Read a new term today. "Sky fairies"

Posted 23 February 2014 - 05:41 PM
Read a new term today. "Sky fairies"
Posted 23 February 2014 - 10:20 PM
Would you believe it though, I found a damn leprechaun in my garden the other morning! When I came back there was a small bit of disturbed soil, I'm fairly certain it was the leprechaun and not the dog because I didn't actually see how it happened and nobody else has seen the leprechaun either.You dont think the devil played a hand in causing much of the strife? Oh I forgot. He dont exist does he. Cause science cant prove it.
Posted 23 February 2014 - 10:27 PM
Again, and you seem to be avoiding it.... Exists or not, I do not care. Who told you that he does exist and that you shall believe? My daughter wouldn't believe in Father Christmas if my wife and I didn't tell her and play up the act with her. So someone must have told you about the idea and truth of god (and you to be in a state to truly believe in it). This isn't to mock or anything, its purely to understand how one person can believe and another could dismiss it.You dont think the devil played a hand in causing much of the strife? Oh I forgot. He dont exist does he. Cause science cant prove it.Relegion is indoctrination bases superstition. Didn't bring much except wars and terror.... And is persistently present in modern times. Drop it!
Posted 23 February 2014 - 10:35 PM
Father Christmas IS real !!
Posted 23 February 2014 - 10:37 PM
You mean a fat old man in a red suit emptied his sack in your room one night? Is it your coping mechanism?Father Christmas IS real !!
Posted 23 February 2014 - 11:34 PM
This for me is exactly it. I can see how an engine works, I can understand the concept of quantum mechanics, I know how an aeroplane wing creates lift. What I do think is that for someone to believe so strongly in something that has no evidence, only "faith", is either weak (and looking for something/anything to believe in) , naive or has been severely misguided.Again, and you seem to be avoiding it.... Exists or not, I do not care. Who told you that he does exist and that you shall believe? My daughter wouldn't believe in Father Christmas if my wife and I didn't tell her and play up the act with her. So someone must have told you about the idea and truth of god (and you to be in a state to truly believe in it). This isn't to mock or anything, its purely to understand how one person can believe and another could dismiss it.
Posted 24 February 2014 - 11:23 AM
see thats not going to help.....
Posted 24 February 2014 - 12:42 PM
Don't take away my dreams :-p Or is that faithYou mean a fat old man in a red suit emptied his sack in your room one night? Is it your coping mechanism?Father Christmas IS real !!
Edited by mbes2, 24 February 2014 - 12:42 PM.
Posted 02 March 2014 - 10:35 AM
This for me is exactly it. I can see how an engine works, I can understand the concept of quantum mechanics, I know how an aeroplane wing creates lift. What I do think is that for someone to believe so strongly in something that has no evidence, only "faith", is either weak (and looking for something/anything to believe in) , naive or has been severely misguided.Again, and you seem to be avoiding it.... Exists or not, I do not care. Who told you that he does exist and that you shall believe? My daughter wouldn't believe in Father Christmas if my wife and I didn't tell her and play up the act with her. So someone must have told you about the idea and truth of god (and you to be in a state to truly believe in it). This isn't to mock or anything, its purely to understand how one person can believe and another could dismiss it.
So Im weak. Im misguided. Im naive?
You must know me very very well to come out with this assumption.
Funny thing is I cant remember meeting you. Ever. All this coming from someone so assured of evidence. Yet you have no evidence Im any of these?
For someone so weak misguided and naive all be told I don't think I've done too bad for myself. And I recon the few folks here in .Org that really know me (beyond the odd tunnel run / meet) probably agree.
You see, this thread is all about believing in a God. So I've tried to explain why I believe in a God. And belief in God requires an level of faith based on not seeing, not having any scientific evidence. This doesnt make me 100% happy 100% of the time. But it doesnt make me weak, misguided or naive.
Posted 02 March 2014 - 10:55 AM
Posted 02 March 2014 - 11:07 AM
You can't win slindborg. He believes in something he concedes there is no proof of its existance. To a believer that makes him strong. To a non-believer that makes him deluded, easily led, misguided naive, and weak. Doesn't mean he is that way in other things in life, he doesn't seem to be.
Casino, I've not met you but you don't seem weak, misguided or naive, but can you concede how about this specifically it can been seen so?
I read an article recently about Jonathan Edwards the athlete who no longer believes. It was full of this religious language that for some reason we still use. E.g. 'lost his faith'. It's like his faith exists, but he can't find it. And 'no longer believes in god', which is like, god exists, but he no longer believes in him. Why do people still use this language, even atheists?
Posted 02 March 2014 - 11:07 AM
Posted 02 March 2014 - 11:18 AM
I don't want to win.. I want to find out when and who made him believe.... You can't believe in something (as popular and well defined as god) unless you are told of it or atleast the concept of it, so someone must have taught mr casino something of god for a faith and belief to bloom.You can't win slindborg. He believes in something he concedes there is no proof of its existance. To a believer that makes him strong. To a non-believer that makes him deluded, easily led, misguided naive, and weak. Doesn't mean he is that way in other things in life, he doesn't seem to be. Casino, I've not met you but you don't seem weak, misguided or naive, but can you concede how about this specifically it can been seen so? I read an article recently about Jonathan Edwards the athlete who no longer believes. It was full of this religious language that for some reason we still use. E.g. 'lost his faith'. It's like his faith exists, but he can't find it. And 'no longer believes in god', which is like, god exists, but he no longer believes in him. Why do people still use this language, even atheists?
Posted 02 March 2014 - 11:28 AM
I think it's something intrinsic in some/many people. Plenty of religious people have just made their own stuff up regardless of what they are taught. It stems from a need to know the purpose of life (there isn't one), and that death isn't real (it is). Also some people need to belong.
I honestly think we've evolved this way. Because we congregate It has given us a natural advantage. Doesn't mean there's any logic to it, or that we should continue that way.
This was what Jonathan Edwards said: -
If there is no God, does that mean that life has no purpose? Does it mean that personal existence ends at death? They are thoughts that do my head in. One thing that I can say, however, is that even if I am unable to discover some fundamental purpose to life, this will not give me a reason to return to Christianity. Just because something is unpalatable does not mean that it is not true.
Posted 02 March 2014 - 11:33 AM
I think Alex Salmond needs to get to grips with that too. Just because it's unpalatable and also true, doesn't make it bullying.Just because something is unpalatable does not mean that it is not true.
Posted 02 March 2014 - 11:36 AM
Posted 02 March 2014 - 11:51 AM
Edited by Mangham54, 02 March 2014 - 11:53 AM.
Posted 02 March 2014 - 12:34 PM
Posted 02 March 2014 - 06:09 PM
Posted 05 March 2014 - 09:17 PM
so for lent have you
1 .stopped believing in God
2. stopped not believeing in God, but then why do you believe in Lent in the first place?
3. other
H
me..40 days of not swearing..ftw...
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users