well done, I think you deserved that after all the hassle you had306.2 bhp @ 7000rpm
253.7 ftlbs @ 4500rpm
Guess The Bhp
#61
Posted 11 April 2011 - 05:01 PM
#62
Posted 11 April 2011 - 05:04 PM
fcuk me that's a great result306.2 bhp @ 7000rpm
253.7 ftlbs @ 4500rpm
just needs leaning out between 2.5k and 3.5k and thats the mapping completed.
#63
Posted 11 April 2011 - 05:08 PM
#64
Posted 11 April 2011 - 06:16 PM
#65
Posted 11 April 2011 - 07:27 PM
#66
Posted 11 April 2011 - 09:05 PM
Edited by Tail slide, 11 April 2011 - 09:06 PM.
#67
Posted 11 April 2011 - 09:07 PM
#68
Posted 12 April 2011 - 05:12 PM
#69
Posted 12 April 2011 - 05:21 PM
#70
Posted 12 April 2011 - 06:01 PM
#71
Posted 12 April 2011 - 07:49 PM
#72
Posted 13 April 2011 - 09:48 AM
#73
Posted 13 April 2011 - 12:05 PM
#74
Posted 13 April 2011 - 12:23 PM
#75
Posted 13 April 2011 - 12:42 PM
yea, its the uprated one like cliffe sells, well its identical i just got it from courtenays. pita to fit aswell lol
the curve starts to drop off at about 7000 but with a 3" exhaust the line should just carry on up to 7200rpm (rev limit) so maybe an extra 5bhp for the 3" system then the s/c needs changing to get anymore.
I'm not so sure the thing with the VX exhaust is the main loss is the bends, if going to a 3" means you need to change to tighter bends (1D instead of 1.5D) then you could end up with an exhaust that has just as much pressure drop.
I've said it before but the main probelm is the inlet manifold as if you look a the test data in this artical clicky, in particular the last two plots that show pre and post CC pressure, you can see that it massivly diverges to the point were the SC si still increasing pressure pre CC but it isn't being seen post CC. And that is with a 2L engine so 10% lower volume flow rate.
#76
Posted 13 April 2011 - 01:53 PM
#77
Posted 13 April 2011 - 05:02 PM
I'm not so sure the thing with the VX exhaust is the main loss is the bends, if going to a 3" means you need to change to tighter bends (1D instead of 1.5D) then you could end up with an exhaust that has just as much pressure drop.
I've said it before but the main probelm is the inlet manifold as if you look a the test data in this artical clicky, in particular the last two plots that show pre and post CC pressure, you can see that it massivly diverges to the point were the SC si still increasing pressure pre CC but it isn't being seen post CC. And that is with a 2L engine so 10% lower volume flow rate.
Was my idea too; use a 2,5" muffler with bigger (2.75-3"), larger radiused bends. (Maybe change to a side exit and loose 2 90* bends)
To those test data curves: not sure on the influence of temperature on the divergion. Post Laminova air is cooled so the pressure decreases... But interesting to see that with almost similar boost pressures at the motor (~21psi@7000), that TVS has a higher power and I can only explain that due to lower charge temps.
On the other hand a TVS is more efficient than the MP90, so if charge heat was a major factor here, those MP90 pressure lines should diverge a lot more than the TVS. And its both ~2psi@7000 so...
Back to Chris.
Edited by Exmantaa, 13 April 2011 - 05:08 PM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users