well done, I think you deserved that after all the hassle you had306.2 bhp @ 7000rpm
253.7 ftlbs @ 4500rpm

Posted 11 April 2011 - 05:01 PM
well done, I think you deserved that after all the hassle you had306.2 bhp @ 7000rpm
253.7 ftlbs @ 4500rpm
Posted 11 April 2011 - 05:04 PM
fcuk me that's a great result306.2 bhp @ 7000rpm
253.7 ftlbs @ 4500rpm
just needs leaning out between 2.5k and 3.5k and thats the mapping completed.
Posted 11 April 2011 - 05:08 PM
Posted 11 April 2011 - 06:16 PM
Posted 11 April 2011 - 07:27 PM
Posted 11 April 2011 - 09:05 PM
Edited by Tail slide, 11 April 2011 - 09:06 PM.
Posted 11 April 2011 - 09:07 PM
Posted 12 April 2011 - 05:12 PM
Posted 12 April 2011 - 05:21 PM
Posted 12 April 2011 - 06:01 PM
Posted 12 April 2011 - 07:49 PM
Posted 13 April 2011 - 09:48 AM
Posted 13 April 2011 - 12:05 PM
Posted 13 April 2011 - 12:23 PM
Posted 13 April 2011 - 12:42 PM
yea, its the uprated one like cliffe sells, well its identical i just got it from courtenays. pita to fit aswell lol
the curve starts to drop off at about 7000 but with a 3" exhaust the line should just carry on up to 7200rpm (rev limit) so maybe an extra 5bhp for the 3" system then the s/c needs changing to get anymore.
Posted 13 April 2011 - 01:53 PM
Posted 13 April 2011 - 05:02 PM
I'm not so sure the thing with the VX exhaust is the main loss is the bends, if going to a 3" means you need to change to tighter bends (1D instead of 1.5D) then you could end up with an exhaust that has just as much pressure drop.
I've said it before but the main probelm is the inlet manifold as if you look a the test data in this artical clicky, in particular the last two plots that show pre and post CC pressure, you can see that it massivly diverges to the point were the SC si still increasing pressure pre CC but it isn't being seen post CC. And that is with a 2L engine so 10% lower volume flow rate.
Edited by Exmantaa, 13 April 2011 - 05:08 PM.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users