
0-60 Times
#1
Posted 04 July 2009 - 07:33 AM
#2
Posted 04 July 2009 - 07:45 AM
#3
Posted 04 July 2009 - 07:46 AM


#4
Posted 04 July 2009 - 08:02 AM
#5
Posted 04 July 2009 - 08:04 AM
#6
Posted 04 July 2009 - 08:26 AM

#7
Posted 04 July 2009 - 08:30 AM
I believe someone called Stephan Klasen can do a fairly quick 0-60
when he is on 2 or 4 wheels?

#8
Posted 04 July 2009 - 08:38 AM

#10
Posted 04 July 2009 - 08:57 AM

#11
Posted 04 July 2009 - 09:24 AM
Why do people seem to snub 0-60 askers??
Because its so friggin hard to achieve the manufacturers stated times and completely meaningless in the real word.
I did some 0 - 60 times testing for a manufacturer a few years ago (so they could publish the figures)
2000 mile old car, with brand new tyres & clutch. Half an hour and 10 runs later tyres were fuked and the clutch was slipping like a slippery thing. The best figure we achieved was 4.7 seconds - ONCE. Low and behold this is what was published.
If you really want to massively improve your 0 - 60 time, bolt a set of slicks on the rear and go to santa pod. You'll probably better you time by half a second or so
30 - 70 is a much more realistic performance measure, but the guy down the pub doesnt understand this.
#12
Posted 04 July 2009 - 10:02 AM
Why do people seem to snub 0-60 askers??
Because its so friggin hard to achieve the manufacturers stated times and completely meaningless in the real word.
30 - 70 is a much more realistic performance measure, but the guy down the pub doesnt understand this.

#13
Posted 04 July 2009 - 11:09 AM
#14
Posted 04 July 2009 - 11:09 AM
that is the main reason nobody posts 0-60 times, the vx220 will eat it's expensive clutch all to easilymy quickest 0-60 time is the smell of a burnt clutch

#15
Posted 04 July 2009 - 02:53 PM
Nice answer actuallyWhy do people seem to snub 0-60 askers??
Because its so friggin hard to achieve the manufacturers stated times and completely meaningless in the real word.
I did some 0 - 60 times testing for a manufacturer a few years ago (so they could publish the figures)
2000 mile old car, with brand new tyres & clutch. Half an hour and 10 runs later tyres were fuked and the clutch was slipping like a slippery thing. The best figure we achieved was 4.7 seconds - ONCE. Low and behold this is what was published.
If you really want to massively improve your 0 - 60 time, bolt a set of slicks on the rear and go to santa pod. You'll probably better you time by half a second or so
30 - 70 is a much more realistic performance measure, but the guy down the pub doesnt understand this.

Jesus christ that's fast!an old time with CS3,
40-90 4.4s
#16
Posted 04 July 2009 - 03:19 PM
Really, my 2.2 will easily do thatJesus christ that's fast!an old time with CS3,
40-90 4.4s

#17
Posted 04 July 2009 - 03:20 PM

Edited by joe_589, 04 July 2009 - 03:20 PM.
#18
Posted 04 July 2009 - 03:28 PM
of course, silly melardy turbos

#19
Posted 04 July 2009 - 03:49 PM
You nancy boys with your NAs always looking for a reason to make yourself feel better about purchasing the 'low-spec' vxof course, silly melardy turbos


#20
Posted 04 July 2009 - 03:51 PM



Edited by joe_589, 04 July 2009 - 03:53 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users