
Vx Dealership Crashed My Vx220
#81
Posted 02 August 2007 - 05:34 PM
#82
Posted 02 August 2007 - 06:27 PM
#83
Posted 02 August 2007 - 08:04 PM
#84
Posted 02 August 2007 - 08:26 PM
Edited by n1k_ns, 02 August 2007 - 08:28 PM.
#85
Posted 02 August 2007 - 09:04 PM
#86
Posted 03 August 2007 - 08:25 AM
I'd really wanted to avoid going public with this for so many reasons. However, I feel that stu-vx200 should be aware of my recent experience of having accident repairs done by TMS.
Well why didn't you just PM him then? Surely if you thought Stu should know about them, but didn't want to make it public, that would be the most effective way?

Also, Chazuwe's comments are totally superfluous - you say you'll never take your car to TMS, which of course is your choice and I wouldn't look to change it, but your basis for this appears to be only what you have been told by others. This results in a thread with what appears to contain 2 bad experiences of TMS, when in fact it is only based on one.
If a new owner was to come onto the site looking for where to take their car for servicing etc., this sort of posting will provide an unnecessarily negative image of TMS. Where someone has personally received poor service they are of course justified in posting about this experience, and others can then form their own view (although I would question why you need to post it publicly, surely just a PM to people asking a question will suffice - but maybe that's just me that thinks that?). However, to form that view based on others comments, and then post up your opinions on a company citing their reasons to justify it is IMO totally unreasonable and defamatory.
I'm not looking to create further arguments here, and don't have any problem with people posting about their experiences, I just don't agree with people posting 'second hand' views, which with a quick read can appear to come from first hand experience. It's just that this sort of thing seems to go on too much, and is simply not fair on TMS or other companies that are reviewed in this way on the site

#87
Posted 03 August 2007 - 08:44 AM
1) You only promised something when you are 100% sure you can deliver it
Agreed, however each time I gave Steve (or anyone for that matter) a time frame it is impossible for me to say with 100% that it is a timeframe that can be met. To give you an example, we look at a bit of work to be done that needs x parts, the only way we can find out if x more parts are needed is by stripping something down and for that we need approval, we get approval strip those parts and another unrelated issue crops up that we can't see until these other parts are off - you tel me, how to I predict with 100% what can happen?
2) If you promise to call someone back then call them back
Agreed, however it did appear that with a previous employye some messages weren't getting through. We now have a new system where are all calls are time stamped so we've sorted that. Fair point though.
3) If needs be be less optimisic with timescales to manage expectations
See above, I try to be as accurate as I can, but VX220's are notorious on parts supply and also the fact that sometimes the whole car comes apart in roder to even find things.
See above.4) When there are problems explain to the customer openly and give them realistic timeframes from there
Fair comment.5) Take on less work, that then means if you have sort out issues with work you have capacity to do so
Also fair comment. Racing for us this year has been a tremendous mistake, a decision I regret fully and agree with your comment.6) Perhaps work on development and race cars should only be done when the business is running at 100% i.e. full staff load
Agreed, and already done.7) Focus more on less
8) You treat it like a business, it is not a hobby anymore. You refer to some sort of favours being done for steve. When you are being paid £8.5K from an insurance company that is not a favour that is a business transaction. Treat it like one.
It is a business but regardless of this I still try to go the extra mile. With Steves car he specifically asked for the car (when it wasn't finished) in roder to 'shake it down' for the final parts came in an idea I readily agreed with. However when he returned the car with the list of complaints (quite agressively put) they were just the lsit of outstanding issues we knew that were outstanding. The actual bill came to over £9k, I had to absorb the extra costs. Steve specifically said "I don't want it written off" I went to phenominal measures to ensure this didn't happen still making sure the car was in unaffected working order and my result is to get slagged off. As I said, no more favours, no more freebies, no mroe droppng cars off at peoples houses at 8pm at night, no more 'shake down' runs if the car takes longer to fix that we hope then so be it.
You mention Steves 'heartache' this has also massively affected me and all of our insurance work, never again will I let any personal friendship get in the way of the right way of doing something and never again will I bend the rules to help someone to have it thrown in my face just because the times extend through no fault of my own.
#88
Posted 03 August 2007 - 08:46 AM
#89
Posted 03 August 2007 - 08:50 AM
How many times has a thread gone in this direction? Can't we just leave the bloke to get on with making a living?
Like a bunch of old women.
IT'S ONLY A CAR!
#90
Posted 03 August 2007 - 09:26 AM
[quote name='VIX' post='621781' date='Aug 2 2007, 17:45 ']
I'd really wanted to avoid going public with this for so many reasons. However, I feel that stu-vx200 should be aware of my recent experience of having accident repairs done by TMS.
[/quote]
Well why didn't you just PM him then? Surely if you thought Stu should know about them, but didn't want to make it public, that would be the most effective way?

