Jump to content


Photo

Quantum Zeros And The Vx220 Turbo


  • Please log in to reply
68 replies to this topic

#1 Horace

Horace

    Billy No Mates

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,290 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Barnsley

Posted 13 April 2016 - 05:58 PM

Earlier last year, I became increasingly aware that my Bilstein shock absorber were deteriorating.  I've been more than happy with the standard Bilsteins over the years (having replaced them once before), but I couldn't find anywhere that had them available.  Tried Vauxhall (discontinued), Autovaux (discontinued), Bilstein (discontinued but will refurb).
 
Considered the refurb route (it was cheap at £80 per shocker), but really wanted a new and viable replacement.
 
Read about Nitrons/Ohlins etc on this forum and didn't want the faffing about with clickable adjustments and height settings,  I just wanted a quality fit and forget replacement for the Bilsteins, that would do the same job.  Plus I'd read all about people having hard ride issues on Nitrons etc.  My car has been a daily drive for the last 90k miles and the Bilsteins provided a good compromise between comfort and handling.  
 
So looking around I spotted the Quantum Zeros.  From the Elise Parts website:
 
"....giving the performance previously only available with adjustable mono-shocks, but in a simple fit and forget package without any confusing adjustments."
 
".... it has been designed as a performance road damper that offers much better handling without compromising OE comfort levels too much."
 
"Spring rates are optional, we can offer either 200/400lb or 220/550lb rear progressive springs, front springs range from 275lb to 400lb depending on usage and what rear progressive spring is installed."
 
They sounded ideal, so I phoned Ian up at Elise Parts and discussed my requirements.
 
I requested 'Road Preference' over 'Track Preference' and was expecting the 200/400lb set. They supplied me with 375 Front and 220-550 Progressive Rears
 
I spoke to Ian at Eliseparts, who said that because of the heavier turbo engine, they would only supply the 220-550's on the rear.  The alternative 200-400 would be compressed too much by the turbo engine thus losing much of their progressiveness.
 
He said that the 375s on the front could be slightly softened, but there has to be a balance with the rears ultimately.
 
I fitted them and set the ride height to 130 rear/125 front.
 
I found the suspension to be way too hard.  The car was skittish all the time and felt like it was being shaken to pieces.  The harsness of the ride couldn't be good for the car, never mind my back.
 
I chatted to forum member Lou-m who also had fitted Quantum Zeros.  He originally ordered 325 fronts and the 220/550 progressives for the rear.  He found the rears to be much too hard.  So he swapped for the 200/400 progressives on the rear and found them to be too soft, i.e., he had to wind the preload on the spring up so much to get the correct ride hight, that the spring was partially coil bound. This meant that the rear springs would run out of travel very quickly. He went for 400lb non progressive rear springs after advise from Matthew Bentley. He was so much happier with the ride of the car afterwards.
 
I chatted with Matt Bentley, who advised not going below 350 on the rear, as the turbo has a tendency to dig in at the back on hard cornering.  He also advised a difference of not more than 100 front to rear.  He said that Bilstein knew what they were doing when they designed the turbo shockers, but that they just didn't last long enough and deteriorated.
I wanted to get as near as possible to the original Bilstein set up (because I was happy with the standard set up for daily driver), which is 275 front, 315 rear.  So I phoned up Ian at Eliseparts again, who was very accommodating. He advised that he would supply whatever springs I wanted without cost, to sort my issue out. Very nice man.
 
I decided to go 275/375, so same fronts as original but stronger rears (Matt Bentley's input).  All linear (non-progressive).  Ian said that they'd never supplied springs that soft for the Quantum Zeros, but was happy to do so, and was interested to know how I got on.
 
So I received and fitted the new 275/375 springs.  To get a ride height of 125f/130r I had to leave the springs fully extended without any pre-tensing, but the car settled nicely once dropped off the jack.
 
This resulted in the car being slightly more compliant, and not as shocking to drive.  I still felt  that it was harder than I wanted it to be, even knowing that the Quantums are a performance shocker and therefore the damping qualities will be firmer (regardless of spring rating).
 
