
2.2 + Saab Head
#41
Posted 06 September 2008 - 06:14 PM
#42
Posted 06 September 2008 - 07:36 PM
#43
Posted 07 September 2008 - 09:32 AM



#44
Posted 07 September 2008 - 12:31 PM


you can see the difference I make to the exhaust ports, just use the gasket as a template and scribe around the port, then remove the excess material ensuring you keep the sides flat as you correct the port shape

I haven't seen any uk 'off the shelf' ported heads which have had this done


#45
Posted 07 September 2008 - 01:24 PM

Edited by Muncher, 07 September 2008 - 01:26 PM.
#46
Posted 07 September 2008 - 05:36 PM
stage 1 has the ports cleaned up and keeps standard valves
stage 2 has larger ports and keeps standard valves or cleaned up ports and bigger valves
stage 3 has larger ports and bigger valves
power gains I stated are for NA engines only, forced induction will react differently to improved engine flowrates, you may not see such high gains

GM said conrods are known to fail at 285 bhp, Eagle steel rods are a good investment

I use a die-grinder for roughing out and a dremel for finishing
#48
Posted 07 September 2008 - 06:58 PM

#49
Posted 07 September 2008 - 07:09 PM
When you say they're cheap, how cheap are we talking? I guess you just use a Dremel or are there any special tools to do it?
this is the best online guide i've found clicky
when I did a search for this a while back I found this guide
I'm gonna follow this
I've Maxr's old head and will be doing the porting on the
kitchen table over the winter

Edited by Baron Von Scubadaddy, 07 September 2008 - 07:11 PM.
#50
Posted 07 September 2008 - 07:44 PM

#51
Posted 07 September 2008 - 07:45 PM

Edited by Muncher, 07 September 2008 - 07:53 PM.
#52
Posted 07 September 2008 - 08:10 PM


#53
Posted 07 September 2008 - 08:19 PM
#54
Posted 07 September 2008 - 08:23 PM

Edited by Baron Von Scubadaddy, 07 September 2008 - 08:28 PM.
#55
Posted 08 September 2008 - 09:46 AM
I may be totally wrong, but I believe that the sc conversions are kept down to 250 bhp due to the rod issue.Is it the rods which limit the rpm on the standard 2.2? Given that the SC power delivery seems to be going up and up until you hit the rev limit, removing that bottleneck would be a good idea? I suppose if you have the head off to do that it would be rude not to swap it for a ported one...
certainly it makes sense to keep the power to a level which the bottom end can cope with.
if you fitted steel rods then I'm sure more power could be found and a ported head would certainly help with a stage 3 sc conversion.
in the states many are getting 350 bhp at the flywheel (from their sc engines), they have all fitted a ported head to reach that power level.
This is starting to sound more complex than I thought (as usual ) I was just going to get a dremel remove the rough bits make it look like vocky's pictures
put the bits in that are missing like valves and stuff ( yes I know shag all about engines )
give it to my local garage (who now dose all my work) along with the new TB and inlet manifold
and Roberts your Dad's brother .
Please say there is no more to it than that
you make it sound so easy

if you buy some standard size wasted stem valves you need no maching work, just port the head and after it's been cleaned reassemble the head
nothing hard about that, just don't expect to port a head in a day, I've spent two weeks on it and will spend another two weeks to finish it, you get bored after a while, so stop and do some more another day

#56
Posted 08 September 2008 - 10:15 AM
I may be totally wrong, but I believe that the sc conversions are kept down to 250 bhp due to the rod issue.
which technically the rods dont see...... as yeah you get 250bhp at the fly, but what about the 30orso BHP needed to spin up the S/C in the first place, so true crank power is more like 280 bhp :S
but yeah, power wrecks the STD rods (although im sure revving it to 8K with under 250bhp would pose problems too

#57
Posted 08 September 2008 - 11:34 AM
#58
Posted 08 September 2008 - 01:26 PM
Eagle conrods are $350 + shipping + any duty from all ecotec dot com
they will ship to europe

#59
Posted 08 September 2008 - 02:14 PM
#60
Posted 08 September 2008 - 02:21 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users