
Alternative Track Pads - Opinions
#21
Posted 18 March 2013 - 10:46 PM
#22
Posted 18 March 2013 - 10:50 PM
#23
Posted 18 March 2013 - 11:16 PM
#24
Posted 19 March 2013 - 07:52 AM
#25
Posted 19 March 2013 - 08:31 AM
I have tried the mintex m1155 on my N/A fitted with Nitron NTR's and track wheels (aswell as m1144's and CL5+ in another car) and in my opinion without doubt they are the best pads for fast road and occasional track use.
They wear very lightly in comparison to the mintex m1144, leave very little dust in comparison to the carbon lorraine and m1144 and my discs are like new after 8,000 miles and a trackday. The initial bite is quite keen and overall brake force is way up on the lesser m1155. They didnt fade on track either after 15 lap stints.
A major plus point for me is that they don't squeal like the more expensive pad options.
Camskill are also doing a deal for m1155 front and rear including discs all round for £191.95 inc Vat.
http://www.camskill....VX220_SPEEDSTER
Bargain, I paid just over £200+ postage about 4 years ago
#26
Posted 19 March 2013 - 08:45 AM
Thought this was an interesting review of EBC's offerings for the Elise:-
http://ebcbrakes.com...sd-blade-discs/
Quote about yellows from Gordon Sheddon "About half distance you could feel the pedal get a bit longer and i thought that might be the beginning of the end but to be fair they stabilised and although retardation was slightly reduced, there was very little brake fade except the last couple of laps in the very high speed braking points…"
And about Orange: "With the Yellowstuff I was effective in slowing the car down, but with the Orangestuff I could really change the attitude and balance of the Lotus on the brakes,,, for a a serious track day user or racer this is crucially important.. The pedal stayed firm throughout the run and the limiting factor was tyre grip rather than brake performance.."
Which suggested that EBC can make pads that work in the Elise platform but I can't find Orangestuff's for sale for the vx/elise and I don't know where the blue's will sit.
So you're happy to believe EBC's own website over a neutral opinions? EBC are a triumph of marketing over design and the mere fact they are mentioned on this thread demonstrates how good their marketing machine is (because their pads aren't).
You won't read anything bad about Mintex which are a proper pad. If you're budget conscious you need look no further. I am surprised RS-14s are £230 today, may be worth a call to Performance Braking in Monmouth, they've always given me the best price.
#27
Posted 19 March 2013 - 09:26 AM
#28
Posted 19 March 2013 - 09:31 AM
I have tried the mintex m1155 on my N/A fitted with Nitron NTR's and track wheels (aswell as m1144's and CL5+ in another car) and in my opinion without doubt they are the best pads for fast road and occasional track use.
They wear very lightly in comparison to the mintex m1144, leave very little dust in comparison to the carbon lorraine and m1144 and my discs are like new after 8,000 miles and a trackday. The initial bite is quite keen and overall brake force is way up on the lesser m1155. They didnt fade on track either after 15 lap stints.
A major plus point for me is that they don't squeal like the more expensive pad options.
Camskill are also doing a deal for m1155 front and rear including discs all round for £191.95 inc Vat.
http://www.camskill....VX220_SPEEDSTER
What is the cold bite like compared to the M1144?
#29
Posted 19 March 2013 - 09:42 AM
#30
Posted 19 March 2013 - 10:04 AM
I have tried the mintex m1155 on my N/A fitted with Nitron NTR's and track wheels (aswell as m1144's and CL5+ in another car) and in my opinion without doubt they are the best pads for fast road and occasional track use.
They wear very lightly in comparison to the mintex m1144, leave very little dust in comparison to the carbon lorraine and m1144 and my discs are like new after 8,000 miles and a trackday. The initial bite is quite keen and overall brake force is way up on the lesser m1155. They didnt fade on track either after 15 lap stints.
A major plus point for me is that they don't squeal like the more expensive pad options.
Camskill are also doing a deal for m1155 front and rear including discs all round for £191.95 inc Vat.
http://www.camskill....VX220_SPEEDSTER
What is the cold bite like compared to the M1144?
Haven't used 1144s but the thing I found with 1155s was if cold and you really had to jump on them hard or emergency stop at a lowish speed (40ish) they were lacking. Don't get me wrong they did the business for normal braking cold.
#31
Posted 19 March 2013 - 10:14 AM

#32
Posted 19 March 2013 - 10:20 AM
I have tried the mintex m1155 on my N/A fitted with Nitron NTR's and track wheels (aswell as m1144's and CL5+ in another car) and in my opinion without doubt they are the best pads for fast road and occasional track use.
