
Tms Stage 5
#21
Posted 25 January 2008 - 09:13 PM
#22
Posted 25 January 2008 - 09:16 PM
I've never locked or deleted a thread in my life, why would I start with this one, we have nothing to hide.
Andrew was made fully aware that this was the first road car we had done, he was made fully aware that this meant that he was part of the testing process and he was made fully aware that it would take time.
I thought you didnt test on customer's cars ?

#23
Posted 25 January 2008 - 09:18 PM
#24
Posted 25 January 2008 - 09:22 PM

Surely if you don't use customer's cars, then andrews would be the 2nd or 3rd car.
We could go into lengthy detail about all the parts used and how they were selected through rigorous testing on our own cars
....and this is the quote about stage 5 on the website which doens't suggest andrew's is the only car / first car.
Edited by LazyDonkey, 25 January 2008 - 09:23 PM.
#25
Guest_Bletch (Guest)
Posted 25 January 2008 - 09:26 PM
When Andrew first brought the problems to light I think John said Andrew's was the 4th carSorry to be pedantic but if you don't.....then how can andrew's be the first car?
![]()
Surely if you don't use customer's cars, then andrews would be the 2nd or 3rd car.
We could go into lengthy detail about all the parts used and how they were selected through rigorous testing on our own cars
....and this is the quote about stage 5 on the website which doens't suggest andrew's is the only car / first car.
#26
Posted 25 January 2008 - 09:27 PM
I look forward to my day in court.
That maybe so, but would prob make better sense, including business sense to keep your feelings to yourself and your lawyers.
Its one thing a forum user slagging a company off, as that is what forums are part of. However its another thing a company slagging an individual off, this to me losers credibility.
The couple of years of years ive been a member on this forum, ive never seen companies that are given reviews on this site, good or bad e.g. Horizon, Plans, Top Gear etc ever post their feelings to work done on customer cars or bad publicity...
This for me is where TMS have suffered, have been too public about their business and have since become unstuck on several occasions where things have gone wrong. Sometimes is best to know when to act as a business and not a regular forum member...
#27
Posted 25 January 2008 - 09:27 PM
#28
Posted 25 January 2008 - 09:30 PM
That maybe so, but would prob make better sense, including business sense to keep your feelings to yourself and your lawyers.
Its one thing a forum user slagging a company off, as that is what forums are part of. However its another thing a company slagging an individual off, this to me losers credibility.
The couple of years of years ive been a member on this forum, ive never seen companies that are given reviews on this site, good or bad e.g. Horizon, Plans, Top Gear etc ever post their feelings to work done on customer cars or bad publicity...
This for me is where TMS have suffered, have been too public about their business and have since become unstuck on several occasions where things have gone wrong. Sometimes is best to know when to act as a business and not a regular forum member...
Thats a fair point and I'd love to just let this be in the hands of the court, however people read forums and assume that what is written about is gospel when its not. Look at Ekona's response, he's been to TMS, says he's always been happy with the service and yet a post like this turns that opinion without grounds, I have no option but to defend myself.
#29
Posted 25 January 2008 - 09:35 PM
Define stage 5?
Engine internals (pistons, cams, rods) - done before, our race car, MikeF's car and an Astra G
Turbo, manifold, injectors - all done on our race car.
Andrew was fully aware his was the first road car for the turbo, manifold, injectors other than the race car in which it performed very well (the break downs were crank shaft sensors, unrelated to road cars). Indeed most of the delays were due to the conversion from race application to road car, again a point made very clear at all stages.
I guess the problem comes is that to many this sort of post will not sit well with the frequent "we won't release something until it's been tested" words spoken on here. Also with the "we don't test on our customer's cars, unlike our competitors" posts.
The website paints a picture of a well developed stage 5 package that has been extensively tested on your own ROAD cars, and is now suitable and available for purchase.
I'm assuming that, were this the case, Andrew would have had no issues.
Edited by LazyDonkey, 25 January 2008 - 09:36 PM.
#30
Posted 25 January 2008 - 09:41 PM
#31
Posted 25 January 2008 - 09:41 PM
#32
Posted 25 January 2008 - 09:45 PM
#33
Posted 25 January 2008 - 09:49 PM
Attached Files
#34
Posted 25 January 2008 - 09:49 PM
If you look at the VX220 pages you'll notice they've not been updated from some time for this reason.
Ah i remember my first day in marketing school - "your website is your window to the world - make sure it's shiny !"
If TMS were mine and i knew my stage 5 product was a tiny weeny bit under-developed i'd not advertise it.
Anything else would, in my opinion, be false advertising.
#35
Posted 25 January 2008 - 09:51 PM
#36
Guest_Bletch (Guest)
Posted 25 January 2008 - 09:52 PM
is it sweet or salty?Anyone?
#37
Posted 25 January 2008 - 09:53 PM
Anyone?
I'll have a large one and a diet Pepsi thanks.
We haven't had a good TMS bashing thread for ages, this is so exciting.

Sticky
#38
Posted 25 January 2008 - 09:59 PM
Edited by vxr36, 25 January 2008 - 09:59 PM.
#39
Posted 25 January 2008 - 09:59 PM
Salty!is it sweet or salty?Anyone?

How could anyone eat that sh*t.

#40
Posted 25 January 2008 - 10:01 PM
We haven't had a good TMS bashing thread for ages, this is so exciting.
And we aren't having one now. We are having a discussion. hth
If courtenay / regal / vauxhall / anyone came on a forum and said something that I thought was questionable I would ask exactly the sort of questions I'm asking here.
I can't speak for everyone on this thread but for me, all I care about is the truth and a return to those old fashioned values of honesty and decency. If John makes a stirling rousing defence and when reading it i think "good point, well made" then i will of course retract any harsh statement i've made.
HTH

EDIT : If i posted something to say the world was round and someone said "lazy thats sh*t it's flat. You're a c*nt" and then when i said "my new car is white" and the same person said "lazy you c*ck, it's black. and you're a c*nt" that would be "lazy bashing". Therefore TMS bashing would be disagreeing with every statement john makes regardless of the validity of the statement. As far as i can see there has been no tms bashing in this thread.
Edited by LazyDonkey, 25 January 2008 - 10:06 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users