
Quaife Lsd Differential
#21
Posted 25 January 2005 - 06:51 PM
#22
Posted 25 January 2005 - 06:57 PM
that is the second reason why I decided to install the LSD.... I hope it will partly/fully cure the tendency to lock-up the rears FIRST, when at the limit or trail-braking....i noticed quite a big difference, i used to get rear end wiggle under braking and accelerating, now its almost completely gone.
#23
Posted 25 January 2005 - 06:58 PM
The wing did this for methat is the second reason why I decided to install the LSD.... I hope it will partly/fully cure the tendency to lock-up the rears FIRST, when at the limit or trail-braking....i noticed quite a big difference, i used to get rear end wiggle under braking and accelerating, now its almost completely gone.

#24
Posted 25 January 2005 - 07:57 PM
#25
Posted 25 January 2005 - 08:54 PM

#26
Posted 25 January 2005 - 08:57 PM


#27
Posted 25 January 2005 - 09:44 PM
#28
Posted 26 January 2005 - 01:16 AM

#29
Posted 26 January 2005 - 02:31 PM
Dear "the gits"The standard ATB slipper usually causes "push-on" understeer mid/exit corner.. our version solves this. We are getting one prototype one made soon for a VXR customer, and if it better than the FWD version, we'll get a batch made.
This sounds interesting but being a bear of very little brain I don't think I understand. This is probably compounded by the fact that although I understood various types of simple minded LSD (which mostly do nothing or lock up) I have no idea how the ATB actually does its stuff.
Do you think you could explain in a bit more detail what the characteristic of the FWD ATB is that you suggest causes it to provoke understeer and why your differently made unit won't? You don't need to tell me (unless you want to) how yours works inside but I should like to know how the transfer function differs (i.e. the mapping of drive distribution under different conditions of load, power and wheel speed differential).
Unless the thing is very sophisticated and can alter drive distribution to accord with the dynamic toe-in / toe-out at the rear end I have a bit of trouble seeing how it can yield a very different handling result. I don't say it doesn't - its just that I have trouble seeing it.
Kind regards - Ian
#30
Posted 26 January 2005 - 04:46 PM
#31
Posted 27 January 2005 - 01:36 AM
#32
Posted 27 January 2005 - 04:37 AM
don´t get me wrong either, but i have raced with a quaife atb the last 5 years on my endurance-car(started 1992).Dude/ Cyberman
Have a look at the Quafe brochure. It has an excellent cut-away diagram of the ATB diff. Note that the ATB works if a differnt way to both Torsen or plate diffs.
The Limited Slip functionality is governed by the six helical gears. The helix angle of these gears is very critical, and Quaife will confirm that he diff design does affect understeer characteristcs.
Plans ran these diffs in 36 races last season. We have done about a zillion miles of testing. So please don't confuse with the usual internet "this must be right because I read it in a forum" answers
It's simple physics. If you have weight transfer from the front to the rear under acceleration, and you have more grip at the rear than the front, your going to get understeer.
a lsd gives understeer i every configuration(in theori) but if you put a driver in the car, he will probably say that the atb gives no(or minimal) understeer in comparisation with a plate-type(whatever configuration) on at least exit turn.
before i changed to a atb i had a traditional preload plate-lsd, and the differens was like night and day.
#33
Posted 27 January 2005 - 11:00 AM
As it happens I am a simple physicist so I ought to understand.... I do not dispute your remarks that if you get more power down you will generate weight transfer and lift the front and this will lead to reduced front end grip. No problem at all.It's simple physics. If you have weight transfer from the front to the rear under acceleration, and you have more grip at the rear than the front, your going to get understeer.
However, either you were talking about another effect when suggesting that your LSD didn't cause understeer or by your definition your LSD inhibits power transfer (and therefore weight transfer etc etc). I am sure you didn't mean us to infer the latter.
So, what exactly is it that differentiates your device from the Quaife? I will go and read the Quaife stuff and see if I can work it out. However, all I really want to know is something that is "black box" measurable. I don't need to understand how it arises. If it really works it should be possible to say through what mechanism (e.g. when approaching wheel slip we transfer power earlier to the non-slipping wheel - or whatever).
Kind regards - Ian Douglass
#34
Posted 27 January 2005 - 11:43 AM
#35
Posted 28 January 2005 - 01:32 PM

#36
Posted 28 January 2005 - 02:08 PM
#37
Posted 28 January 2005 - 04:32 PM
I don't have any problem with your first statement as discussed and agreed earlier.If you stick the ATB diff in ... a RWD, mid engined car you get a lot more grip at the rear than the standard car. This causes the front to push away when you get on the power.
You can drive round it (like everything) but ultimately you get a slower lap time. Or, if you not timing, it's just a pain.
However, I don't agree that fitting the ATB leads to slower lap times than without the ATB. One may not be able to put full power down in some circumstances but thats always the case even though the reasons may vary. The question is: is more power being applied and is acceleration faster than without the ATB? I think it is so in all circumstances WRT my car.
#38
Posted 28 January 2005 - 04:36 PM
www.plansmotorsport.comthis sounds very interesting.
what company are you from?.
website?.

#39
Posted 28 January 2005 - 04:47 PM

#40
Posted 28 January 2005 - 05:09 PM
Edited by the gits, 28 January 2005 - 05:21 PM.
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users