










Posted 02 February 2015 - 09:55 AM
Posted 02 February 2015 - 10:16 AM
Posted 02 February 2015 - 10:20 AM
Posted 02 February 2015 - 10:29 AM
Posted 02 February 2015 - 11:56 AM
Yep it was a2.2 and now lives in the sunny Cayman Islands 😀I think Sean aka Taz had a 2.2 turbo which was exported some where from memory
Posted 02 February 2015 - 12:04 PM
Presume you are using your own log-style manifold for space issues, to avoid cutting the boot (as would be required with the standard Saab stuff)?
Looking forward to your results!
Posted 02 February 2015 - 12:43 PM
Posted 02 February 2015 - 01:00 PM
The saab intake is possible but I dont know how this one flows. It's better then plastic 2.4 boostwise, that's for sure.
Looking to fabricate something like this:
Hahn makes an aftermarket one but doesn't seem to fit really well in a VX.
@Rosssco: Yes, I would like to keep the boot. Once the log-mani is made to work, maybe I use it as reference to make a tubemanifold aswell.
Posted 02 February 2015 - 02:19 PM
Given you are planning on running fairly low boost and flow levels, you might as well stick with the standard 2.2 composite manifold and TB..?
If anything its probably slightly lighter and much less likely to heat soak in comparison to one of the alloy manifolds. Minor point being you can retain the standard alternator, which has to be changed to a 100A if using the 2.4 version..
Posted 02 February 2015 - 02:40 PM
Car looks very clean.
Quite rare to see them like that.
Posted 02 February 2015 - 03:08 PM
Given you are planning on running fairly low boost and flow levels, you might as well stick with the standard 2.2 composite manifold and TB..?
If anything its probably slightly lighter and much less likely to heat soak in comparison to one of the alloy manifolds. Minor point being you can retain the standard alternator, which has to be changed to a 100A if using the 2.4 version..
Exactly. There are some pro's and con's to the intake manifold but no one can tell for sure.
I was thinking of a short runner manifold to raise the high end of the powerband. The T25 on a 2.2 will give plenty of low end and midrange power. The saab one has 5" shorter runners then the 2.4 but I dont know about flow.
Posted 02 February 2015 - 05:08 PM
The US guys picked up around 50cfm airflow when they switched from an LSJ intake to the Saab manifold for their LSJ turbo swaps. And we're talking around 350-400WHP here. => Use the Saab mani with PCV valve and you will outpower your conrods.
Posted 06 February 2015 - 11:40 AM
Did the OP ever resolve this issue?
Posted 06 February 2015 - 01:48 PM
"Ever"? This thread is a few days old lol.
But the issue with intake manifolds you mean? Exmanta is gonna send me his saab manifold, so I have a 2.2, a 2.4 and a Saab manfold next to eachother for comparison. Maybe I'll even look around for a flowbench or so if I'm in the mood. Solve this whole intake manifold debate.
So far I like the idea of metal intake and no alternator issues.
Found an old nissanthread where some guys modelled some manifolds in a hydraulich flow programm thing stuff computer thing.
The problem they found with the box-like aftermarket intake (like the one in the pic a few posts back) is that the first runner/cilinder after the TB has less flow then the other three. The intake with a tappered body has better flow and even spreading:
Posted 07 February 2015 - 03:47 PM
Twin-plenum designs tend to fix that:
Feed from the side blows into the main chamber along a slot in the top so the air distribution is as even as possible.
Internally they are connected like this:
AFAIK originally pioneered by Audi for their rally quattros and it worked well.
Bye, Arno.
Posted 07 February 2015 - 05:34 PM
Posted 07 February 2015 - 08:05 PM
Posted 13 February 2015 - 09:46 PM
Finished the log-manifold today:
Will make a mall tomorow for a future tubular manifold. Log wil do the trick on a T25 for now.
Got about 20mm space between driveshaft and turbo. Should be enough with a heatshield.
Off now making braided lines and AN fittings...
Posted 14 February 2015 - 02:34 PM
Some more close-ups:
Posted 14 February 2015 - 03:36 PM
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users