
There is no noticeable difference in performance
Paul
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users