Why should he just PM him? .. we're all quick enough to post up bad services by other dealers!!
[quote]Also, Chazuwe's comments are totally superfluous - you say you'll never take your car to TMS, which of course is your choice and I wouldn't look to change it, but your basis for this appears to be only what you have been told by others. This results in a thread with what appears to contain 2 bad experiences of TMS, when in fact it is only based on one.
If a new owner was to come onto the site looking for where to take their car for servicing etc., this sort of posting will provide an unnecessarily negative image of TMS. Where someone has personally received poor service they are of course justified in posting about this experience, and others can then form their own view (although I would question why you need to post it publicly, surely just a PM to people asking a question will suffice - but maybe that's just me that thinks that?). However, to form that view based on others comments, and then post up your opinions on a company citing their reasons to justify it is IMO totally unreasonable and defamatory.[/quote]
You have completely contradicted yourself there, first you say Chaz is being 'superfluous' for taking his own view/choice on VIX's experience.. then you go on to say ''Where someone has personally received poor service they are of course justified in posting about this experience, and others can then form their own view''

I also know that Steve is very passionate about his car and was in two minds on where to take it for repair..

I can totally understand what Charlie is saying too.. there are no favours in business, especially if your being paid to provide a certian standard of service to start with - John should know this, over bloody years of self employment myself i've learnt that 'work favours' only start heart ache and conflict.. you do these favours off your own back - there is no reward system for them..
I along with many other can also see that JT takes too much on, and sometimes over fills a plate.. thats what happens when you have a big heart and try to help everyone - sadly when doing this.. people will have promises broken and toes will stepped on.. John can't be 100% spot on all the time - it's not human.
[quote]I'm not looking to create further arguments here, and don't have any problem with people posting about their experiences, I just don't agree with people posting 'second hand' views, which with a quick read can appear to come from first hand experience. It's just that this sort of thing seems to go on too much, and is simply not fair on TMS or other companies that are reviewed in this way on the site [/quote]
At the end of the day i don't think anyone wants to argue over other peoples problems, but as far as im aware - it's always been said and still is - that this is an open forum [even though it's sponsored/created by JT ] so people can post what ever they want [within the forum rules] there's no need to sneak around sending PMs.. which can come across to me as vindictive and back stabing..
I only wish people had been open and honest about the bad service you get at my local dealer, i've had nothing but grief with them

Lets it be said i say.. both parties have the right to speak thier minds.
Let the punters decide on who's right and wrong.
Edited by R1CHY, 03 August 2007 - 09:33 AM.
#91
Posted 03 August 2007 - 09:31 AM


#92
Posted 03 August 2007 - 09:37 AM
#93
Posted 03 August 2007 - 09:40 AM
Rich, that was officially your most boring contribution to this forum, EVER!
![]()
Worse than that, you can't even spell quiet.


Unusual for you to be posting mid-morning - You on school holiday


#94
Posted 03 August 2007 - 09:51 AM
Unusual for you to be posting mid-morning - You on school holiday
![]()
boy!!
Off sick, Glasgow was starting to destroy my morale.


I'm guessing that you're not doing the whip??


TangoAlpha: Mind the language please
Dan: Ok.
Edited by djegiant, 03 August 2007 - 10:12 AM.
#95
Posted 03 August 2007 - 10:11 AM




Edited by R1CHY, 03 August 2007 - 10:12 AM.
#96
Posted 03 August 2007 - 10:45 AM
You have completely contradicted yourself there, first you say Chaz is being 'superfluous' for taking his own view/choice on VIX's experience.. then you go on to say ''Where someone has personally received poor service they are of course justified in posting about this experience, and others can then form their own view''![]()
Overall, I can see and understand your viewpoint - even if I don't agree with it, but that's the point of an open forum

However, I did not contradict myself. I said people can form their own opinion based on what others have said about their experience. But I then said that they shouldn't then go around posting those opinions based on others' experience as they do not add any further facts / experience to the debate, and only serve to further damage reputations (IMO unfairly), and are hence superfluous.
And then we get third parties chip in, who've heard Steves side of the story and weigh in with second hand, partisan information as if it were gospel truth - thats just not fair.
That's really the whole point of my posts

#97
Posted 03 August 2007 - 11:43 AM
#98
Posted 03 August 2007 - 12:16 PM
#99
Posted 03 August 2007 - 12:43 PM
#100
Posted 03 August 2007 - 02:35 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users