Vxt Mods
#21
Posted 23 February 2004 - 11:09 PM
#22
Posted 24 February 2004 - 10:38 AM
#23
Posted 24 February 2004 - 10:41 AM
#24
Posted 24 February 2004 - 11:14 AM
#25
Posted 24 February 2004 - 11:19 AM
Thats what I mean. For the spring to control the the ride quality, it would have to be so hard, that it wouldn't move, thus completley removing the role the dampers play of absorbing shocks.save for the fact that there is a limit how hard you can go on springs before the damping has little overall affect.
If the spring is too hard then it simply won't move.
#26
Posted 24 February 2004 - 12:49 PM
#27
Posted 24 February 2004 - 01:12 PM
My front offside doesn't make a clicking noise any more when rotated to go softer, but I can still 'feel' the clicking points though. I put some WD40 above the adjustment ring last time I played with it to remove some grit that was preventing it from going full hard, so maybe it'll be clicking next time I try it.Does any get problems with theirs losing clicks? I once had to set the car up on guesswork due to not hearing the clicks on the rears and it seemed to suck up the bumps like a rolls. Have'nt been able to match this even on the lowest setting.
#28
Posted 24 February 2004 - 01:47 PM
Harder springs don not neccesarily mean harder ride asuming you soften off the damping to compensate.Thorney & Gedi
I agree that damper rates do have an effect on ride quality. My point is that when the spring rates are much harder, even with adjustable dampers on the optimum setting for ride quality, the ride will be less comfortable than if the car had those dampers but standard rate springs.
If this were not so, then will someone please tell me why harder rate springs weren't specified by Vauxhall in the first place?
As I have said before, I think the reason is because harder springs = worse ride. If I am wrong, then there must be some other reason why Vauxhall/Lotus thought harder springs were a bad idea. There must be a downside. What is it?
The reason Vauxhall/Lotus don't spec them as standard is two fold:
1. My previous reason about needing to cover widest segment of customers, some wanting soft and some wanting hard
2. Standard suspension is non adjustable and too soft a spring would be just as bad in the handling stakes.
My whole point on this is that the Nitrons (and any other adjustable suspension) DO allow a softer ride than standard, just because the rings are harder does not mean it HAS to be a harder ride.
Trust me, play around with the settings....you can make a difference.
#29
Posted 25 February 2004 - 03:09 PM
#30
Posted 25 February 2004 - 03:55 PM
#31
Posted 25 February 2004 - 04:00 PM
There is a theory that the standard rear springs on the VXT could be improved with more progressive bump stops - the soft spring compresses under acceleration to put weight over the rear wheels but excessive suspension travel sits on the bump stops and stiffens the ride.This is the logic behind dual spring upgrades...
Very similar to a dual spring rate solution.
#32
Posted 25 February 2004 - 04:37 PM
#33
Posted 25 February 2004 - 09:19 PM
#34
Posted 25 February 2004 - 09:54 PM
#35
Posted 25 February 2004 - 10:07 PM
#36
Posted 03 March 2004 - 07:43 AM
#37
Posted 04 March 2004 - 08:05 PM
#38
Posted 05 March 2004 - 02:56 AM
#39
Posted 05 March 2004 - 07:57 AM
#40
Posted 09 March 2004 - 11:55 PM
Thanks for coming back with the update.For what it's worth I would definetly recommend them.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users