I tried it for a couple of weeks to see if I could live with them.  I might have gotten used to the deterioration of my Bilsteins, and the car gradually became softer.  So I felt that I'd potentially lost my point of reference.
 
However, I simply couldn't live with the harshness as my daily drive.
 
I phoned Ian up again, and told him I was still not happy with the harsh damping properties of the Quantum Zeros.  He very graciously agreed to have me return the Quantums for a full refund. Top bloke!
 
So there's my story.  Make of it what you will.  My personal conclusions:
 
  • Quantum Zeros are too hard for a daily driver turbo, regardless of spring ratings
  • Ian and Eliseparts are a top notch company, who offer excellent advice and who put their customer first.
  • Go buy stuff from Eliseparts


#2 oblomov

oblomov

    oblomov

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,875 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:A colder windier place than stevieturbo's.
  • Interests:Mumblers

Posted 13 April 2016 - 06:12 PM

Where's Scuffers?



#3 Nev

Nev

    Nipper's Minion

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,587 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bristol
  • Interests:Rock climbing, skiing, kayaking, surfing, mountaineering, budgies, chess, practical mechanics.

Posted 13 April 2016 - 06:15 PM

Surely the rebound rate on the Quantums could have been lowered to almost nill? ( I am presuming they are 1-way at least)

 


Edited by Nev, 13 April 2016 - 06:16 PM.


#4 Horace

Horace

    Billy No Mates

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,290 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Barnsley

Posted 13 April 2016 - 06:22 PM

Zero adjustment on the Quantum Zeros.  Only the ride height is adjustable.



#5 Horace

Horace

    Billy No Mates

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,290 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Barnsley

Posted 13 April 2016 - 06:27 PM

Oh and here's some pictures of the lovely Quantum's (after removal from the car).

 

Posted Image

 

Posted Image



#6 The Batman

The Batman

    Super Moderator

  • 30,267 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:FLD mum's bed

Posted 13 April 2016 - 08:19 PM

I went from nitron 2 ways to quantums and im not happy with them either

 

im hoping after mbr sets it all up perfectly I will be happy with it...

 

time will tell but you are not alone! but I probably have left it way to long to send them back :lol:



#7 anz3001

anz3001

    Billy No Mates

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,617 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Leicester

Posted 13 April 2016 - 08:34 PM

Excellent, So to recap - Gaz Golds fall to pieces Gaz Mono have dodgy valving Nitron have no droop Quantum are too hard Gaz have great customer service Elise parts have great customer service Nitron have no customer service About right?

#8 Mr Apex

Mr Apex

    Super Member

  • PipPip
  • 320 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bristol
  • Interests:Karting, climbing, skiing, boxing, cycling

Posted 13 April 2016 - 08:36 PM

Sounds like nitron streets would be perfect for you. They offer improved ride over standard, but have enough adjustment available to make them work on track, too.

#9 pete-r

pete-r

    I never drive faster than I can see

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,771 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South Wales

Posted 13 April 2016 - 08:40 PM

My mate has nitron street on his car and it's great. Not as sophisticat damping as my blacks but miles better balance of comfort/sport than the OEM shocks.

#10 smiley

smiley

    Thetan level 15

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,427 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted 13 April 2016 - 08:41 PM

Excellent, So to recap - Nitron have no droop  

 

Old nitrons have no droop. Not sure in which exact year it was corrected for new ones. When send in for refurb this is corrected.

Longer eyelets are handed out free, referring to jjj's case.



#11 Captain Vimes

Captain Vimes

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,755 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South East
  • Interests:Motorbikes, VX220, Procrastination

Posted 13 April 2016 - 08:51 PM

As above, wouldn't a road biased 1-way adjustable damper be more suitable? The difference between the 450 rears and 525's on my nitrons was negligible in terms of comfort but the difference between 15 clicks on the damping and 30 is night and day. Anyone local to you with nitron street's fitted?

#12 Exmantaa

Exmantaa

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,982 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 13 April 2016 - 10:04 PM

As suggested here; try a set of Nitron Street Series.



