Standard OEM map:

Track Map (dip in torque due to 95 RON petrol):

Road Map:

Road Map with Standard Map Overlay:

Peak Torque Before/After: 183.4lbft @ 5600rpm / 267.9lbft @ 3600rpm
Peak Power Before/After: 200.2bhp @ 5800rpm / 241.0bhp @ 6100rpm
Posted 18 September 2010 - 09:56 AM
Posted 18 September 2010 - 10:00 AM
Posted 18 September 2010 - 10:49 AM
Haha. Yeah can definitely feel the difference between the track/road map, just picks up that little bit earlier. Feels like you're 500rpm higher at any given point. I've been running the track map since Feb which I went to from standard so the big change was then.That all looks very pretty, but what does your arsedyno think about the change?
Posted 18 September 2010 - 10:55 AM
Posted 18 September 2010 - 01:28 PM
Posted 18 September 2010 - 01:32 PM
Posted 18 September 2010 - 01:33 PM
Edited by rob999, 18 September 2010 - 01:34 PM.
Posted 18 September 2010 - 06:30 PM
Not this time, basically because I'd already paid for the other map and this is simply an alternative version which Liam would've offered if he had come up with it back then (plus I am sort of acting as a guinea pig for itNice results Si, did it cost anything to update the map?
Not sure Nev, he has dealt with lots of variations in spec though so it might be worth you askingLiam certainly seems to be offering a useful and well designed mapping service
Do you know if he has he ever mapped a car with GT30 yet?
Does Liam have a rolling road now?
If not whose does he use?
Yep still on road dyno. Can't really fault it though; I originally had a dyno run before and after the remap in Feb so it allowed me to see before and after figures; even if the initial numbers were wrong you can still rely on the percentage increase.I think he uses an onroad dyno (rather than static)
Posted 19 September 2010 - 11:05 AM
Car's been in for it's 4th service and whilst there also had MMG's 'road' version of the stage 1+ map as opposed to the previous one I had on (the 'track' map). As you can probably tell the maps are tailored more to road or track users respectively.
Peak Torque Before/After: 183.4lbft @ 5600rpm / 267.9lbft @ 3600rpm
Peak Power Before/After: 200.2bhp @ 5800rpm / 241.0bhp @ 6100rpm
Posted 19 September 2010 - 11:51 AM
Yep, still the only hardware change is the pre-cat replacement. In fairness to the track map I suspect there is more torque than is shown on that dyno; as stated that run was done with 95 RON petrol which the map is not designed for, after my first fill up with V-power I must admit it did seem significantly faster at low revs.Really impressive results from that. Are you still just running a pre-cat removal pipe & remap or have you had anything else done? Liam has got your lbft up to stage 2 level now (along with the bhp almost as before) which seems a big improvement from the last map.
More even power curve as well by look of it.
Does he think this will this cause any problems heat wise or clutch wise?
Posted 19 September 2010 - 10:28 PM
Posted 19 September 2010 - 11:55 PM
Yep, still the only hardware change is the pre-cat replacement. In fairness to the track map I suspect there is more torque than is shown on that dyno; as stated that run was done with 95 RON petrol which the map is not designed for, after my first fill up with V-power I must admit it did seem significantly faster at low revs.
Really impressive results from that. Are you still just running a pre-cat removal pipe & remap or have you had anything else done? Liam has got your lbft up to stage 2 level now (along with the bhp almost as before) which seems a big improvement from the last map.
More even power curve as well by look of it.
Does he think this will this cause any problems heat wise or clutch wise?
I went for a decent run yesterday and I think the road map is smoother on part-throttle as well; particularly when you are accelerating hard then back off the accelerator just enough for the boost to drop, there is no sudden jolt and loss of power like there used to be.
Regarding clutch problems- no problem on mine so far but car is fairly young and low mileage so inevitably it will give up some day. As you say it's basically average stage 2 torque so will probably suffer the same sort of wear as they do.
Heat wise - this is the main difference between the road map and the track map. The track map is deliberately scaled back due to the hammering the car gets on track and the subsequent rise in temperatures. The road map is more powerful but is not ideal for dealing with a long sustained load i.e. on a track. From what Liam said the road map is fine to use on track however after sustained heavy use the intake temps will start to get high and so the ECU will most likely start retarding the ignition and reducing boost, so you will start to lose power. On the road it's fine as you will never get the chance to be redlining through all the gears for long enough to get high temperatures.
I like the look of them results, I'm after a map myself can I ask how much they charge for this map?
Also where are mmg based?
Thanks
Posted 21 September 2010 - 06:38 PM
Posted 21 September 2010 - 06:41 PM
Posted 21 September 2010 - 07:00 PM
Generally similar shape, but it appears MMG maps tend to have more peak power and torque I think.Being an ignorant monkey I have no idea how these dyno plots compare to say a Courtenay or TMS stage 2. Anyone care to comment ?
By real I assume you mean rolling road? I've never seen one either but on the Welsh run we were both on and the recent Peak District run I was comfortably out accelerating Mani's VXR (he claims it's about 235bhp, but worst case should be 217bhp) and kept up with MrSimba's Exige 260 (though he might not have been gunning it because I think he was worried about stone chips). That would suggest the power figures are realistic at least.No idea. I don't think we've ever seen a real dyno plot from an MMG mapped car yet.
Posted 21 September 2010 - 07:27 PM
Sorry, yes, a rolling road graph.By real I assume you mean rolling road?
Posted 21 September 2010 - 08:17 PM
Posted 21 September 2010 - 09:15 PM
Posted 21 September 2010 - 09:42 PM
Posted 21 September 2010 - 09:48 PM
Liam has invested an awful lot of money and time developing and testing the range of tuning. He has looked at different rolling road dynos and on road dynos and compared them. He hasn't just opted for the on road dyno.
Sorry, yes, a rolling road graph.
By real I assume you mean rolling road?
Wasn't meant to sound like I was doubting the way MMG do it, or the performance gains. But would be good to see how the two methods compare directly.
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users