

Posted 27 September 2007 - 08:51 PM
Posted 27 September 2007 - 08:54 PM
Edited by james141, 27 September 2007 - 08:55 PM.
Posted 27 September 2007 - 08:57 PM
Their stance is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of re-maps. If the call centre operative continues to say no, its surely worth escalating this by going direct to someone in management authority. Always a good idea to start with the CEO.
superchips used to be a chip replacement, now they can do it on modern cars by flashing a map on. same thing, newer method.
Well this is what I told them, but they seemed to be in 'computer says no' mode, and as they seem to know nothing about cars, they say that a remap is not covered, but a 'chip' is (even though the guy couldn't explain to me what they meant by a chip!)![]()
They've essentially declined to cover me for next year, so what I'm saying overall is that those of us with remaps declared with them as a 'chip' may have trouble in the event of a claim if they're being tight.
I've asked them to consider it further, so you never know, they may get hold of someone who knows waht they're talking about! I'll update here with anything further they say!
Posted 27 September 2007 - 08:59 PM
Posted 27 September 2007 - 09:02 PM
Their stance is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of re-maps. If the call centre operative continues to say no, its surely worth escalating this by going direct to someone in management authority. Always a good idea to start with the CEO.
Edited by james141, 27 September 2007 - 09:03 PM.
Posted 27 September 2007 - 09:05 PM
Their stance is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of re-maps. If the call centre operative continues to say no, its surely worth escalating this by going direct to someone in management authority. Always a good idea to start with the CEO.
This is exactly it, during their training they are probably told if its not on this list it is definatly a no
This is probably done for simplicity and to avoid any missunderstanding and to take any dissisions away from them.
Posted 27 September 2007 - 09:05 PM
Iwas with elephant and when I bought the VXT (stage2) they said they wouldn't insure mods ina ny shape or form?!
Any way switched to a broker reccommended on here(can't remember the name?) and listed all mods in full = no problem.
Posted 27 September 2007 - 09:08 PM
It would be worth pointing out to the CEO that their approach is leading, or wil lead, to them losing 'good' insureds. People like us (whether we mod our cars or not) are enthusiasts. Enthusiasts tend to look after their cars. The thought of unnecessarily losing decent policyholders to more enlightened competitors might just motivate senior managers.
Their stance is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of re-maps. If the call centre operative continues to say no, its surely worth escalating this by going direct to someone in management authority. Always a good idea to start with the CEO.
This is exactly it, during their training they are probably told if its not on this list it is definatly a no
This is probably done for simplicity and to avoid any missunderstanding and to take any dissisions away from them.
Edited by Spindoctor, 27 September 2007 - 09:16 PM.
Posted 27 September 2007 - 09:12 PM
Posted 27 September 2007 - 09:14 PM
Ive got my re-map listed as IIRC a 'chip enhancement/replacement' with Elephant, and i wont be losing any sleep or contacting them.
I'd love to see the legal argument if they welshed on the basis of the difference between a performance enhancing replacement chip or a performance enhancing re written existing chip.
Posted 27 September 2007 - 09:38 PM
Edited by scubadaddy, 27 September 2007 - 09:40 PM.
Posted 28 September 2007 - 05:45 AM
Posted 28 September 2007 - 06:02 AM
Posted 28 September 2007 - 06:20 AM
Posted 28 September 2007 - 07:48 AM
would some loss adjuster
void your claim
if you were sporting the latest Toyo's or yoko's or what ever !
Posted 28 September 2007 - 08:08 AM
Posted 28 September 2007 - 08:22 AM
Posted 28 September 2007 - 08:22 AM
I was with Admiral (same as elephant) last year. Had my remap declared as an 'engine chip'. Not a problem when i came to claim for a substantial amount after an accident. Inspector came out a few days after if happened, had a 2 minute look around the car, and just said, yep, that's fine mate. The only reason for the visit seemed to be to inspect what needed replacing, wasn't even bothered about mods.
Posted 28 September 2007 - 10:07 AM
Posted 28 September 2007 - 01:50 PM
Am I right in saying that insurance companies, whilst happy to allow modifications (at a price), will not actually insure them. So if you get rear ended and your sparkly new Larini exhaust gets binned they won't pay out for the value of the modification....? Although I think Adrian Flux are the only people I know who actually insure the for the value of mods as well.... but they'll want you to have owned the car for a year or so.
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users