#13 turbo boy

turbo boy

    Need to get Out More

  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,161 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Newark, Notts
  • Interests:Cars, fitness, fishing, sports

Posted 14 April 2016 - 05:16 AM

Good Morning Horace, I had the same dilemma as yourself and after much research and advice I chose the Bilstein Exige (Toyota engined) shocks and springs. I believe that this set up is what you are looking for? My car feels very crisp and alert helped by the updated 1" anti roll bar. MMG described it as one of the best stage 2 cars that they had driven. Maybe worth a look? Hope this helps. Jon

#14 T VXT

T VXT

    Super Member

  • PipPip
  • 433 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 April 2016 - 05:55 AM

I suppose it comes down to personal preference as I have the quantum zeros with 400 fronts and 220/550 rears, EP's track preference springs with a 1 inch ARB and their uprated Ertacetal bushes. I'm completely happy with their performance, so much more confidence inspiring. Mine is not a daily but is not a garage queen. I was looking for increased cornering performance and got it. If it was a daily I would have softer fronts, rears are fine in my opinion. I do have an issue with them, they sound like they have mice inside, squeaking a lot. I had a full suspension rebuild last year and has been like it ever since. I still need to get this sorted. I did pop in and see Ian at EP who agreed to look at them. I just havent had time to sort this, not quite the fit and forget I wanted.

#15 Pidgeon

Pidgeon

    Scary Internerd

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,254 posts

Posted 14 April 2016 - 07:12 AM

The conclusion from all of the above posts is that Lotus and Bilstein had it right from the box and everything else is marketed to remove the pounds from your pocket.

 

T VXT, it's your nasty plastic bushes that may be squeaking, they need lubrication.

 

Pete-R, I don't know your mate, but comments such as 'miles better balance of comfort/sport' simply can't be true.  Most fit new 'upgraded' units to their car, with stiffer spring rates and less sophisticated dampers, set off up the road and believe their stiff springs are 'sporty'.  On the track they may be....



#16 pete-r

pete-r

    I never drive faster than I can see

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,771 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South Wales

Posted 14 April 2016 - 07:30 AM

Pete-R, I don't know your mate, but comments such as 'miles better balance of comfort/sport' simply can't be true.  Most fit new 'upgraded' units to their car, with stiffer spring rates and less sophisticated dampers, set off up the road and believe their stiff springs are 'sporty'.  On the track they may be....

It is true I've driven his car. Compared to the OEM billies his car has a much better balance of crispness without being harsh. Maybe the OEM stuff was old and shot, but was too wallowy and soft by comparison.

#17 Nev

Nev

    Nipper's Minion

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,587 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bristol
  • Interests:Rock climbing, skiing, kayaking, surfing, mountaineering, budgies, chess, practical mechanics.

Posted 14 April 2016 - 07:55 AM

I've just reduced my spring poundage from 450f/600r to 350f/450r and am really liking the improvement for road driving. I fell it allows the car to float over the inumerable bumps and dips better without reacting so violently. It has also allowed me to increase the rebound rates which I previously had too low to try and reduce the harshness.


Edited by Nev, 14 April 2016 - 07:56 AM.


#18 T VXT

T VXT

    Super Member

  • PipPip
  • 433 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 April 2016 - 08:27 AM

Pidgeon, I don't think it's lubrication as the squeaky mice have been here since the first mile after the refresh. It looking like the shocks. There has been no change in the squeaking volume and/or frequenceny. It hasn't got any worse or better in the last ~1500 miles. Really annoying though as it's the tiny little bumps which do it.

#19 techieboy

techieboy

    Supercharger of Doom

  • 22,914 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bedford

Posted 14 April 2016 - 08:32 AM

Sure it's not the ARB? My 1" ARB has squeaked from the moment it went on, despite opening up the bushes a bit and packing in a load of grease.



#20 T VXT

T VXT

    Super Member

  • PipPip
  • 433 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 April 2016 - 08:36 AM

Nope, it's front and rear. And disconnect the arb to check that.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users