They wear very lightly in comparison to the mintex m1144, leave very little dust in comparison to the carbon lorraine and m1144 and my discs are like new after 8,000 miles and a trackday. The initial bite is quite keen and overall brake force is way up on the lesser m1155. They didnt fade on track either after 15 lap stints.
A major plus point for me is that they don't squeal like the more expensive pad options.
Camskill are also doing a deal for m1155 front and rear including discs all round for £191.95 inc Vat.
http://www.camskill....VX220_SPEEDSTER
What is the cold bite like compared to the M1144?
Haven't used 1144s but the thing I found with 1155s was if cold and you really had to jump on them hard or emergency stop at a lowish speed (40ish) they were lacking. Don't get me wrong they did the business for normal braking cold.
I never found that, nor with the PFB97's either... sure the stopping wasnt 'as good' as when they were warm/hot but they were in no way lacking the ability to outdo OEM braking requirements from cold.
#33
Posted 19 March 2013 - 10:27 AM
#34
Posted 19 March 2013 - 10:27 AM
Edited by SteveA, 19 March 2013 - 10:28 AM.
#35
Posted 19 March 2013 - 11:23 AM
#36
Posted 19 March 2013 - 11:29 AM
#37
Posted 19 March 2013 - 11:51 AM
What is your mix of road vs track driving, and what tyres/suspension do you run?
Tyres are 888's, suspension is Nitron Street series.
I always hope to do more track days than I do but total mileage will be around 3k per year and (hopefully) 3-4 track days... I'm also considering swapping pads for track/road use but would prefer something that does both.
For your application I would never suggest a race pad, not anything sintered. Go 1155s and you have one setup that does everything. The camskills deals are nigh on unbeatable.
#38
Posted 19 March 2013 - 12:50 PM
I have tried the mintex m1155 on my N/A fitted with Nitron NTR's and track wheels (aswell as m1144's and CL5+ in another car) and in my opinion without doubt they are the best pads for fast road and occasional track use.
They wear very lightly in comparison to the mintex m1144, leave very little dust in comparison to the carbon lorraine and m1144 and my discs are like new after 8,000 miles and a trackday. The initial bite is quite keen and overall brake force is way up on the lesser m1155. They didnt fade on track either after 15 lap stints.
A major plus point for me is that they don't squeal like the more expensive pad options.
Camskill are also doing a deal for m1155 front and rear including discs all round for £191.95 inc Vat.
http://www.camskill....VX220_SPEEDSTER
What is the cold bite like compared to the M1144?
I honestly find the cold bite (first application) to be way above the oem pad and equal to the m1144. After the first 1 or 2 dabs of the pedal the bite is quite keen but not overwhelming. They are head and shoulders power and feel wise above m1144 for fast road up to quick trackday pace.
Obviously if your driving a 250 bhp plus car you may want some more initial bite for the faster corner entries ( the m1155 would still be perfectly adequate beyod this level IMO) but the trade off of the expensive pads is increased wear on discs, loads of corrosive dust and super irritating squeal.
#39
Posted 19 March 2013 - 12:59 PM
odd, I felt the opposite, just got better the more of a beating I gave them. Sure its not a fluid related problem ?
I use Halford Racing Fluid which has one of the highest boiling points of any brake fluid in its category and change it every 4th trackday.
It honestly didn't feel that bad but the data showed a 20% retardation in force.
#40
Posted 19 March 2013 - 01:02 PM
For those that mentioned discs/fluid - I already have some blank pagid discs from ECP and some Motul RBF600 fluid - which I will flush annually.
I'm still intruiged by the EBC Bluestuff and dropped a quick e-mail to EBC for their comments on this thread and to ask if they were willing to supply a set of pads for evaluation purposes. Here's the response:-
Hi
I suspect most of the problems people have had is only putting them in the front and then they don’t work well with other compounds in the back
You then get inconsistent braking and poor performance
Yellow were good enough to win the Lotus Elise racing championship with Rob Boston last year although on occasions he did use blue front yellow rear not what we would recommend but he liked it
You should not be concerned about some crumbling around the edges that’s how the pad works and the surface may be pitted not a problem
Interesting to note that someone said our pads are not good on lighter cars
Championship wins in FF1600 FF2000 lightweight single seaters
Championship win in hot hatch Suzuki swift
90+ drivers in the MX5 Championship and championship overall wins 5 out of the last 6 years
Silverstone driving experience use yellow on all their cars including the exige
All at odds with the lighter car info from the forum
No one should use green on track it is a road only pad as is red
Regards
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users