Of Course not she will be in baby seat on passanger seatIsn't the baby gonna get a bit cold travelling along in that.....

Vx220, Wot Is It Like
#21
Posted 16 January 2011 - 08:12 PM
#22
Posted 16 January 2011 - 08:18 PM
nappies, feed, dummies, change of clothes will go in the changing bag ,and put be hind the seat'sVery aerodynamic
![]()
How do you get in the boot to store nappies, feed, dummies, change of clothes.....................................

and wot wont fit can go in boot ( the rack come's of dead easy )

Edited by tim king, 16 January 2011 - 08:18 PM.
#23
Posted 16 January 2011 - 08:18 PM
Of Course not she will be in baby seat on passanger seat
Isn't the baby gonna get a bit cold travelling along in that.....
So your Mrs is going on the boot rack?

#24
Posted 16 January 2011 - 08:21 PM
Of Course not she will be in baby seat on passanger seat
Isn't the baby gonna get a bit cold travelling along in that.....
I was kidding...

#25
Posted 16 January 2011 - 08:32 PM
the pram will unclasp and turn to face towards and away from parent, is pos to turn round and still have pram wheel locked on the rack ps baby is a girlTurn the pram buggy thing around 180 degrees, put a little toy steering wheel thing in the front so he can pretend he's driving and you're good to go.
#26
Posted 16 January 2011 - 09:32 PM
#27
Posted 16 January 2011 - 09:38 PM


#28
Posted 16 January 2011 - 10:42 PM
Doesn't cover the holes in the buttresses though.Love it! When you don't need the luggage rack anymore to put the pram on a nice tubby spoiler will cover the holes

#29
Posted 17 January 2011 - 04:19 AM

Edited by Tail-end Charlie, 17 January 2011 - 04:26 AM.
#30
Posted 17 January 2011 - 08:35 AM
The VX and babies just don't work for long IME. Baby can only go in a rear facing baby seat until they are about 10 months and that is the only type of seat that will fit in the VX.
WRONG
You can have the rear facing seat in there just fine. And you can EASILY/SAFELY fit a Maxi cosi Tobi and Priori in there for forward facing. The only issue is once they grow out of the stage 2 seat you cant have them in the car, so you might make 4 years tops. The reason you cant have them in a stage 3/4 seat is 99% of them are NOT crotch strapped meaning the child will submarine in an accident

For the record when we went car seat shopping the lady at the shop we goto (an independent) said that all the seats we tried were the best fit in any car shes ever seen.
My only issue is its fcuking noisy and come winter the heater will NEVER be good enough. Summers were fun though

Look at the children section of the seloc wiki.
Depending on how he answers these questions he could make my list of ultimate über mongs.
Hes actually on my ignore list

Edited by slindborg, 17 January 2011 - 08:35 AM.
#31
Posted 17 January 2011 - 08:46 AM
Where did you get the luggage rack from?
^^^^that
#32
Posted 17 January 2011 - 09:36 AM
Where did you get the luggage rack from?
^^^^that
It was available direct from the Vauxhall accessory range for the VX. But quite why anyone would want to put the necessary holes to secure the four feet in their rear clam, amazes me. Somebody on here at some point said they stopped selling them as they caused some cracks but think it's more likely they were abandoned when the tubby came out.
Edit: Actually, that looks different to the genuine version.
Edited by techieboy, 17 January 2011 - 10:00 AM.
#33
Posted 17 January 2011 - 10:13 AM
Didn't think of those holesDoesn't cover the holes in the buttresses though.

Are you sure he's messing about lads????? He sounds a little bit more serious than you'd hope? Tim?
I don't think Tim is messing about! He seems to have found a good solution! Good on him, kids and sports cars

#34
Posted 17 January 2011 - 10:43 AM
Where did you get the luggage rack from?
^^^^that
It was available direct from the Vauxhall accessory range for the VX. But quite why anyone would want to put the necessary holes to secure the four feet in their rear clam, amazes me. Somebody on here at some point said they stopped selling them as they caused some cracks but think it's more likely they were abandoned when the tubby came out.
Edit: Actually, that looks different to the genuine version.

I wouldn't want to stick holes in my clam. Is it an option to look at getting a cheap shed Tim?
And looking at the picture of the pram on the car, I suspect you may be gaining the attention of the local constabulary on a regular basis.
#35
Posted 17 January 2011 - 12:24 PM
Are you sure he's messing about lads????? He sounds a little bit more serious than you'd hope? Tim?
I don't think Tim is messing about! He seems to have found a good solution! Good on him, kids and sports cars
GiGo what the hell? This is the most dangerous mod I've ever seen. I would rather take my chances on stage 4 in the wet than this!
For starters the rear view is completely blocked and at any kind of speed the drag on that buggy is going to rip those retaining bolts right through the fibreglass! But these things pale in comparison to the fact that you've got a cloth item sitting on top of the engine vents so your view will mainly be restricted by the fire

If that isn't enough, it looks ridiculous!

#36
Posted 17 January 2011 - 01:31 PM
GiGo what the hell? This is the most dangerous mod I've ever seen. I would rather take my chances on stage 4 in the wet than this!
For starters the rear view is completely blocked and at any kind of speed the drag on that buggy is going to rip those retaining bolts right through the fibreglass! But these things pale in comparison to the fact that you've got a cloth item sitting on top of the engine vents so your view will mainly be restricted by the fire![]()
If that isn't enough, it looks ridiculous!
Will be honest didn't think about the points you have raised but....
1) Rear view is crap anyway, you don't really need to see right behind you, wing mirros do the trick

2) If you re-inforce the clam aound the areas you might be good up to 30/40mph?

3) Um.... tough one, but.... if you remove the coth/buggy/wear baby sits bit and put it in the boot, then risk of fire is greatly reduced.
#37
Posted 17 January 2011 - 01:33 PM
If that isn't enough, it looks ridiculous!
Will be honest didn't think about the points you have raised but....
1) Rear view is crap anyway, you don't really need to see right behind you, wing mirros do the trick![]()
2) If you re-inforce the clam aound the areas you might be good up to 30/40mph?![]()
3) Um.... tough one, but.... if you remove the coth/buggy/wear baby sits bit and put it in the boot, then risk of fire is greatly reduced.
No getting away from the "looks ridiculous" then?

#38
Posted 17 January 2011 - 01:51 PM
No getting away from the "looks ridiculous" then?
No.
#39
Posted 17 January 2011 - 04:11 PM
Edited by simsy, 17 January 2011 - 04:12 PM.
#40
Posted 17 January 2011 - 05:09 PM
As suggested on here, duct tape around the seat back and forhead, allowing you to drive with two hands is the only truely safe way.... But the looks you get from other motorists takes the fun out of it..
1 picture of that online, and you would probably get more attention then you ever bargened for.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users